It is currently Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:10 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94336
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
So you are telling me the 2003 team is equal in talent to the 2007 and 2008 teams?

If you want to call them all star teams, then you need to use the benchmark for judging that, which would be all star players.


So you are saying that the '03 roster was equal in talent to the 2007 and 2008 rosters?

I'm not saying that. You are saying that the 2007 team was an all star team.
In 2007, the Diamondbacks, Mets, and Dodgers all had more all stars just for the National League.

It's very subjective to say whether or not last year's team had more "talent". It however, is not subjective at all to say that, compared to 2003, the 2007 team was an all star team. That can be answered by number of all stars. It is tied if you don't count Sammy Sosa who would easily have been an all-star if healthy.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Cubs team was picked to go to the WS


by you? I've heard the Mets and Phillies being the most talked about NL winners, and Jayson Stark had the Braves going. I dont think many national people picked the Cubs.


ESPN picked them and I believe Sport Illustrated did too. There were a few magazines that picked them to lose to the Tigers or Indians. I also picked them to make it there in early March.


Only 3 out of 19 ESPN "experts" predicted it. I dont think the expectations were as lofty as you thought.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview08 ... xpertpicks

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Last edited by FavreFan on Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Cubs team was picked to go to the WS and the '03 Cubs team was predicted to win 70 games only because of the bump they would receive with Dusty as the manager. IMO that is night and day.

So what happened the next year when they were picked to go to the world series?


That's the year that they had a great team with a lot of injuries and wet the bed in the last week when everyone was healthy. I never said the '04 Cubs team was bad. I think it was by far the best team Baker had and losing a 3 game lead in the last week of the season still hurts. Without the injuries or Sammy putting cork in his bat I think they would have made it to the WS. Dusty really blew it the last week of the season. He did a great job getting an injured team to that point and blew it when they were healthy. I will never deny that. I think the Cubs roster is better this year than it was in '04 though.


That's the year? The only year? There weren't any injuries last year?
Nobody gets to use injuries as an excuse for losing... even though we all know it's the true reason. That's just how managers get judged, by managing who IS on the field .... not who isn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Cubs team was picked to go to the WS


by you? I've heard the Mets and Phillies being the most talked about NL winners, and Jayson Stark had the Braves going. I dont think many national people picked the Cubs.


ESPN picked them and I believe Sport Illustrated did too. There were a few magazines that picked them to lose to the Tigers or Indians. I also picked them to make it there in early March.


Only 3 out of 19 ESPN "experts" predicted it. I dont think the expectations were as lofty as you thought.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview08 ... xpertpicks



They thought enough of them to put them in the magazine losing to the Tigers.


I dont see how they could do that, unless you were reading an article by just one writer. The Mets are clearly the overwhelming favorite in their staff's eyes.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Im confused by the point of this thread coming from a guy with "Lou is gonna lead us to a WS title" or something along those lines in his sig before.

Is it to show that Dusty is a better manager than we remember, that Lou is a worse manager than we think, or both?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94336
Location: To the left of my post
Well, this topic seems to be going in a few different directions. Here are my questions as someone who isn't even a Cubs fan.

Dusty Baker does not deserve to be ridiculed because he took a team 5 outs from the World Series in his first season and then had three more seasons of average to below average results?
Lou Pinella deserves to be ridiculed because he took a team to the playoffs in his first season but should have done more with his "abundance" of talent and is currently predicted(and on pace) for another successful season?

Are Cubs fans supposed to judge every future manager on the basis that if you do not get within 5 outs of the World Series in your first year that you are worse than Dusty Baker, who at this point is considered to have failed in Chicago?

That seems like quite a precedent that was set.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
I was a Dusty fan just like I was a Chandler fan. It's a knockoff of the Chandler vs Wallace thread. I think Lou made a lot of mistakes last year but got a pass.


If I remember correctly Chandler and Dusty's career arcs were going complete opposite directions at the time of their departure.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I was a Dusty fan just like I was a Chandler fan. It's a knockoff of the Chandler vs Wallace thread. I think Lou made a lot of mistakes last year but got a pass.


If I remember correctly Chandler and Dusty's career arcs were going complete opposite directions at the time of their departure.


Then I don't think you were paying attention to people in the media or this board. I was the only one that thought the Chandler trade was a mistake as well as the Wallace signing. Some of the better basketball minds on this board thought I was crazy. Now some of the better baseball minds on this board think I'm crazy for backing Dusty.


Well yeah I wasnt on the board for the Chandler trade, and I was in favor of bringing Wallace here, but it was obvious Chandler was progressing and I thought it was equally obvious that he would improve greatly playing with the best PG in the NBA, who at the time wasnt but was still a top tier PG. I dont think we are viewing Chandler as the same player today if he had stayed with the Bulls.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94336
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I was a Dusty fan just like I was a Chandler fan. It's a knockoff of the Chandler vs Wallace thread. I think Lou made a lot of mistakes last year but got a pass.


