Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

I heard a "Rob Peter to pay Paul" and I switched the station.

Edit: I turned espn 1000 back on at 8:50 and they were talking about the 2005 white sox compared to now. Sean said "They all had career years that year including Jermain Dye, Jim Thome, Tadihito Iguchi......"

Same old Sean can't get his facts together. If they had Jim Thome then they would have gone 11-0 in the playoffs not 11-1.

Salisbury is fine on a national show.

Sean wasn't "fine" this morning....

I mistakenly caught a few minutes of this when I got in my car this morning, and they were talking about Michael Jackson. From some unknown reason the Silliest was positing that every kid gets 3 classic albums in their childhood. He mentioned that Thriller was one of those albums. OK, I don't understand where there theory comes from or what it's based on, but I'll give you Thriller, it's a great album. Salisbury asks him what the other two are. He says Bruce Springsteen's "Born To Run" and Pearl Jam's "Ten". That must have been one hell of a long childhood, since Born To Run came out in 1975 and Ten was released in 1991.

Author:	Killer V [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:46 am ]
Post subject:	Fill In
Hey. That Sean Salisbury is pretty good on the radio. He ought to get his own show. But, maybe he should start with a local show before moving on to a national gig...

Author:	W_Z [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:54 am ]
Post subject:
and he's with "the silliest". i know what i won't be listening to this morning..

Author:	Bagels [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 6:59 am ]
Post subject:
I mistakenly caught a few minutes of this when I got in my car this morning, and they were talking about Michael Jackson. From some unknown reason the Silliest was positing that every kid gets 3 classic albums in their childhood. He mentioned that Thriller was one of those albums. OK, I don't understand where there theory comes from or what it's based on, but I'll give you Thriller, it's a great album. Salisbury asks him what the other two are. He says Bruce Springsteen's "Born To Run" and Pearl Jam's "Ten". That must have been one hell of a long childhood, since Born To Run came out in 1975 and Ten was released in 1991.

Author:	OakBrookJoe [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:54 am ]
Post subject:
I heard a "Rob Peter to pay Paul" and I switched the station. Edit: I turned espn 1000 back on at 8:50 and they were talking about the 2005 white sox compared to now. Sean said "They all had career years that year including Jermain Dye, Jim Thome, Tadihito Iguchi......" Same old Sean can't get his facts together. If they had Jim Thome then they would have gone 11-0 in the playoffs not 11-1.

Author:	HappyHour Jason [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:30 am ]
Post subject:
And poor seany cakes had to be sent home last night so he could get some sleep and be prepared for this morning. They should have sent him home last year.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Fill In https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=14244	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Darren - Tinley Park [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 9:39 am ]
Post subject:
OakBrookJoe wrote: I heard a "Rob Peter to pay Paul" and I switched the station. Edit: I turned espn 1000 back on at 8:50 and they were talking about the 2005 white sox compared to now. Sean said "They all had career years that year including Jermain Dye, Jim Thome, Tadihito Iguchi......" Same old Sean can't get his facts together. If they had Jim Thome then they would have gone 11-0 in the playoffs not 11-1. I thought I heard him mention Thome. But if they would have had Thome, they might not have won the WS without Aaron "da fire and da passion" Rowand .

Author:	Mustang Rob [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:10 am ]
Post subject:
OakBrookJoe wrote: I heard a "Rob Peter to pay Paul" and I switched the station. Edit: I turned espn 1000 back on at 8:50 and they were talking about the 2005 white sox compared to now. Sean said "They all had career years that year including Jermain Dye, Jim Thome, Tadihito Iguchi......" Same old Sean can't get his facts together. If they had Jim Thome then they would have gone 11-0 in the playoffs not 11-1. I cought that too. Sean once again proving why his "local" Chicago show was such a smashing success. Joe, I think you need to e-mail this to MJH for next week's Critics segment.

Author:	Colonel Angus [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:30 am ]
Post subject:
I never knew why they chose Sean Salisbury to host a local Chicago sports show. The only time he spent here before that, he was holding a clipboard on the Vikings' sideline.

Author:	W_Z [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:33 am ]
Post subject:
i'm not defending uncle rico, but let me put things in perspective here. you have a guy who already is pretty incoherent, and sloppy with his facts ana ana ana his speech patterns. but you're putting him on the air with less than 2 hours sleep? i'm surprised he didn't say anything about ozzie guillen playing for the 2005 white sox.

Author:	OakBrookJoe [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:36 am ]
Post subject:
He's had about 5 months to sleep I will email it in to Critics next week....if I can remember.

Author:	BD [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:19 am ]
Post subject:
Salisbury is fine on a national show. I don't really have much interest in him talking local sports though - I'm sure he was more concerned with his corporate ESPN job, and focused on that much more so than actually watching many White Sox games.

Author:	OakBrookJoe [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:40 pm ]
Post subject:
Quote: Salisbury is fine on a national show. I disagree. Not only did Sean not know his local clubs, but he would jump on every bandwagon for a player nationally too. The Tony Romo bandwagon, Bob Sanders bandwagon, etc.

Author:	HappyHour Jason [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:47 pm ]
Post subject:
Sean wasn't "fine" this morning....

Author:	Killer V [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:
HappyHour Jason wrote: Sean wasn't "fine" this morning.... He'll be awsome when football season rolls around...

Author:	MattInTheCrown [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:
This show has the most misleading name of all time. It's usually Mike and someone, or someone and someone, but very rarely Mike and Mike.

Author:	Darren - Tinley Park [ Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:26 pm ]
Post subject:
Anyone hear Eric K (or C) this morning? They were talking about the top stories of 2007 and the Appalachain St / Michigan game. He said a bigger upset was Stanford over USC. I can possibly agree with that. He stated that Stanford was a 41 point underdog, making USC a seven touchdown favorite. Now I know a touchdown is actually only worth six points, but in the sports wagering industry, don't we usually refer to a touchdown favorite as being favored by seven points. That would have made USC a six touchdown favorite, Eric.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	OldSchoolScoreFan [ Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:56 pm ]
Post subject:
Baku wrote: I mistakenly caught a few minutes of this when I got in my car this morning, and they were talking about Michael Jackson. From some unknown reason the Silliest was positing that every kid gets 3 classic albums in their childhood. He mentioned that Thriller was one of those albums. OK, I don't understand where there theory comes from or what it's based on, but I'll give you Thriller, it's a great album. Salisbury asks him what the other two are. He says Bruce Springsteen's "Born To Run" and Pearl Jam's "Ten". That must have been one hell of a long childhood, since Born To Run came out in 1975 and Ten was released in 1991. I thought the same thing.