It is currently Fri Nov 15, 2024 5:00 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You keep saying that winning in '05 does nothing for teams in '09, etc. But then you try to have it both ways by claiming that the lack of success in later years is somehow indicative of 2005 being disappointing. I don't get it.

I never said 2005 was disappointing. Frank has taken one sentence out of one cohesive paragraph. Go read the post I made and you'll understand.

I read the post. I understand what you're saying. You don't understand that it's not logically consistent.

You've said that winning in '05 doesn't do anything for any future or past teams. But you're using the lack of success in future teams to indicate that the '05 team was somehow less than it was(call it good, serviceable, lucky, fluky, whatever). So either teams stand on their own merits of a particular season or it really is a total package.

the total tenure of Kenny Williams has been more successful than any other baseball GM in the city for the past combined 150+ years, yet if Theo duplicates his success it will be considered a failure. I do understand what you're saying when you say that but it doesn't make it any less baffling.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I know one thing. Unlike poor Louis Reinhart I will not be dying without seeing my team win a World Series.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
FavreFan wrote:
I read the post. I understand what you're saying. You don't understand that it's not logically consistent.

You've said that winning in '05 doesn't do anything for any future or past teams. But you're using the lack of success in future teams to indicate that the '05 team was somehow less than it was(call it good, serviceable, lucky, fluky, whatever). So either teams stand on their own merits of a particular season or it really is a total package.

the total tenure of Kenny Williams has been more successful than any other baseball GM in the city for the past combined 150+ years, yet if Theo duplicates his success it will be considered a failure. I do understand what you're saying when you say that but it doesn't make it any less baffling.

Alright - now I see where we're at.

You're not understanding where I'm coming from because you think all these things are connected, or you think I'm connecting them.

The 2005 World Series was awesome. Any World Series victory is awesome.

But then we've had threads where the White Sox over a period were being judged, and when White Sox fans were asked why they were so happy...2005 was brought up. 2005 makes the whole decade "great?" "Good?" No. 2005 makes 2005 great. 2005 doesn't make 2009 great, or the period from 2001-2014. It makes it "okay." Which is better than the Cubs from 2001-2014, but not as good as the Cardinals, let's say.

Then we had a different thread (or same thread on a different day) where we were judging Kenny Williams. Is Kenny William as a GM 'very skilled' because of one World Series over the course of how long of a tenture? Or should he actually be judged more harshly because as a GM he could not maintain a winning organization for a length of time greater than one year?

The 2005 White Sox were great. 99 Wins and 1 loss in the playoffs? Great.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48800
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
One World Series victory makes this century great.

I've already gone through one century without seeing it. Let's not get greedy.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
As a fan base, you have to get greedy or demanding. The last thing I want is a complacent organization.

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I dont think it would do any good to try to judge the "skill level" of any GM, especially one who is no longer active. It's a results oriented business. Of course teams like the Red Sox and Cardinals enjoyed more success than the Sox during Williams tenure. But just winning that one world series still puts him above almost any non World Series winning GM. It's the same reason why any criticism of Theo's Boston tenure ultimately rings a little hollow. Whether it was by draft loopholes, market inefficiencies, high paid FA, or whatever, he won two world series. It's impossible to label it anything other than an enormous success. His Cubs tenure should obviously be labeled an incomplete but he has put out last place teams three years out of three so far so he has his work cut out for him.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
No not all titles are the same

My detailed explanation in the quoted thread still stands.

Thank you for the offer of ending this but I must decline.


Were gladiators Rick


That's not something you can turn on and off like some...some radio
How does the 2005 season compare to most other titles that were won? Do you think the White Sox title would be in the bottom 20% of skillful jobs by the GM, or the top 20% of skillful jobs by the GM, or just in the middle?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 6:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Quote:
“Winning absolutely is something you want to do," Price told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "Being a part of something special is also something you want to do. You can take that to a first-place team. You could take that all the way to a last-place team like the Cubs. With the talent they have coming up they could be a very special team in a few years as well. That would probably be the coolest city to win a championship in. They haven't done it in I'm not sure how long. To do that there that would be the coolest city to win a championship in right now."

