bigfan wrote:
Fine, he is a great player for a 71 win team. Happy?
If you had a team that might contend, would you be ok with him as your 5th OF, especially in the NL?
Down 1 in the 7th, pinch hitter gets on, Otis Nixon would steal 2nd and 3rd and score on a deep fly. The value of that type of player is unique, to a team that is competing for a title and every game matters.
A team rebuilding and going to be in 3rd , at the very best and wanting to see other players in the OF.
So as far as my 5th OF's go, he is a GREAT 5th OF for a competing team.
NUH UH.... 2001 CALLED, IT WANTS ITS ARGUMENTS BACK. IT'S ALL ABOUT WAR.
Remember Dave Roberts' clutch baserunning in the 2004 ALCS? 0.3 WAR for Boston in 45 games. His ALCS was 0/2 with 2R and 1SB. HE. DIDN'T. EVEN. PLAY. IN. THE. WORLD. SERIES.
Who's to say that they don't let Kevin Millar (2.5 WAR) run the bases and his lack of SB threat causes the pitch sequence to change and a pitch slightly slips out of Rivera's hand and we get a big dramatic 2 run HR? Since Millar was worth 2.5 replacement players and, by definition, Dave Roberts was essentially a replacement player, Francona made the wrong move pinch running for Millar, which again clearly would have resulted in a game-winning 2R HR.
In other words, my argument makes no sense whatsoever and basically I just wanted to lampoon the concept that you're wrong because hi-tech statistics say that certain players are better than others because of the #s, and I, for one, wait with bated breath for the day that that weird Baxter computer with a creepy "face" gets a chance to manage ballgames and W/Ls are no longer subject to fluky crap like "luck" because Pythagoreas was the greatest baseball mind to never live within a few hundred years of the game.
Excuse me while I go vote for SHARK and Jack in the Box tacos for the B&B HOF, aka radio unobtainium.
_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?