W_Z wrote:
The Heavy Stool Crew
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Why not a new name? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=42349 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | W_Z [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
The Heavy Stool Crew |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
W_Z wrote: The Heavy Stool Crew
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
two and a half men! 
|
|
| Author: | Matty [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
jimmypasta wrote: two and a half men! Nicely played. Which one is the half though? You'll have different answers for body size and radio contribution. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
I do agree with the name change. Not sure they do much to attain Saloon status, no good fights! lol |
|
| Author: | CSFMB Guy [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Three dicks, wow 
|
|
| Author: | Spiral Stairs [ Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Carmen, Jurko, and Fat-no-talent-fathahelpme-terrihemmertlookalike-assclown |
|
| Author: | jemadden [ Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
harry has been particularly brutal the for the last month or so |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
The "This Show is Still On?" Show |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Mon Feb 01, 2010 1:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
The HUGE Embarassing Failure Show |
|
| Author: | Beef Rockmore [ Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
The ironic thing in all of this is that Jim Pastor has effectively hurt the ratings of two shows: As Mac has taken away plenty of Waddle and Silvy's listeners. And Boers and Bernstein have taken away Afternoon Saloon patrons. ...and I'm sure WSCR obliterates whatever national crap is airing between 1 and 2. |
|
| Author: | Spiral Stairs [ Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Beef Rockmore wrote: The ironic thing in all of this is that Jim Pastor has effectively hurt the ratings of two shows: As Mac has taken away plenty of Waddle and Silvy's listeners. And Boers and Bernstein have taken away Afternoon Saloon patrons. ...and I'm sure WSCR obliterates whatever national crap is airing between 1 and 2. excellent point. if pastor had re-negotiated a lower contract with mac and dumped tiny teri hemmert, espn1000 would be sitting much better |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
The Afterthought Saloon? 
|
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Should be five and a half men. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
This show is like Conan. Took some time to get used to it and now getting killed because they have no audience from 1-2 to lead into their show. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Partially agree, they have no lead in. People tune out for SVP. When B&B are discussing sports they are exceptional. When they are not discussing sports they are almost always unlistenable for me. The saloon is blah and a lot of people can't stand Harry. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Spaulding wrote: When B&B are discussing sports they are exceptional. You will be in the ALS before long. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
No because a lot of thier show while sports related isn't what I want to listen to. I also have issues with Bernstein. He reminds me of that asshole in school that raises his hand with 10 minutes of class left and says are we taking that quiz today or should we hand in our homework. Or worse that "do we have to know dates?" kid in history. I like when he breaks something down or has a sport related point. I find his sense of humor a little confusing. For somebody worried about how smart and clever he is to other people some of the things he finds funny/jokes would seem beneath him. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
You are well on your way. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
No. There are lots of places my tounge does not belong. B&B's asses are two of them. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
Denial is a crucial step in the journey. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
I can't see ever defending them. I will keep them like they keep their audience - at an arm's length. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Why not a new name? |
You will get there |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|