muman89 wrote:
I said KW should shop Jenks, I wasn't saying "trade Jenks immediately". Big difference there.
That said, he absolutely should shop Jenks. It doesn't hurt him at all to shop him around. The Sox don't have many tradeabele assets at the major league level right now, and Jenks is one of them.
KW and the Sox have been great at not just scouting around baseball, but scouting their own players. Jenks is still a very good closer (don't get me wrong), but with pitchers especially, you need to know when it's time to sell.
He'll be 28 next year, his velocity is down, he was on the DL this year, fewest strikeout total among all closers with 30 or more saves, arbitration eligible this off season.
I like having him on the Sox, he's still a very good closer (not top 5 in baseball by any means). If the Brewers or Mets call and offer me something good, I'm sure as heck listening if I'm Kenny. To think you would get Longoria or a Sizemore type player is crazy. Closer is one of the positions in baseball where you can find "a guy". See Jenks, Bobby, 2005 season.
First off, you can't just find a closer. Saying that is like the Bears saying they can "find" a QB. Do you remember the Billy Koch era? Shingo? You might be able to find a guy for a season or part of a season. But, to find a guy that is top 5 year in and year out is just as hard as it is to find a top flight starter.Ask the Mets and Brewers how that goes? If Bobby Jenks is on any of these teams, they might still be playing. Better yet, ask Braves fans about how a closer by comittee worked from 93-00. One of the reasons they constantly wet themselves in October is that they always lacked a real closer. Their pen is always in flux. When did the Sox pen fall apart? When Jenks went down...Jenks has really blown maybe a dozen games since he took over in 05. His save percentage is among the best in baseball every year. He is actually more effective now than he was in 05 when he threw the ball 101. He has great command and knows how to battle.
He is not a top 5 closer in baseball...show me 5 that you would rather have?
Pappelbon
Nathan
Rivera
K-Rod..thats it.
You could make a case for Brad Lidge, but anyone that gives up 2 back-breaking HRs in post season games in less than a week would not be in my bullpen, especially when one is to Scott Pods.
What do these guys have in common? They have been good for a while and their teams are in contention every year. Teams without solid closers do not contend year in and year out, ask the Tigers. If there is one guy that was important to the Yankee dynasty it was Mo. If you put some mediocre closer on the Twins, they are ordinary every year. I would even probably rather have Jenks than K-Rod. It is not exactly difficult to get 60 saves when you get 70 chances. Also, the Angels were up by double digits since about June. Where is the pressure?
Jenks was very effective down the stretch in 05 (except for game 2) and pretty solid in 06. He blew one game down the stretch that I can remember this year (to the Twins at the dome, but he was not exactly given a great situation).
No one is untouchable, but unless you can get an ALL STAR position player in his prime AND a quality replacement, trading Jenks is stupid. Other than Danks, Floyd, and maybe Buerhle, he is your most important guy. You simply will not get market value for him.