It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 1:53 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
http://www.bleachernation.com/2013/07/0 ... l-america/

The Cubs Have Three (or Four) of the Top 20 Prospects in Baseball According to Baseball America
By Brett on July 9, 2013

Yesterday, Baseball America revealed its midseason top 50 prospect update, and, as it was with Baseball Prospectus’s update, the Cubs are well-represented.

All of The Big Three made the cut, with Jorge Soler at 18, Albert Almora at 16 (with Dylan Bundy sandwiched in between, for what that’s worth), and Javier Baez all the way up at number 10. I’m not sure I can remember the last time the Cubs had three positional players in the consensus top 50 in the game, let alone top 20 (or 30, if you ask BP).

Having 3 of the top 18 prospects in the game is fantastic for the future of the organization. Remember, these guys aren’t merely being relied upon as future contributors as the Cubs, but they are theoretical trade chips that can be used for big league pieces (and the better they’re regarded, the more value they have).

And if you read Luke’s Minor League Daily today, you know that it gets even better. BA’s Jim Callis, in response to a question about draft pick quality, suggested that – at least in his opinion – top Cubs draft pick Kris Bryant, when he signs this week, will become the Cubs’ best prospect. Given how closely The Big Four are going to be bunched, it’s really hard to say who is the best of the lot. Even if it isn’t Bryant, he figures to fall at least somewhere in the middle of the group.

That means, when Bryant signs this week – and he will – the Cubs will have 4 of the top 31 prospects in baseball, according to BP, and 4 of the top 19 prospects in baseball, according to BA.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Just coming to post the same article. Awesome how relatively quickly the farm has been improved. Wouldn't be too shocked to see 1 of the 4 moved in the offseason for MLB talent.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Sox Fans wrote:
gonna have a parade?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Sox Fans wrote:
gonna have a parade?


Ha, true. But +1 to ND's thoughts. This is still pretty cool.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Sox wouldn't have one in the top 100.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Good news I guess. This prospect stuff is such a damn shitshow. :|


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Kirkwood wrote:
Good news I guess. This prospect stuff is such a damn shitshow. :|

Has a team with several highly ranked prospects ever NOT won multiple World Series?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
rogers park bryan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Good news I guess. This prospect stuff is such a damn shitshow. :|

Has a team with several highly ranked prospects ever NOT won multiple World Series?

Royals? Brewers? Indians? Rays? Rays and Indians probably not fair as they were right there. Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?

I was always a sucker for Cubs hype with prospects. No more.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15138
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
Cardinals have #2, 12, 24...I like their chances better.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Kirkwood wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Good news I guess. This prospect stuff is such a damn shitshow. :|

Has a team with several highly ranked prospects ever NOT won multiple World Series?

Royals? Brewers? Indians? Rays? Rays and Indians probably not fair as they were right there. Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?

I was always a sucker for Cubs hype with prospects. No more.

THAT'S THE JOKE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
They need to hurry up. I was a little saddened at the fact that I was watching the game yesterday and did not know who #1 was (Cody Ransom). I used to watch the games every day, good or bad. I've tapped out after a few weeks since 2010. Especially with Quade and his lame nicknames.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Kirkwood wrote:
Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?



I dont remember but if they did wouldnt that support what they are doing now. 2003-2008 was the best stretch of Cubs teams in my lifetime.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?



I dont remember but if they did wouldnt that support what they are doing now. 2003-2008 was the best stretch of Cubs teams in my lifetime.

Derrek Lee
Aramis Ramirez
Soriano


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?



I dont remember but if they did wouldnt that support what they are doing now. 2003-2008 was the best stretch of Cubs teams in my lifetime.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/2006-organization-talent-rankings-854/

In 2002 they were #1 and 2003 were #3. Cubs did use those chips to snag Ramirez & Lee.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
prior, juan cruz, corey patterson, david kelton, hee sop choi, bobby hill. zambrano had the best career.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:52 pm
Posts: 12558
Location: Ex-Naperville, Ex-Homewood, Now Tinley Park
pizza_Place: Oh I'm sorry but, there's no one on the line
Hatchetman wrote:
zambrano had the best quote -- We Stinks

_________________
"All crowds boycotting football games shouldn't care who sings or takes a knee because they aren't watching." - Nas


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Kirkwood wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?



I dont remember but if they did wouldnt that support what they are doing now. 2003-2008 was the best stretch of Cubs teams in my lifetime.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/2006-organization-talent-rankings-854/

In 2002 they were #1 and 2003 were #3. Cubs did use those chips to snag Ramirez & Lee.


That's what I mean. If the current crop of young prospects come up to the bigs and are great I am happy with that. I'm just as happy with them stockpiling them and unloading them for current MLB talent as well.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
spmack wrote:
They need to hurry up. I was a little saddened at the fact that I was watching the game yesterday and did not know who #1 was (Cody Ransom). I used to watch the games every day, good or bad. I've tapped out after a few weeks since 2010. Especially with Quade and his lame nicknames.


The team has actually been fun to watch lately.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
Didn't the Cubs have the #1 rated system at one point in the early 2000s?



I dont remember but if they did wouldnt that support what they are doing now. 2003-2008 was the best stretch of Cubs teams in my lifetime.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/minors/2006-organization-talent-rankings-854/

In 2002 they were #1 and 2003 were #3. Cubs did use those chips to snag Ramirez & Lee.


That's what I mean. If the current crop of young prospects come up to the bigs and are great I am happy with that. I'm just as happy with them stockpiling them and unloading them for current MLB talent as well.


I'd look for a healthy dose of both strategies.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
immessedup17 wrote:
Remember David Kelton? :lol:


Kelton was a huge prospect despite the lack of minor league production. Again people ingnoring the stats. "He's YOUNG! He's got TOOLS!!"

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82148
enjoy your hope

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group