It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:37 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:29 pm
Posts: 33998
leashyourkids wrote:
Beardown wrote:
spanky wrote:
Darkside wrote:
What year is this?

Somebody should hot carl in beardown's mouth


What does that mean?


It's the same thing you do to your white women.


Cry after they slap me?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Stop being modest BD.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jul 26, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 4:59 am
Posts: 283
Location: South (frickin') Bend. Dan Devine was here!
pizza_Place: Bruno's
My dad was an ardent Cubs fan from the late 1930s and up. I don't think the Maddux trade disturbed him all that much -- because at that time, he had so much respect for Greg that he wanted him to have a chance to improve himself and go on to championships.

Things like Lou Brock's success likely bugged him though -- anytime the Cards' sucesses came at the Cubs' expense, it really tended to frost his balls. He was hopeful the Cubs would pick up Ron Fairly from them (1976) but it never happened.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 9:44 pm
Posts: 334
To anyone of my generation, Brock + '69 Cubs = World Series win and we would have been saved the years of annoying stories about the Miracle Mets.

Maddux was great and the Cubs should have kept him, but the loss of Brock was exponentially more damaging. The '69 Cubs had 4 HOF players and a HOF manager. Maddux would not have had that kind of support at Wrigley.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91929
Location: To the left of my post
Juicer. Who cares.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:54 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Wanderer wrote:
To anyone of my generation, Brock + '69 Cubs = World Series win and we would have been saved the years of annoying stories about the Miracle Mets.

Maddux was great and the Cubs should have kept him, but the loss of Brock was exponentially more damaging. The '69 Cubs had 4 HOF players and a HOF manager. Maddux would not have had that kind of support at Wrigley.


Yeah, Cub fans cry more about Brock than they ever have about Maddux. But I'm not sure how anyone thinks you could have had Brock and Williams in the same outfield. Balls would have been bouncing off the top of their heads with regularity.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Just step away from whatever your allegiance might be and consider a team not resigning a 26 year old who had averaged 17 wins per year over the last 5 and was the reigning Cy Young.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Also, the whole space time continuum would have been different and we'd be living in a different reality. So this thread is moot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:26 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just step away from whatever your allegiance might be and consider a team not resigning a 26 year old who had averaged 17 wins per year over the last 5 and was the reigning Cy Young.


Yeah, it was goddamn dumb in retrospect. But Larry Himes was a sharp guy. He may have been the most important guy in Cooperstown yesterday what with his influence on the careers of Maddux and Frank. I think he looked at Maddux and couldn't believe he could really keep doing what he was doing. This little guy who didn't throw hard. Guys like that are underestimated. Nobody I know considers Maddux a strikeout pitcher, but he struck out way more than many guys who are defined by their ability to strike guys out. Chicks dig the fastball. So do general managers.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just step away from whatever your allegiance might be and consider a team not resigning a 26 year old who had averaged 17 wins per year over the last 5 and was the reigning Cy Young.


Yeah, it was goddamn dumb in retrospect. But Larry Himes was a sharp guy. He may have been the most important guy in Cooperstown yesterday what with his influence on the careers of Maddux and Frank. I think he looked at Maddux and couldn't believe he could really keep doing what he was doing. This little guy who didn't throw hard. Guys like that are underestimated. Nobody I know considers Maddux a strikeout pitcher, but he struck out way more than many guys who are defined by their ability to strike guys out. Chicks dig the fastball. So do general managers.

If he had only been doing it for 1 or 2 years I could see that thinking. But it was already 5 straight years of dominance.

I dont think it was that Himes didnt want to keep him. Trib didnt want to pay.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79461
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just step away from whatever your allegiance might be and consider a team not resigning a 26 year old who had averaged 17 wins per year over the last 5 and was the reigning Cy Young.


Yeah, it was goddamn dumb in retrospect. But Larry Himes was a sharp guy. He may have been the most important guy in Cooperstown yesterday what with his influence on the careers of Maddux and Frank. I think he looked at Maddux and couldn't believe he could really keep doing what he was doing. This little guy who didn't throw hard. Guys like that are underestimated. Nobody I know considers Maddux a strikeout pitcher, but he struck out way more than many guys who are defined by their ability to strike guys out. Chicks dig the fastball. So do general managers.

If he had only been doing it for 1 or 2 years I could see that thinking. But it was already 5 straight years of dominance.

I dont think it was that Himes didnt want to keep him. Trib didnt want to pay.


But they ended up giving more money to the other two turds they signed. I think it was a pissing match with early Boras. When you look at the money it was over now, it seems comical.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just step away from whatever your allegiance might be and consider a team not resigning a 26 year old who had averaged 17 wins per year over the last 5 and was the reigning Cy Young.


Yeah, it was goddamn dumb in retrospect. But Larry Himes was a sharp guy. He may have been the most important guy in Cooperstown yesterday what with his influence on the careers of Maddux and Frank. I think he looked at Maddux and couldn't believe he could really keep doing what he was doing. This little guy who didn't throw hard. Guys like that are underestimated. Nobody I know considers Maddux a strikeout pitcher, but he struck out way more than many guys who are defined by their ability to strike guys out. Chicks dig the fastball. So do general managers.

If he had only been doing it for 1 or 2 years I could see that thinking. But it was already 5 straight years of dominance.

I dont think it was that Himes didnt want to keep him. Trib didnt want to pay.


But they ended up giving more money to the other two turds they signed. I think it was a pissing match with early Boras. When you look at the money it was over now, it seems comical.

I know it was like a couple mil but ya gotta look relative to other deals at the time.

Here's a decent article. Maddux was a good influence on the older pitchers :lol:
http://espn.go.com/chicago/mlb/story/_/id/10264400/letting-greg-maddux-leave-was-hall-fame-blunder-chicago-cubs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Maddux shit the bed in the '89 playoffs against the Giants. God forbid if Rozner ever brought that fact up when sucking his ass during a what seems like a weekly "kiss his ring" column. Theo would have let him go too.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
jimmypasta wrote:
Maddux shit the bed in the '89 playoffs against the Giants. God forbid if Rozner ever brought that fact up when sucking his ass during a what seems like a weekly "kiss his ring" column. Theo would have let him go too.

Theo would have locked him up in 89


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group