It is currently Fri Jun 06, 2025 12:20 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
JORR wrote:
Pitcher A has a .505 career winning percentage. Pitcher B has a .572 career winning percentage.
A is probably Jose Quintana. And its only because he got off to like a 4-0 or 5-1 start to this season that he is even over .500 for his career.

Dude made some bank though, props to him.

Because he can pitch a little bit. There's no reason to knock know how. It isn't done with Buehrle and the two aren't much different.


That is utterly absurd.

I have no doubt you believe that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 2:42 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
JORR wrote:
Pitcher A has a .505 career winning percentage. Pitcher B has a .572 career winning percentage.
A is probably Jose Quintana. And its only because he got off to like a 4-0 or 5-1 start to this season that he is even over .500 for his career.

Dude made some bank though, props to him.

Because he can pitch a little bit. There's no reason to knock know how. It isn't done with Buehrle and the two aren't much different.


That is utterly absurd.

I have no doubt you believe that.


One would have to be insane not to. One guy is a journeyman. The other is a borderline Hall of Famer.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
JORR wrote:
Pitcher A has a .505 career winning percentage. Pitcher B has a .572 career winning percentage.
A is probably Jose Quintana. And its only because he got off to like a 4-0 or 5-1 start to this season that he is even over .500 for his career.

Dude made some bank though, props to him.

Because he can pitch a little bit. There's no reason to knock know how. It isn't done with Buehrle and the two aren't much different.


That is utterly absurd.

I have no doubt you believe that.


One would have to be insane not to. One guy is a journeyman. The other is a borderline Hall of Famer.

They're both journeyman. Buehrle's definitely a better baseball player and competitor. But strictly pitch by pitch nuts and bolts from the rubber, not much difference. The edge is to Buehrle amongst those two journeyman pitchers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 5:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32463
pizza_Place: Milano's
Quintana sucks, Buerhle was awesome
Not really sure what the argument is here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26779
pizza_Place: Pizanos
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

Buehrle should be in the hall.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

They are both above average pitchers who I respect. A helluva lot more than than throwers who come and go. I'm not going to stay silent when a crafty pitcher with 14 years in the league gets shit on over a W/L record. Buehrle is a gamer and GGer and he pitched good. Quintana simply pitched good. There is not much difference in how they pitched. It's not a controversial statement. I will admit to one small thing. 2006. He took the year off on the favored team and so ended the HOF consideration. He would never again have a year like 2005. I mean, he was fine after the no show year, Quintana-like, I'd say.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

Buehrle should be in the hall.

Look at the fuzzy wuzzy soxie. Maybe put some plexiglass around Mark's empty beer cans?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26779
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Nardi wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

Buehrle should be in the hall.

Look at the fuzzy wuzzy soxie. Maybe put some plexiglass around Mark's empty beer cans?

Make it a big case and get the WS - all of it, all of 200(5 - the perfect game, the no-no…all of the gold gloves, the durability, the making-baseball-fun-to-watch-without-a-gay-pitch-clock…

Put him in.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 8:44 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

They are both above average pitchers who I respect. A helluva lot more than than throwers who come and go. I'm not going to stay silent when a crafty pitcher with 14 years in the league gets shit on over a W/L record.


He's responsible for that record. He's played on plenty of good teams. It's not a "lack of run support." He often can't make his pitch at critical junctures. Buehrle usually did.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2025 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 24695
pizza_Place: It's gone
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
JORR wrote:
That's just completely wrong. I wouldn't put Buehrle in the Hall but he's close. Quintana is just a slightly better than average pitcher.

There really is no comparison between the two guys. Buehrle is like Jim Kaat. Quintana is like Bud Black.

Buehrle should be in the hall.


yes. the stat nerds have completey ruined the baseball HOF. Guy's who were Hall of Good players for decades now get in because of some bullshit analytics math - Rolen, Simmons, Mauer, Dave Parker, etc... None of those guys when I saw playing WITH MY EYES I said to myself I'm watching a future baseball hall of famer. EVER!