Slotting Price in the rotation in 2016 would be sweet. The money should be there as it's be been banked for the past 3 years.

This offseason I would target Justin Masterson. He's having a real shitty year as he's lost some mph off his fastball. In the spring he proposed the following:
Quote:
According to the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, Masterson has asked the Indians for a three or four year extension in the range of $40 to $60 million. I think we can safely assume that a three year deal would be closer to the $40 million figure and a four year deal would be closer to $60 million.

He's a sinkerball pitcher who is a quiet leader type in the clubhouse. The cat is very religous. If he adjusts his ask enough I'd be very interested in a 3-year deal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I've heard the Masterson rumors as well. I think that is who they pick up. He is a Theo draft pick too.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
No not all titles are the same

My detailed explanation in the quoted thread still stands.

Thank you for the offer of ending this but I must decline.


Were gladiators Rick


That's not something you can turn on and off like some...some radio
How does the 2005 season compare to most other titles that were won? Do you think the White Sox title would be in the bottom 20% of skillful jobs by the GM, or the top 20% of skillful jobs by the GM, or just in the middle?

We've already had this argument. I really dont want to re write it.

Some championship teams have more of an "everything coming together" season than others. The White Sox had a lot of things come together.

It was a real good job by kenny that involved several calculated gambles working out


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
It should be a pretty simple question to answer. Your non-answer leads me to believe that you think that the job by Kenny was one of the least skillful performances for a World Series GM. Otherwise, you'd say that it was pretty much average.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It should be a pretty simple question to answer. Your non-answer leads me to believe that you think that the job by Kenny was one of the least skillful performances for a World Series GM. Otherwise, you'd say that it was pretty much average.

As usual you want things to be black and white but they arent.


He did a very good job that year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
As usual you want things to be black and white but they arent.
No, I'm doing the opposite of black and white. I'm asking for a percentage with many different available answers.

You can't just say "black and white" as an answer to everything you don't want to admit. Your non-answer is an answer. It truly is an easy question.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
As usual you want things to be black and white but they arent.
No, I'm doing the opposite of black and white. I'm asking for a percentage with many different available answers.

You can't just say "black and white" as an answer to everything you don't want to admit. Your non-answer is an answer. It truly is an easy question.

No, you're doing black and white like you always do. You try to break everything down to a Yes No answer as if all things are always equal, but they're not.

There are gray areas. Kenny Williams didnt have Steinbrenner money to work with. He also didnt have Billy Beane's limitations. Its hard to compare each title.

But you act as if its easy. As if I have an opinion ready on every GM that ever won a WS and a list with Kenny ranked.

He did a good job. I have no idea where it ranks all time, that would take a crazy amount of research. It is the opposite of an easy question.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:36 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
immessedup17 wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You keep saying that winning in '05 does nothing for teams in '09, etc. But then you try to have it both ways by claiming that the lack of success in later years is somehow indicative of 2005 being disappointing. I don't get it.

I never said 2005 was disappointing. Frank has taken one sentence out of one cohesive paragraph. Go read the post I made and you'll understand.
The paragraph stated that to you, one WS title would be failure. The Cubs haven't won a title since 1908, and haven't played in a WS game since 1945. And you want Theo to come in and start winning them left and right? Asinine. Idiotic. Moronic. Sure all teams fans want them to win all the time. Cubs fans especially should start with ONE and then see what happens.

Saying shit like that you come off an arrogant little shit. If you aren't trolling (which is exactly what Juiced does) it can only be that.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:41 am 
Online
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79458
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
immessedup17 wrote:
Which is better than the Cubs from 2001-2014, but not as good as the Cardinals, let's say.


I'm not even sure that's true. The 2006 Cardinals might be the worst World Series winner ever. They certainly weren't as good as the 2006 White Sox who embarrassed them on national television and scored something like 50 runs against them in a three game series that year. I'd have to say 2006 is advantage Kenny in spite of the fluky outcome that ended the season.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Matthew, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
As usual you want things to be black and white but they arent.
No, I'm doing the opposite of black and white. I'm asking for a percentage with many different available answers.