If I remember correctly Chandler and Dusty's career arcs were going complete opposite directions at the time of their departure.


Then I don't think you were paying attention to people in the media or this board. I was the only one that thought the Chandler trade was a mistake as well as the Wallace signing. Some of the better basketball minds on this board thought I was crazy. Now some of the better baseball minds on this board think I'm crazy for backing Dusty.

Your backing of Wallace is canceled out by your backing of Rex Grossman. :)

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94336
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I was a Dusty fan just like I was a Chandler fan. It's a knockoff of the Chandler vs Wallace thread. I think Lou made a lot of mistakes last year but got a pass.


If I remember correctly Chandler and Dusty's career arcs were going complete opposite directions at the time of their departure.


Then I don't think you were paying attention to people in the media or this board. I was the only one that thought the Chandler trade was a mistake as well as the Wallace signing. Some of the better basketball minds on this board thought I was crazy. Now some of the better baseball minds on this board think I'm crazy for backing Dusty.

Your backing of Wallace is canceled out by your backing of Rex Grossman. :)


:cry: Wait till next year?


Let's hope so. One of the QB's needs to step up.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 1:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 5:09 pm
Posts: 5275
Location: In the hospital....
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
I was a Dusty fan just like I was a Chandler fan. It's a knockoff of the Chandler vs Wallace thread. I think Lou made a lot of mistakes last year but got a pass.


If I remember correctly Chandler and Dusty's career arcs were going complete opposite directions at the time of their departure.


Then I don't think you were paying attention to people in the media or this board. I was the only one that thought the Chandler trade was a mistake as well as the Wallace signing. Some of the better basketball minds on this board thought I was crazy. Now some of the better baseball minds on this board think I'm crazy for backing Dusty.

Your backing of Wallace is canceled out by your backing of Rex Grossman. :)


:cry: Wait till next year?


Let's hope so. One of the QB's needs to step up.


As does the offense and the defense.....

_________________
SideshowBob311: "Sadly enough, I think we're the "intelligent" portion of the sports radio fanbase".
"I make fun of whoever sucks, including me"- Harry 11/30/07


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38190
Location: ...
Nas wrote:

That's a b.s. argument just like the he shouldn't have rode Wood and Prior. If Dusty would have gone out and Prior would have given up all the runs and a sure handed Gonzalez still committed the error somehow Dusty would still be at fault. All it takes is to look back at some of the 2005 game threads here and you will see how a lot of you guys blamed Dusty everytime something bad happened. Lou had a team that won 110 games and wet the bed in the playoffs. Lou had a team last year that was superior to any team Dusty had other than '04 and he couldn't win. Lou has never won when he didn't have an all star team. Nothing about the '03 Cubs said all star team. In fact most people expected them to win about 70 games even with him as manager.


if dusty would have come out, then he would have done his job in the eyes of most people (obviously not all). then you could say...what the hell happened to the players.

you can still say that, but dusty couldn't just sit there and watch it hapen.

i don't think lou had a superior team. he had a suspect pitching rotation, and a lead off hitter who swung at every pitch.

dusty had a great lead off hitter with kenny lofton, a very solid pinch hitter in randal simon, and at the time, wood and prior were a VERY solid 1 - 2 punch, and zambrano was a young gun.

who cares about all star team anyway? that doesn't always win a world series.

dusty's team in '03 should have won game 6, and they could have beaten the yankees.

in '04 he let it all go, and if lou does the same thing, lou will get the same criticism--and maybe more, because like you said, "he has more talent".

but he STILL doesn't have a true ace pitcher OR a true lead off hitter (that he'll use). dusty did.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 11:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:43 pm
Posts: 1678
Nas wrote:
You can't seriously look at the rosters objectively and tell me the '03 Cubs roster was better than the '07 Cubs roster.


I don't know... Prior, Wood, and Z were probably the best 1-2-3 punch in the majors. The lineup was shaky but was much improved when Lofton and Ram came over at the deadline. And Sosa was still Sosa.

I will say that I don't buy the argument that Dusty ruined Prior and Wood. Or at least not beyond the extent that sometimes that's the risk you take when you're going for the World Series.

Also it must be conceded that despite the strong roster in 2004, the three main studs (Wood, Prior, and Sosa) greatly underachieved.

Nas wrote:
How about Sergio Mitre? Jerome Williams? John Koronka? Jon Leicester? Glendon Rusch? Todd Wellemeyer? Cliff Bartosh? Shawn Estes? Juan Cruz? Mark Guthrie? Felix Sanchez? Phil Norton?


