It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 11:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3602 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 121  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92103
Location: To the left of my post
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Except there are 12 qualified MLB starters right now that average 6 RS/9 or better, and 30 that average 5 or better. The White Sox as a team average below 4, and average just more than 3 runs per 9 when Quintana is on the hill.

The White Sox offense is in the bottom half of the MLB in AVG, bottom-3rd in OBP, and bottom-quartile in SLG. It is the offense that sucks when Quintana is pitching, not the opposing pitcher being really good. If it were indeed that Quintana is just "bested" by better pitchers every time out, we would expect to see the Sox as an above-average team shut down by a great starter. They are not, they are a well-below-average offensive team.
What are the numbers?

In games that Quintana pitches, how much does he lower their runs scored from their average and how much does the opposing pitcher lower the runs scored of the White Sox?

The whole argument here is that the Sox, who are a bad offense, are even worse with Quintana pitching for some strange reason. The likely answer is that the other pitcher is outperforming him by shutting down the offense more than expected.

Show us the math!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
IMU wrote:
No matter if you look at his success over his career, or break down his individual game logs...he dominates.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: He "dominates" so much he loses most of the time. What are the pitchers he faces doing? SUPER-DOMINATING?

Jose Quintana has never faced another pitcher, besides the few plate appearances in interleague.


Of course he has. If you really think game context has no bearing I'm not sure what you're rooting for. You can't move runs from one game to another.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22577
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Except there are 12 qualified MLB starters right now that average 6 RS/9 or better, and 30 that average 5 or better. The White Sox as a team average below 4, and average just more than 3 runs per 9 when Quintana is on the hill.

The White Sox offense is in the bottom half of the MLB in AVG, bottom-3rd in OBP, and bottom-quartile in SLG. It is the offense that sucks when Quintana is pitching, not the opposing pitcher being really good. If it were indeed that Quintana is just "bested" by better pitchers every time out, we would expect to see the Sox as an above-average team shut down by a great starter. They are not, they are a well-below-average offensive team.


Again, we go with a 20 game sample when it suits our argument.


Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:17 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
The whole argument here is that the Sox, who are a bad offense, are even worse with Quintana pitching for some strange reason. The likely answer is that the other pitcher is outperforming him by shutting down the offense more than expected.


And that game conditions, particularly plate umpire and hitter's background, have a huge effect on how many runs are scored. Quintana usually takes the worst of it. He's an okay pitcher, far from "dominant", and far from being a top ten pitcher in the majors.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:28 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
JORR has been awfully quiet about No Decision Quintana. He's still not winning any games.


What's there to say about him? He's just a middle of the road pitcher. The guy on the other team usually pitches as well or better than he does. This is baseball, not steroid ball. If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree. The game are likely to be close and low-scoring. Good pitchers come out on the winning end more often than not. Then there are mediocre guys like Horlen and Quintana.


What are you talking about? He's given up 1 run or less in 4 of his 5 starts since the All Star break. Most pitchers win over 75% of those starts. How many did Quintana win? He won only 1. He's given up 6 runs in 5 starts since the break and still isn't winning. He's won 1 game all year when he's given up more than 1 run.


In 11 of his 22 starts he's given up 1 run or less. In 15 of his 22 starts he's given up 2 runs or less. Not sure what more you can ask for.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.


For his career he's in the bottom 5 in run support and has been in the bottom 10 every season of his career.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:34 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
JORR has been awfully quiet about No Decision Quintana. He's still not winning any games.


What's there to say about him? He's just a middle of the road pitcher. The guy on the other team usually pitches as well or better than he does. This is baseball, not steroid ball. If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree. The game are likely to be close and low-scoring. Good pitchers come out on the winning end more often than not. Then there are mediocre guys like Horlen and Quintana.


What are you talking about? He's given up 1 run or less in 4 of his 5 starts since the All Star break. Most pitchers win over 75% of those starts. How many did Quintana win? He won only 1. He's given up 6 runs in 5 starts since the break and still isn't winning. He's won 1 game all year when he's given up more than 1 run.


In 11 of his 22 starts he's given up 1 run or less. In 15 of his 22 starts he's given up 2 runs or less. Not sure what more you can ask for.


What have the guys he faced done? Are they as great as he is?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.


For his career he's in the bottom 5 in run support and has been in the bottom 10 every season of his career.