You can't just say "black and white" as an answer to everything you don't want to admit. Your non-answer is an answer. It truly is an easy question.

No, you're doing black and white like you always do. You try to break everything down to a Yes No answer as if all things are always equal, but they're not.

There are gray areas. Kenny Williams didnt have Steinbrenner money to work with. He also didnt have Billy Beane's limitations. Its hard to compare each title.

But you act as if its easy. As if I have an opinion ready on every GM that ever won a WS and a list with Kenny ranked.

He did a good job. I have no idea where it ranks all time, that would take a crazy amount of research. It is the opposite of an easy question.
You seem to be selectively knowledgeable on the topic. I asked if Kenny did an above average, average, or below average job compared to other championship GMs. You'd think a guy who has mocked my baseball knowledge in the past wouldn't struggle so much with a question like that. If you can't answer that question, I think I have to start questioning whether you are capable of even analyzing the job Kenny did since you are struggling with the ability to give a loose approximation of where it stands among other recent winning GMs. This also seriously calls into question your ability to judge Theo's time in Boston.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38673
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
:lol: Goddamn , Bryan is getting the textbook definition of BRicked.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
Compared to other GMs who won recent titles, Kenny did an average job putting the team together.

YES OR NO?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
As usual you want things to be black and white but they arent.
No, I'm doing the opposite of black and white. I'm asking for a percentage with many different available answers.

You can't just say "black and white" as an answer to everything you don't want to admit. Your non-answer is an answer. It truly is an easy question.

No, you're doing black and white like you always do. You try to break everything down to a Yes No answer as if all things are always equal, but they're not.

There are gray areas. Kenny Williams didnt have Steinbrenner money to work with. He also didnt have Billy Beane's limitations. Its hard to compare each title.

But you act as if its easy. As if I have an opinion ready on every GM that ever won a WS and a list with Kenny ranked.

He did a good job. I have no idea where it ranks all time, that would take a crazy amount of research. It is the opposite of an easy question.
You seem to be selectively knowledgeable on the topic. I asked if Kenny did an above average, average, or below average job compared to other championship GMs. You'd think a guy who has mocked my baseball knowledge in the past wouldn't struggle so much with a question like that. If you can't answer that question, I think I have to start questioning whether you are capable of even analyzing the job Kenny did since you are struggling with the ability to give a loose approximation of where it stands among other recent winning GMs. This also seriously calls into question your ability to judge Theo's time in Boston.

:lol:

Selectively knowledgable? How bout not gonna bullshit my way thru something I couldnt possibly be sure of.

So Ive exposed your ridiculous question and you decide to troll it up

Just to prove how ridiculous it is, Ill ask you and anyone reading this how many world Series winning GM's they can even name. Id guess most here top out around 20.

Im sorry that Ive accurately pointed out that most of your baseball posts are trolling and you dont follow it as closely as you follow other sports (something you readily admit, except when I point it out)

You see everything in black and white. And I mean everything. You think there are two answers to the question. Either Kenny was masterfully skillful or he was completely lucky. You want me to pick one of these so you can attempt to use it against me in a silly Cubs Sox debate.

Since I refuse to answer your silly question (Keith Oblermann, who is literally a baseball historian would probably have to get back to you on it ) you're getting upset and lashing out with silly things like "because you dont know how Kenny Williams 2005 compares with Joe L. Brown's 1960, I have to question your baseball knowledge"


And again, Ive said multiple times Kenny did a good job. A real good job. That's not good enough for you. And you call me protective of Theo :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
badrogue17 wrote:
:lol: Goddamn , Bryan is getting the textbook definition of BRicked.

And as per usual, Im showing him how ridiculous he is.

