Puckhead wrote:
Here is a recent 2009 amateur interview with Darrell Horwitz:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/196080-cubs-scouting-director-tim-wilken-opens-up-about-the-organizationDH: In a Baseball Prospectus article that appeared in a Paul Sullivan column a while back, it said that the Cub farm system didn’t fare too well in their evaluation, and their quote was, “This is a weak system in which finding any future Cub stars requires a bit of dreaming.” Also, when it came to trying to trade for CC Sabathia and for Jake Peavy, it was said by scouts of other teams that the Cubs didn’t have the players in their minor league system to pull off those deals. What’s your take on those statements?
TW: I’m a prideful person and I could say let them come and see the whole system. A lot of their evaluations are what they see statistically. Some things we can improve upon here. We can get a higher ceiling type of player. I think our depth is as good as anyone at this point. I can’t answer for Baseball Prospectus or some unidentified scout that thinks he knows our system totally. A lot of our depth and talent is at the ‘A’ level. I understand it’s not punch you in the face talent, but I think there’s a fair amount of major leaguers that once they mature, they’re going to say they had some pretty good players. I say let’s check this thing out three years from now.
So he is essentially saying the guys that were drafted in '07 and '08 wont be major league ready until 2012? Whether he likes it or not, that perception does hold true as you see the players that are being brought up in September.
Bob, I agree about the athlete part. From reading Moneyball (which I dont subscribe to 100%) you can see how these scouts work. They look at the physical attributes and evaluate based on it. Not all the time, but often the baseball attributes seem to take second bill. I also dont believe signing 16-18 year old kids is always the right way to go, as we see now with Josh Vitters.
Thanks for posting that one too, Puckhead. I thought Horwitz asked some really good questions, Wilkens had to backtrack the entire time. Also funny that you quoted the same answer that stood out to me, that was the best one. Almost every quote is awesome:
TW: "We were looking specifically adding depth to the everyday players because up until the last few years, it’s kind of been a void for 15 years".
TW: "Later, getting to rounds five and beyond, you’re looking for players with average or slightly less than average type tools."
Good luck with that Tim. BTW, the amateur draft is 50 rounds, 1521 players were drafted this year. Meaning over 6000 players have been drafted since he took over in 2006...he gives up looking for talent/tools after the 5th round? Plus there are international signings, but thats just piling on.)
Here the best:
TW: "I’m a prideful person and I could say let them come and see the whole system. A lot of their evaluations are what they see statistically". (Major bullshit...wait for it...)
TW: "I think our depth is as good as anyone at this point. I can’t answer for Baseball Prospectus or some unidentified scout that thinks he knows our system totally." (Wait for it...)
TW: "A lot of our depth and talent is at the ‘A’ level. I understand it’s not punch you in the face talent. I say let’s check this thing out three years from now."
So basically..he's looking for players with less than average tools and acts smug regarding Prospectus / scouts. He says come look at the
whole system, says
our depth is as good as anyone at this point, but
A lot of our depth and talent is at the ‘A’ level and then bashes those guys...and says lets check this out in 3 years...awesome.
Plus how much depth can you have on your A team? (Well, we don't have catching in AA or AAA, but we're stacked at C at A? Is that what he means?) So the guy has been the Cubs' Scouting Director since JANUARY 2006 and as you said, the next generation of Cubs will be ready in 2012 according to him..? ...and he says their depth is as good as anyone and then says its all is at the A level...?
I assume Tim wants to keep his job so of course he has to bullshit, but come on, do a better job of it...and don't act smug like no one knows what they are talking about, because then you'll attract attention and lose your job, which you should. Just my 2 cents.

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.