Puckhead wrote:
I think most of you know my position on Ron. I really love and respect the guy for what he does for JDRF, yet I think the guy is unprofessional and a horrible analyst. My one problem continues to be, does the guy really deserve to be in the Hall of Fame? I never saw him play, so I am stuck with stats. One article tells you that if you go off sabermetrics, he was invaluable to his team in terms of fielding and walks. When I look at his stats, I see an average to above average player, at best. His BA is .277. Now, I realize BA is not everything as Mike Schmidt had a .267 average; however, Schmidt had over 500 HRs. I think Baseball Reference really knocks it out of the park for me. If you subscribe to Bill James numbers, he is below average on every test. The batters he is most similar to? Dale Murphy? Adrian Beltre? Ken Boyer?
That all being said, I want to end this argument, once and for all, right here, right now. Please, convince me one way or the other.
Good post. I am in the same situation, never saw this guy play, was just being born at the time, but guys like my dad and his generation of cub fans OF COURSE say he's the second coming at 3rd base. But like you mentioned, when you look at the #'s it's average. And the first few times he was on the ballot I guess he didnt even get that # of votes.
I know #'s dont tell the whole story, but it's hard for me to go off guys like my dad's generation where that loser 1969 team is the greatest team of all time when they didnt win shit. It sort of blows any credibility I have when I hear that crap about that team from guys from that generation ..... i.e. Mike Murphy.
Sadly, if he gets in, it'll be when he's gone. Santo knows it too. Thats the way the Veterns Committee works, and Santo's their bitch.