As an aside, you're a casual fan. How would you rank World Series GM's of the 1960's vs the 1970's?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
While 2015 has slim pickings with likely only Lester/Shields/Scherzer as "young" TOR starters there looks to be a better selection in 2016 barring extensions being signed:
David Price
Rick Porcello
Jeff Samardzija
Mat Latos
Johnny Cueto
Jordan Zimmermann

There's a decent class of 3/4 starters in 2016 too:
Chad Billingsley
Yovani Gallardo
Ian Kennedy
Mike Leake
Kris Medlen

Porcello is a Boras guy so I'm assuming he's hitting free agency but who knows given Illitch is in DGAF mode.
Not sure Cincy can pay both Latos and Cueto especially since they have some nice pitching prospects waiting.
Shark is shark.
Zimmerman is getting another MRI. Stay away.

2. Price
2/3. Arrieta
4. Masterson
4. Hendricks
5. Wood/Straily/Beeler

Hopefully 1 of Pierce Johnson, Corey Black or Rob Zastryzny will be ready to provide starts too. With the volatility of pitching we need at least 6 solid starters and ideally 7.

I don't think Price will be a stud ace in two years with all the mileage his arm will have undergone by then but having a healthier Sabathia arc would be great. That's a solid A's like rotation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Compared to other GMs who won recent titles, Kenny did an average job putting the team together.

YES OR NO?


no

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82152
NOBODY has moved the meters at this place like dolphin since STU GOTZ left

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just to prove how ridiculous it is, Ill ask you and anyone reading this how many world Series winning GM's they can even name. Id guess most here top out around 20.
I said recent multiple times. I'm not asking you to compare it to the GM of the 1934 World Series winner.
rogers park bryan wrote:
You see everything in black and white. And I mean everything. You think there are two answers to the question. Either Kenny was masterfully skillful or he was completely lucky. You want me to pick one of these so you can attempt to use it against me in a silly Cubs Sox debate.
The question I asked has more than two answers! :lol: You picked a bad time to use this.
rogers park bryan wrote:
And again, Ive said multiple times Kenny did a good job. A real good job. That's not good enough for you. And you call me protective of Theo :lol:
For some reason, you aren't willing to say Kenny did an average job when compared to others.

It is nice of you to say winning the World Series was a "real good job" though. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
As an aside, you're a casual fan. How would you rank World Series GM's of the 1960's vs the 1970's?
Oh come on.

It's just not worth it any more.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
bigfan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Compared to other GMs who won recent titles, Kenny did an average job putting the team together.

YES OR NO?


no
Thank you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Just to prove how ridiculous it is, Ill ask you and anyone reading this how many world Series winning GM's they can even name. Id guess most here top out around 20.
I said recent multiple times. I'm not asking you to compare it to the GM of the 1934 World Series winner.

After I explained how ridiculous your question was you started saying recent.

In fact that is the first time you said recent, right there /\

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
You see everything in black and white. And I mean everything. You think there are two answers to the question. Either Kenny was masterfully skillful or he was completely lucky. You want me to pick one of these so you can attempt to use it against me in a silly Cubs Sox debate.
The question I asked has more than two answers! :lol: You picked a bad time to use this.

Dont be coy. We both know what you're doing. Youre question has two answers. Either he was above or below average. Saying average would be a non answer.

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It is nice of you to say winning the World Series was a "real good job" though. :lol:

Im sorry that my words are not strong enough for you.

I say the same thing about every GM who wins. You wont find me saying a GM did an "Awesome job" or anything like that.



So basically, I said Kenny gambled, this bothered you (even though its true and many Sox fans on this board have agreed with it) so you start going crazy lashing out at me and asking ridiculous questions because of a perceived slight at KW. :lol:

Dont ever call anyone here sensitive or any kind of homer again. Im telling you that your GM did a real good job winning the championship and you are taking that as insulting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 91927
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Dont be coy. We both know what you're doing. Youre question has two answers. Either he was above or below average. Saying average would be a non answer.
Saying average is my answer! :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Compared to other GMs who won recent titles, Kenny did an average job putting the team together.

YES OR NO?


no
Thank you.

Of course Kenny and Kenny alone signed Abreu, so maybe that was his makeup effort

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 137 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group