Since the standard has been lowered, but in guys like Buehrle, Garvey, Bucker, Dale Murphy, etc... All these Hall of Good guys just put them in now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66360
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
JORR wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
JORR wrote:
enigma wrote:
As an older fella who grew up looking at the normal pitching stats, IP, runs, hits, K, BB, I am not big into the numbers that Marquee puts out for pitchers, strikeout percentage, walk percentage etc. I also get tired of Boog and his constant mentions of exit velocity. Then on Tuesday's game along with exit velocity he added launch angle on Kelly's near home run....I believe it was something like 26 degrees. Can we stop with the geometry.


There's nothing wrong with those statistics. The disconnect comes when someone insists that certain statistics make a guy a good pitcher.

I mean it says something that Nolan Ryan is the most difficult guy to hit. But there's more to pitching ballgames than simply being the hardest guy to hit. Only an idiot would argue that Ryan was a better pitcher than Greg Maddux.


After your epic flop on Pete Crow Allstar, I thought you would have excused yourself from future baseball discussions



Don't get so excited about a good month. I remember when Cub fans thought Steve Dillard was the second coming of Christ. It's what Cub fans do. We've all seen this show before. You never learn.

Lol jorr... I remember a few you thought were elite too. Thats what Sox fans do. We've seen this show before. You never learn.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66360
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
RFDC wrote:
JORR wrote:
Yep. Schwarber is one of the most monumental busts in the history of sports. He'll go down with LaRue Martin and Tim Couch as a generational turd.

:lol: :lol:

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 12:17 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57740
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66360
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

One of the most monumental busts in the history of sports. Let's give him credit where credit is due

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

Also to be fair, JORR doesn't think much of Pete Rose as a player. Mark Buehrle is probably better.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 1:42 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25381
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Darkside wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

One of the most monumental busts in the history of sports. Let's give him credit where credit is due


They can’t all be Morganna the Kissing Bandit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 3:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

Also to be fair, JORR doesn't think much of Pete Rose as a player. Mark Buehrle is probably better.



Pete Rose was an excellent singles hitter. I deduct points for false hustle. I know it's his shitty culture that caused him to showboat by sprinting out walks.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 4:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2018 9:43 am
Posts: 2740
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
JORR wrote:
The Division wrote:
JORR wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I like traditional stats too, but I think looking at OPS or talking about BABIP is important to understanding the value of the hitter.



BABIP is supposed to be a pitchers' stat, i.e. all balls in play normalize around .300 so if a pitcher's BABIP is much higher than that we might expect that he has gotten unlucky and better days are ahead for him or if it is much lower we should probably expect that he has not been as good as it may appear. BABIP does not "normalize" for hitters. Some guys hit 'em where they ain't. Some guys hit a lot of balls right at the shortstop.


This says it's both: https://library.fangraphs.com/pitching/babip/



Think about that for a minute. McCracken ran the numbers and they indicated that all pitchers, given a large enough sample, have a BABIP against that is right around .300. That is to say that the difference between you and Nolan Ryan is really only walks, strikeouts, and homeruns. That was oiginally hard for fans to accept, but the numbers don't lie.

On the other hand, it's clear that guys like Pete Rose or Matty Alou have radically higher BABIP than Ed Hermann or Don Kessinger. It isn't that they got lucky. They directed the ball where fielders weren't. They were also fast to first.


It does have some value as a hitting stat. Mike Tauchman has a .370 BABIP right now. Everyone knows he's not a .370 hitter. Therefore, everyone knows is current BA/OPS is based on luck/small sample size.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

Also to be fair, JORR doesn't think much of Pete Rose as a player. Mark Buehrle is probably better.



Pete Rose was an excellent singles hitter. I deduct points for false hustle. I know it's his shitty culture that caused him to showboat by sprinting out walks.