Holy cow! :shock: :cry: I don't think anyone can debate those names. That's ugly. Though, you could go through most team's rosters and come up with similar names over a four year period. If Lou does four years here, he could point to the Sean Gallager's and Rocky Cherry's of the world too.

Nas wrote:
Larry Rothschild?


But Lou's got him too!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25106
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Nas wrote:
W_Z wrote:

if dusty would have come out, then he would have done his job in the eyes of most people (obviously not all). then you could say...what the hell happened to the players.
No they would say he should have taken him out. "Why did he come out if he wasn't going to take him out?"
"Dusty coming out caused Gonzalez to lose focus and that's the reason he made an error"

"They" wouldn't have said that, you're way out on a limb there. Maybe a columnist like Jay that just stirs the pot would write that but everybody still liked Dusty at that point. If we're just making things up that people would have said, I claim "they" would have said Dusty made the best decision in the history of the Cubs franchise by coming out there and talking to Prior because right after that he got out of the inning without any more damage being done and got a complete game win and the Cubs went to the World Series
Nas wrote:

W_Z wrote:
you can still say that, but dusty couldn't just sit there and watch it hapen.
Managers don't come out everytime a fan interferes with a ball or his all star pitcher gives up some runs. There wasn't a reason for him to come out other than to remove Prior from the game.

Everybody on the messageboard could have done what Dusty did right there, sit on their ass, do nothing, and hope for the best. 2 innings away from the World Series isn't the time to hope for the best. That's when good managers earn their money and bad ones lose series that they had in their hands [quote="Nas"]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 12:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25106
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Nas wrote:
24_Guy wrote:

I don't know... Prior, Wood, and Z were probably the best 1-2-3 punch in the majors.


They had the potential to be if they all had stayed healthy. In 2003 those guys won 45 games. Last year the Cubs top 3 starters also won 45 games.

That may be so, but no one in their right mind would take 2007 Zambrano, Lilly, and Marquis (and Hill) over 2003 Wood, Prior, and Z (and Clement).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38190
Location: ...
Nas, thanks for playing--but everything about the 2003 Cubs is an "if", and I don't blame Dusty for the collapse personally--but it is a manager's job to come out and try to calm things down with the players when EVERYONE KNEW something was wrong. Moises Alou was freaking out, and Prior was obviously rattled. Prior didn't need to be taken out of the game at that point, he needed a guy to come out there and say, "We got this". That's all.

That's not like...the ONLY moment that Dusty failed, or the team failed. They failed together. But you keep on pressing people that they should not be as hard on Dusty, and you have no argument that anyone is going to listen to to substantiate it.

Lou has to do better than Dusty, or else you can't possibly say Lou was a better manager than Dusty--however, Lou's done some things already that I never saw Dusty do--like play young players, and bench guys when they should be benched.

Now, the Soriano thing? I have no clue. I still think it's upper management telling Lou to keep leading him off when everyone in their right mind, anyone with a baseball IQ of 1, knows that he's not a lead off hitter.

I could care less what Dusty does from now on, I wish he went to another division so it wouldn't make it so easy to root against him, but I'm not a Dusty hater.

I'm also not a Dusty defender. He deserves criticism. So does Lou.

So do the Cubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7396
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
im trying to remember here: when the whole bartman thing happened, there was one on and one out, right? things hadnt gotten out of hand at that point. im not following how at that point prior needed settling down. alou is the one who needed settling down. granted, prior had issues after that, but i dont see how dusty would have felt it neccesary to go settle down his best pitcher in that situation. there was still one guy on and one out and nobody in, and as well as prior had done to that point, things still looked ok. after the wild pitch and walk to castillo, that is when i would agree that dusty may have wanted to have a few words. hindsight is always 20/20 though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66237
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Mofo, Prior was screaming his head off on the mound and Alou was freaking out in Left.
It was clear enough that he needed to be calmed down becuase my wife even said, "Wow, he's gonna lose it out there, look at him"

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Nas wrote:
24_Guy wrote:

I don't know... Prior, Wood, and Z were probably the best 1-2-3 punch in the majors.


They had the potential to be if they all had stayed healthy. In 2003 those guys won 45 games. Last year the Cubs top 3 starters also won 45 games.



2003
Mark Prior, 18-6, 2.43 ERA
Kerry Wood, 14-11, 3.20 ERA
Carlos Zambrano, 13-11, 3.11 ERA
Matt Clement, 14-12, 4.11 ERA

2007
Carlos Zambrano, 18-13, 3.95 ERA
Ted Lilly, 15-8, 3.83 ERA
Jason Marquis, 12-9, 4.60 ERA
Rich Hill, 11-8, 3.92 ERA

Which pitching staff would you rather have?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66237
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
This comment from the Reds message board could have come from the Cubs message board 4 years ago...

