It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 6:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 347 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
What possible blowback will this have? The percentage of minorities attending Cubs games is very low. The demand for tickets is very high. If the small percentage of fans that are of minority background decide not to buy tickets because of this, the tickets will be swooped up by others quickly. All this will have had no effect, other than to possibly decrease the already low minority population at the ballpark.


Why must you ruin everything?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Its interesting though that Muslims, maybe for good reason, are a protected group now.


People are still free to rip evangelicals and scientoligists without a problem.


And Catholics. Really any religion is fair game unless it's Islam.

I see people complaining about catholics getting ripped all the time though.

With the two I mentioned, its like completely accepted to rip them and no one says shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
What possible blowback will this have? The percentage of minorities attending Cubs games is very low. The demand for tickets is very high. If the small percentage of fans that are of minority background decide not to buy tickets because of this, the tickets will be swooped up by others quickly. All this will have had no effect, other than to possibly decrease the already low minority population at the ballpark.


That is why my thought is this is nothing substantial. It is just a way for people that disagree with Ricketts having his thoughts to try to get their pound of flesh.


An exercise in futility, since he has no position in the Cubs organization from which to be suspended or fired. There is no real way to get that pound of flesh.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Its interesting though that Muslims, maybe for good reason, are a protected group now.


People are still free to rip evangelicals and scientoligists without a problem.


And Catholics. Really any religion is fair game unless it's Islam.

I see people complaining about catholics getting ripped all the time though.

With the two I mentioned, its like completely accepted to rip them and no one says shit.


Idk maybe the majority always take the arrows?

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
What possible blowback will this have? The percentage of minorities attending Cubs games is very low. The demand for tickets is very high. If the small percentage of fans that are of minority background decide not to buy tickets because of this, the tickets will be swooped up by others quickly. All this will have had no effect, other than to possibly decrease the already low minority population at the ballpark.


That is why my thought is this is nothing substantial. It is just a way for people that disagree with Ricketts having his thoughts to try to get their pound of flesh.


An exercise in futility, since he has no position in the Cubs organization from which to be suspended or fired. There is no real way to get that pound of flesh.


It makes media, talk shows and message boards move though I guess.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
In defense of Joe Ricketts, all the really bilious stuff was coming from someone else's fingertips, Joe was either just forwarding it or replying "lol good one" to glorified Cheap Charlie posts.


but he has put his money into the politicizing of these ideas


Not sure that’s fair and I am also not sure why I am defending a Cub owner. His money goes to political support. Those causes and candidates are likely varied with many positions. I doubt he supports “Evict Every Muslim”.

Wouldnt you want to evict your natural enemy?

Im not even mad at Ricketts but come on, man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


1. Oh I was limiting this to Ricketts
2. But he is not.
3. Makes no difference.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 10:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
In defense of Joe Ricketts, all the really bilious stuff was coming from someone else's fingertips, Joe was either just forwarding it or replying "lol good one" to glorified Cheap Charlie posts.


but he has put his money into the politicizing of these ideas


Not sure that’s fair and I am also not sure why I am defending a Cub owner. His money goes to political support. Those causes and candidates are likely varied with many positions. I doubt he supports “Evict Every Muslim”.

Wouldnt you want to evict your natural enemy?

Im not even mad at Ricketts but come on, man.


Maybe but I doubt he sends checks to groups doing that. Just guessing though. It probably would have come out before some old emails.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


1. Oh I was limiting this to Ricketts
2. But he is not.
3. Makes no difference.

Ok, mike, The Ricketts have nothing to do with government. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


His SON is governor. So if Pete Ricketts sent the emails it would be significant. A retired philanthropist is a very different story. He is not subject to the same scrutiny. If people don't like or agree with his thoughts and opinions, too bad.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
leashyourkids wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
What possible blowback will this have? The percentage of minorities attending Cubs games is very low. The demand for tickets is very high. If the small percentage of fans that are of minority background decide not to buy tickets because of this, the tickets will be swooped up by others quickly. All this will have had no effect, other than to possibly decrease the already low minority population at the ballpark.


Why must you ruin everything?