I don't recognize "run support". Are you saying that the pitchers in the same games he has been in allowed less runs than he did?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.


For his career he's in the bottom 5 in run support and has been in the bottom 10 every season of his career.


I don't recognize "run support". Are you saying that the pitchers in the same games he has been in allowed less runs than he did?


are they facing the same offenses ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:44 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
JORR has been awfully quiet about No Decision Quintana. He's still not winning any games.


What's there to say about him? He's just a middle of the road pitcher. The guy on the other team usually pitches as well or better than he does. This is baseball, not steroid ball. If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree. The game are likely to be close and low-scoring. Good pitchers come out on the winning end more often than not. Then there are mediocre guys like Horlen and Quintana.


What are you talking about? He's given up 1 run or less in 4 of his 5 starts since the All Star break. Most pitchers win over 75% of those starts. How many did Quintana win? He won only 1. He's given up 6 runs in 5 starts since the break and still isn't winning. He's won 1 game all year when he's given up more than 1 run.


In 11 of his 22 starts he's given up 1 run or less. In 15 of his 22 starts he's given up 2 runs or less. Not sure what more you can ask for.


What have the guys he faced done? Are they as great as he is?


When a guy gives up 16 total runs in those 15 starts I think it's absolutely ridiculous to tell him to pitch better.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Are Felix Doubront and Kyle Gibson better pitchers than Jose Quintana?

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 3:29 pm
Posts: 34795
pizza_Place: Al's Pizza
Isn't it time to let Nate Jones close out games?

_________________
Good people drink good beer - Hunter S. Thompson

<º)))><

Waiting for the time when I can finally say
That this has all been wonderful, but now I'm on my way


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
IMU wrote:
Are Felix Doubront and Kyle Gibson better pitchers than Jose Quintana?



Doubront is a reliever who has pitched over 100 innings maybe once or twice. I barely know who Gibson is but I'm gonna say he has a losing record. You can do better if you want to go this route.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.


For his career he's in the bottom 5 in run support and has been in the bottom 10 every season of his career.


I don't recognize "run support". Are you saying that the pitchers in the same games he has been in allowed less runs than he did?


are they facing the same offenses ?


The guys Quintana is facing are holding the Sox further below their run-scoring average than Quintana is holding the other team below theirs. That should end that line of argument in Quintana's favor.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Chus wrote:
Isn't it time to let Nate Jones close out games?


Yes.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[

The guys Quintana is facing are holding the Sox further below their run-scoring average than Quintana is holding the other team below theirs. That should end that line of argument in Quintana's favor.


show me that stats in percentage terms.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22577
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Except there are 12 qualified MLB starters right now that average 6 RS/9 or better, and 30 that average 5 or better. The White Sox as a team average below 4, and average just more than 3 runs per 9 when Quintana is on the hill.

The White Sox offense is in the bottom half of the MLB in AVG, bottom-3rd in OBP, and bottom-quartile in SLG. It is the offense that sucks when Quintana is pitching, not the opposing pitcher being really good. If it were indeed that Quintana is just "bested" by better pitchers every time out, we would expect to see the Sox as an above-average team shut down by a great starter. They are not, they are a well-below-average offensive team.
What are the numbers?

In games that Quintana pitches, how much does he lower their runs scored from their average and how much does the opposing pitcher lower the runs scored of the White Sox?

The whole argument here is that the Sox, who are a bad offense, are even worse with Quintana pitching for some strange reason. The likely answer is that the other pitcher is outperforming him by shutting down the offense more than expected.

Show us the math!


Image

"QOPP R/9" is "Quintana Opponents' Runs per 9 Innings", and "ROPP R/G" is "Real Opponents Runs per Game". The bottom in bold is an average of all teams (not including the inter-league split at the top), and as you can see, Quintana is able to limit opponent scoring to about 65% of their averages when extrapolated out to 9 innings. Without extrapolation, Quintana holds opponents to an average that is 47% of their regular marks.

The White Sox average 3.39 R/9 when Quintana is on the hill, and their average is 3.99 R/G. So, all told, the opposing pitchers are limiting White Sox output to 85% of their average.

The problem is that the Sox' offense is so bad, that even limiting it's run-scoring rate by 85% makes leaving the game after 5, 6, or 7 innings and change with a lead an even more daunting task if you give up even a single run. And that is why "Wins" is such an awful metric.