Quote:
My faith in Dusty is dwindling with each game. How long is it going to take before everybody realizes that Patterson hasn't had some great revelation and still swings at way too many pitches for a leadoff hitter? He simply is not a good hitter


Here's another...
Quote:
That's where I was hoping Dusty Baker could bring some kind of attitude change.. Maybe he still can, but managers can only do so much.

My favorite so far...
Quote:
Dusty Baker fits the bill as a retread too. Although I agree his past success gives me hope that he can turn this thing around. As I understand it, Chicago fans tired quickly of his handling of the team when they started losing. He got sorta detached and the players got antsy with him. Explains the booing the other night. He may get things going yet this season, it's fairly early, and I will be the first to congratulate him, but right now he seems in over his head. Said he was still evaluating his players the other day? HUH??? What is spring training for?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7396
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Darkside wrote:
Mofo, Prior was screaming his head off on the mound and Alou was freaking out in Left.
It was clear enough that he needed to be calmed down becuase my wife even said, "Wow, he's gonna lose it out there, look at him"


i know, and i agreed that after he walked castillo, it was clear that some words were definitely in order, im just saying i didnt think it that bad a call to let him finish that at-bat and see if he could finish off castillo. even after he walked castillo, the world hadnt yet ended, and certainly that was a time to settle him down, talk to him, see what was going on in there.

no argument from me, they stuck with prior too long. i just disagree that dusty needed to go out at that moment, in the middle of a long AB.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102689
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Regardless of what happened in game 6, they crapped down thier pantleg and pissed away a lead in game 7.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7396
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Regardless of what happened in game 6, they crapped down thier pantleg and pissed away a lead in game 7.
THAT is the game i fault Dusty for the most. Dave Veres should NEVER pitch in game 7 of ANY series ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:59 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102689
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I blame the players more than anything for 2003. I'm not saying Dusty did everything right, but the Cub had several chances to put the Marlins to bed in that series and the failed to execute on the field each and every time.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:13 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102689
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
The Cubs haven't won 90+ games in years.

Cub fans should be blaming Dusty for missing the playoffs in 2004 rather than leaving early in 2003. A complete and total meltdown worrying about what was said in the broadcast booth, and other things off the field is what was the problem then. That is something the manager could have and should have stopped.

I think its hilarious that people are still getting all up in arms over Dusty Baker. Who gives a shit? I certainly wouldn't care if Jerry Manuel was managing again. This Cub team has the potential to go further than any of Baker's teams could have dreamed of. Worry about that and forget about what could have been in 2003.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
Well, if management believed after a couple of years that Dusty was a bad hire and a bad fit and they didn't want to keep him then it shouldn't be a surprise that they decided not to give him the property support. That's why the GM and upper level people took a beating too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66237
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
I think its hilarious that people are still getting all up in arms over Dusty Baker.

We're not, actually. This is in response to the media feeding frenzy that has been the return of the Trusty One. I am really really happy he's managing in the division, becuase that takes a good team out of the picture as far as I'm concerned.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:16 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102689
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
I didn't specify. Media, message board posters, fans....people are still getting worked up about this foolishness.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:15 pm
Posts: 2014
Location: In a slightly better place than before each day I remember where I'm going
pizza_Place: My house. I make a good pizza according to my family. I'll take it.
Frank Coztansa wrote:
The Cubs haven't won 90+ games in years.

Cub fans should be blaming Dusty for missing the playoffs in 2004 rather than leaving early in 2003. A complete and total meltdown worrying about what was said in the broadcast booth, and other things off the field is what was the problem then. That is something the manager could have and should have stopped.

I think its hilarious that people are still getting all up in arms over Dusty Baker. Who gives a shit? I certainly wouldn't care if Jerry Manuel was managing again. This Cub team has the potential to go further than any of Baker's teams could have dreamed of. Worry about that and forget about what could have been in 2003.


You seem to be getting your rocks off about it and the subsequent discussion. I find it terribly amusing. Nothing can be done about it, so why discuss it? So people can find something else to wring their hands about (or mock others about)?

Asinine.

_________________
Stupidity irritates the crap outta me... and yes, I irritate myself far too often.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 11:11 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102689
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
kerchungathunk wrote:
You seem to be getting your rocks off about it and the subsequent discussion. I find it terribly amusing. Nothing can be done about it, so why discuss it? So people can find something else to wring their hands about (or mock others about)?

Asinine.


You should direct this comment to your Cub fan bretherin and/or the media. Or, the people who have more than just 3 or 4 posts on this matter.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group