These(WallPaperSteve) are "your people" now, Leash.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Hell, I hope there are a bunch of bleeding heart liberals that can't stand the idea of supporting the Cubs now and will no longer go to Cubs games and want to sell their tickets. More good tickets available......okay with me.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


His SON is governor. So if Pete Ricketts sent the emails it would be significant. A retired philanthropist is a very different story. He is not subject to the same scrutiny. If people don't like or agree with his thoughts and opinions, too bad.

You dont even know what you're arguing here. Im not advocating for anything to be done to Joe Ricketts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38675
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
pittmike wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
In defense of Joe Ricketts, all the really bilious stuff was coming from someone else's fingertips, Joe was either just forwarding it or replying "lol good one" to glorified Cheap Charlie posts.


but he has put his money into the politicizing of these ideas


Not sure that’s fair and I am also not sure why I am defending a Cub owner. His money goes to political support. Those causes and candidates are likely varied with many positions. I doubt he supports “Evict Every Muslim”.

Again, so what ? What’s the difference between Ricketts doing that and any other rich person donating money to politicians who push their agenda ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
badrogue17 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
In defense of Joe Ricketts, all the really bilious stuff was coming from someone else's fingertips, Joe was either just forwarding it or replying "lol good one" to glorified Cheap Charlie posts.


but he has put his money into the politicizing of these ideas


Not sure that’s fair and I am also not sure why I am defending a Cub owner. His money goes to political support. Those causes and candidates are likely varied with many positions. I doubt he supports “Evict Every Muslim”.

Again, so what ? What’s the difference between Ricketts doing that and any other rich person donating money to politicians who push their agenda ?


Right. Or for that matter, non-wealthy people. Donating to campaigns does not make one part of "government." He is not elected, and he is not a public "servant."

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Laura Ricketts eats the Bush and campaigned for Hillary. This is the Cub's ownership get out of jail free card. Bottom line. End of story.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31558
pizza_Place: What??
You don't change minds by stepping on throats. All that accomplishes is entrenchment, resistance, and resentment. That's not to say bigotry shouldn't be brought out into the light. People change their minds individually, not collectively. Collectivism breeds collectivism and once that happens, everybody is in a bubble. If a guy is racist and breaks no laws, by definition he is law abiding. I don't know what more you can ask in a country with individual rights and freedoms. This world isn't Utopia, will never be.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
leashyourkids wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
pittmike wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
In defense of Joe Ricketts, all the really bilious stuff was coming from someone else's fingertips, Joe was either just forwarding it or replying "lol good one" to glorified Cheap Charlie posts.


but he has put his money into the politicizing of these ideas


Not sure that’s fair and I am also not sure why I am defending a Cub owner. His money goes to political support. Those causes and candidates are likely varied with many positions. I doubt he supports “Evict Every Muslim”.

Again, so what ? What’s the difference between Ricketts doing that and any other rich person donating money to politicians who push their agenda ?


Right. Or for that matter, non-wealthy people. Donating to campaigns does not make one part of "government." He is not elected, and he is not a public "servant."

You think everyone who is in governemnt has an official title or office? Bit of a technicality isnt it?

There are many unofficial advisors that have no official title that are impacting every decision. Roger Stone is not a public servant but he is as responsible for Trump's agenda as anyone.


If you're just saying you cant hold him responsible like an elected official, I agree, but super pacs, donors and lobbyists affect our government as much or more than people who are actual public servants.

So circling back to my point. It matters. So it's reasonable for me to say "that SuperPac is run by a racist or anti semitic and it's informing his decisions." so take that into account when you vote or donate yourself.

No one is saying to arrest him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
You don't change minds by stepping on throats. All that accomplishes is entrenchment, resistance, and resentment. That's not to say bigotry shouldn't be brought out into the light. People change their minds individually, not collectively. Collectivism breeds collectivism and once that happens, everybody is in a bubble. If a guy is racist and breaks no laws, by definition he is law abiding. I don't know what more you can ask in a country with individual rights and freedoms. This world isn't Utopia, will never be.

People get punished in sports all the time with no law broken.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.


I think most people probably agree with that even though it's never going to happen.