Quote:
The MLB career doubles leader is Tris Speaker with 792 career doubles. Other players with over 700 career doubles include Pete Rose (746), Stan Musial (725), and Ty Cobb (724).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 9:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

Also to be fair, JORR doesn't think much of Pete Rose as a player. Mark Buehrle is probably better.



Pete Rose was an excellent singles hitter. I deduct points for false hustle. I know it's his shitty culture that caused him to showboat by sprinting out walks.

Quote:
The MLB career doubles leader is Tris Speaker with 792 career doubles. Other players with over 700 career doubles include Pete Rose (746), Stan Musial (725), and Ty Cobb (724).



Could you look up the career leader in outs?

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 9:24 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Warren Newson wrote:
JORR wrote:
The Division wrote:
JORR wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I like traditional stats too, but I think looking at OPS or talking about BABIP is important to understanding the value of the hitter.



BABIP is supposed to be a pitchers' stat, i.e. all balls in play normalize around .300 so if a pitcher's BABIP is much higher than that we might expect that he has gotten unlucky and better days are ahead for him or if it is much lower we should probably expect that he has not been as good as it may appear. BABIP does not "normalize" for hitters. Some guys hit 'em where they ain't. Some guys hit a lot of balls right at the shortstop.


This says it's both: https://library.fangraphs.com/pitching/babip/



Think about that for a minute. McCracken ran the numbers and they indicated that all pitchers, given a large enough sample, have a BABIP against that is right around .300. That is to say that the difference between you and Nolan Ryan is really only walks, strikeouts, and homeruns. That was oiginally hard for fans to accept, but the numbers don't lie.

On the other hand, it's clear that guys like Pete Rose or Matty Alou have radically higher BABIP than Ed Hermann or Don Kessinger. It isn't that they got lucky. They directed the ball where fielders weren't. They were also fast to first.


It does have some value as a hitting stat. Mike Tauchman has a .370 BABIP right now. Everyone knows he's not a .370 hitter. Therefore, everyone knows is current BA/OPS is based on luck/small sample size.


That's not how BABIP works though. Tauchman isn't a .314 hitter because he isn't a .314 hitter. He has hit .314 over 35 AB at least once, probably more than once. He doesn't hit .314 over a large sample because he isn't that good.

BABIP is a pitchers' stat. BABIP normalizes around .300 for ALL pitchers, not for all batters.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 9:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2021 10:25 am
Posts: 1172
Location: Houston, Texas
pizza_Place: Sam’s - Oglesby, IL
JORR wrote:
Warren Newson wrote:
JORR wrote:
The Division wrote:
JORR wrote:
denisdman wrote:
I like traditional stats too, but I think looking at OPS or talking about BABIP is important to understanding the value of the hitter.



BABIP is supposed to be a pitchers' stat, i.e. all balls in play normalize around .300 so if a pitcher's BABIP is much higher than that we might expect that he has gotten unlucky and better days are ahead for him or if it is much lower we should probably expect that he has not been as good as it may appear. BABIP does not "normalize" for hitters. Some guys hit 'em where they ain't. Some guys hit a lot of balls right at the shortstop.


This says it's both: https://library.fangraphs.com/pitching/babip/



Think about that for a minute. McCracken ran the numbers and they indicated that all pitchers, given a large enough sample, have a BABIP against that is right around .300. That is to say that the difference between you and Nolan Ryan is really only walks, strikeouts, and homeruns. That was oiginally hard for fans to accept, but the numbers don't lie.

On the other hand, it's clear that guys like Pete Rose or Matty Alou have radically higher BABIP than Ed Hermann or Don Kessinger. It isn't that they got lucky. They directed the ball where fielders weren't. They were also fast to first.


It does have some value as a hitting stat. Mike Tauchman has a .370 BABIP right now. Everyone knows he's not a .370 hitter. Therefore, everyone knows is current BA/OPS is based on luck/small sample size.


That's not how BABIP works though. Tauchman isn't a .314 hitter because he isn't a .314 hitter. He has hit .314 over 35 AB at least once, probably more than once. He doesn't hit .314 over a large sample because he isn't that good.

BABIP is a pitchers' stat. BABIP normalizes around .300 for ALL pitchers, not for all batters.


You obviously didn’t read the link I posted above.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 10:16 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
I did read it. But Piper Slowinski clearly doesn't understand the entire point of looking at BABIP. Every pitcher- with few exceptions- given a large enough sample will yield a BABIP of right around .300. The same isn't true for all batters.

If a pitcher is allowing BABIP of .350, we know he is catching some bad breaks that will even out over time. If he is allowing a BABIP of .200, we know he has gotten very lucky.

If a batter has a BABIP of .350, he may just be a great hitter.

https://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/pos ... d-the-game

Since McCracken's shocking, almost unbelievable discovery, more research has shown that balls in play aren't completely random. Knuckleballers in particular seem able to defy the .300 rule.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
JORR wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
To be fair, JORR did not call Schwarber a generational bust. He called him a monumental bust and a generational turd. Those are different things. Pete Rose was a great player and a generational turd.

Also to be fair, JORR doesn't think much of Pete Rose as a player. Mark Buehrle is probably better.



Pete Rose was an excellent singles hitter. I deduct points for false hustle. I know it's his shitty culture that caused him to showboat by sprinting out walks.

Quote:
The MLB career doubles leader is Tris Speaker with 792 career doubles. Other players with over 700 career doubles include Pete Rose (746), Stan Musial (725), and Ty Cobb (724).



Could you look up the career leader in outs?

Shocking the leader in PAs would have the most outs. 2nd in outs is Aaron. Does he suck too?

Rose was obviously a double machine. Led the league 5 times and puts him 4th all time in that category.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 10:29 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
I never said Rose "sucked." It's just silly to compare him to Mantle, Mays, or Aaron.

I have to wonder why you can recognize the correlation between most PA and most outs but not between most PA and most hits. He broke the record for outs well before he broke the record for hits, as I'm sure you are aware.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2025 11:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 34371
pizza_Place: What??
JORR wrote:
I never said Rose "sucked." It's just silly to compare him to Mantle, Mays, or Aaron.

I haven't done that. I just think Rose deserves more respect than a Cal Ripken, which is what you've been implying.
JORR wrote:
I have to wonder why you can recognize the correlation between most PA and most outs but not between most PA and most hits. He broke the record for outs well before he broke the record for hits, as I'm sure you are aware.

Because I knew you thought you had something there(just constantly walking up to the plate to get in the record book) but not much because Hank Aaron was #2 in outs and I imagine there's plenty of HOFers in the top 20.

Again, The "singles hitter" was a doubles machine. Address that rather than the fake hustle, he's an asshole, or the supposedly empty record that broke the one in a time guys wore a tiny mitt and hit .400 on the regular.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 12:27 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57740
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Back to Sciambi:

I caught some of the game on TV today and they were doing some sort of prop comedy in the booth with curly wigs. It should be noted that the game was in a scoreless tie in the 6th. Save it for blowouts. Don't cut to the booth over and over for Boog Sciambi's Comedy Capers late in a close game. Try concentrating on the game on the field.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
I just think Rose deserves more respect than a Cal Ripken


Why?

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2025 7:29 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81977
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Nardi wrote:
Again, The "singles hitter" was a doubles machine.


He wasn't a power hitter. That matters. I'm not sure why anyone would think Rose was a better hitter than say, Billy Williams, just off the top of my head.

I don't think Rose can be separated from his image which is a big part of what makes people say he's so great and which makes him controversial as well. If you're going to tell me your view on Rose is completely based on performance and has zero to do with the "Charlie Hustle- he played the game the 'right way'" persona, I'm gonna say I doubt it.

_________________
General Jim wears Fort Bragg down... to get it!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group