The older I get, the more I think about how all I can do is control myself and hope to be a role model for others. I cannot coerce other people into acting or believing the way I do, with or without government. Maybe persuade them, but that is all. That's not to say I've never tried to brow beat people into submission and label them; we all have. But it doesn't work and is somewhat authoritarian.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31558
pizza_Place: What??
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.

You don't have to lay back and enjoy it. You have freedom of association. When you join a collective to police thought, to police it without any laws being broken, you are intolerant.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.


I think most people probably agree with that even though it's never going to happen.

The older I get, the more I think about how all I can do is control myself and hope to be a role model for others. I cannot coerce other people into acting or believing the way I do, with or without government. Maybe persuade them, but that is all. That's not to say I've never tried to brow beat people into submission and label them; we all have. But it doesn't work and is somewhat authoritarian.
I don't think ignoring it does any good though. This is ultimately the free market at work. When you are a public figure you open yourself up to criticism of your ideas that I think everyone can agree were not great.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.


I think most people probably agree with that even though it's never going to happen.

The older I get, the more I think about how all I can do is control myself and hope to be a role model for others. I cannot coerce other people into acting or believing the way I do, with or without government. Maybe persuade them, but that is all. That's not to say I've never tried to brow beat people into submission and label them; we all have. But it doesn't work and is somewhat authoritarian.
I don't think ignoring it does any good though. This is ultimately the free market at work. When you are a public figure you open yourself up to criticism of your ideas that I think everyone can agree were not great.


I have no issue with people doing that - voting with their wallets. I can pretty much guarantee you this will have zero effect on Cubs revenue, however.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nardi wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Also, re: bigotry

I kind of think we should all try and get along on this planet as much as possible. Just from a Humanity standpoint, I want there to be less bigotry.

Im not going to just lay back and enjoy it.

You don't have to lay back and enjoy it. You have freedom of association. When you join a collective to police thought, to police it without any laws being broken, you are intolerant.

What if someone is ignorant/uninformed and you shed some light on something that changes their opinion? Is that policing thought?

And is there any limit? I mean do we have to be tolerant of other people's intolerance?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


1. Oh I was limiting this to Ricketts
2. But he is not.
3. Makes no difference.

Ok, mike, The Ricketts have nothing to do with government. :lol:


As far as free speech goes he doesn't. Not anymore than Joe Kennedy was for his sons.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
pittmike wrote:

Ricketts isn’t in government.

#1 My comment was not limited to Ricketts, leash and I were discussing it on larger scale.
#2 Ricketts runs one of most powerful PACS in the country. He is very much involved in government.
#3 His son Pete is Governor of Nebraska


1. Oh I was limiting this to Ricketts
2. But he is not.
3. Makes no difference.

Ok, mike, The Ricketts have nothing to do with government. :lol:


As far as free speech goes he doesn't. Not anymore than Joe Kennedy was for his sons.

Im not trying to limit his speech at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40616
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
You don't change minds by stepping on throats. All that accomplishes is entrenchment, resistance, and resentment. That's not to say bigotry shouldn't be brought out into the light. People change their minds individually, not collectively. Collectivism breeds collectivism and once that happens, everybody is in a bubble. If a guy is racist and breaks no laws, by definition he is law abiding. I don't know what more you can ask in a country with individual rights and freedoms. This world isn't Utopia, will never be.

People get punished in sports all the time with no law broken.


It is a long discussion I am not willing to have but I do not think that is a good thing.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2019 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91933
Location: To the left of my post
pittmike wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nardi wrote:
You don't change minds by stepping on throats. All that accomplishes is entrenchment, resistance, and resentment. That's not to say bigotry shouldn't be brought out into the light. People change their minds individually, not collectively. Collectivism breeds collectivism and once that happens, everybody is in a bubble. If a guy is racist and breaks no laws, by definition he is law abiding. I don't know what more you can ask in a country with individual rights and freedoms. This world isn't Utopia, will never be.

People get punished in sports all the time with no law broken.


It is a long discussion I am not willing to have but I do not think that is a good thing.
Oh, well if you aren't willing to discuss it then I guess that ends the discussion.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 347 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group