Last edited by Juice's Lecture Notes on Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:02 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Hatchetman wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
[

The guys Quintana is facing are holding the Sox further below their run-scoring average than Quintana is holding the other team below theirs. That should end that line of argument in Quintana's favor.


show me that stats in percentage terms.


I'm not sure what you mean by "percentage terms", but IMU gave you the numbers above as if they supported his argument rather than mine.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Except there are 12 qualified MLB starters right now that average 6 RS/9 or better, and 30 that average 5 or better. The White Sox as a team average below 4, and average just more than 3 runs per 9 when Quintana is on the hill.

The White Sox offense is in the bottom half of the MLB in AVG, bottom-3rd in OBP, and bottom-quartile in SLG. It is the offense that sucks when Quintana is pitching, not the opposing pitcher being really good. If it were indeed that Quintana is just "bested" by better pitchers every time out, we would expect to see the Sox as an above-average team shut down by a great starter. They are not, they are a well-below-average offensive team.
What are the numbers?

In games that Quintana pitches, how much does he lower their runs scored from their average and how much does the opposing pitcher lower the runs scored of the White Sox?

The whole argument here is that the Sox, who are a bad offense, are even worse with Quintana pitching for some strange reason. The likely answer is that the other pitcher is outperforming him by shutting down the offense more than expected.

Show us the math!


Image

"QOPP R/9" is "Quintana Opponents' Runs per 9 Innings", and "ROPP R/G" is "Real Opponents Runs per Game". The bottom in bold is an average of all teams (not including the inter-league split at the top), and as you can see, Quintana is able to limit opponent scoring to about 65% of their averages when extrapolated out to 9 innings. Without extrapolation, Quintana holds opponents to an average that is 47% of their regular marks.

The White Sox average 3.39 R/9 when Quintana is on the hill, and their average is 3.99 R/G. So, all told, the opposing pitchers are limiting White Sox output to 85% of their average.


Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If you expect your team to provide six runs of "support" every game, you're barking up the wrong tree.


Except there are 12 qualified MLB starters right now that average 6 RS/9 or better, and 30 that average 5 or better. The White Sox as a team average below 4, and average just more than 3 runs per 9 when Quintana is on the hill.

The White Sox offense is in the bottom half of the MLB in AVG, bottom-3rd in OBP, and bottom-quartile in SLG. It is the offense that sucks when Quintana is pitching, not the opposing pitcher being really good. If it were indeed that Quintana is just "bested" by better pitchers every time out, we would expect to see the Sox as an above-average team shut down by a great starter. They are not, they are a well-below-average offensive team.
What are the numbers?

In games that Quintana pitches, how much does he lower their runs scored from their average and how much does the opposing pitcher lower the runs scored of the White Sox?

The whole argument here is that the Sox, who are a bad offense, are even worse with Quintana pitching for some strange reason. The likely answer is that the other pitcher is outperforming him by shutting down the offense more than expected.

Show us the math!


Image

"QOPP R/9" is "Quintana Opponents' Runs per 9 Innings", and "ROPP R/G" is "Real Opponents Runs per Game". The bottom in bold is an average of all teams (not including the inter-league split at the top), and as you can see, Quintana is able to limit opponent scoring to about 65% of their averages when extrapolated out to 9 innings. Without extrapolation, Quintana holds opponents to an average that is 47% of their regular marks.

The White Sox average 3.39 R/9 when Quintana is on the hill, and their average is 3.99 R/G. So, all told, the opposing pitchers are limiting White Sox output to 85% of their average.


If your argument is so fucking strong, why are you always disingenuously hiding the ball with short samples?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
JLN just answered it.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:07 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Good to see you recognize that in yourself.


I've never used a short sample. I've stated time and time again like a broken record that baseball is a game of time and repetition. After 140 big league starts, Quintana has been found wanting.


For his career he's in the bottom 5 in run support and has been in the bottom 10 every season of his career.


I don't recognize "run support". Are you saying that the pitchers in the same games he has been in allowed less runs than he did?


are they facing the same offenses ?


The guys Quintana is facing are holding the Sox further below their run-scoring average than Quintana is holding the other team below theirs. That should end that line of argument in Quintana's favor.


So in the 15 games that Quintana gave up a total of 16 runs (1 or less in 11 games 2 or less in 4) you believe that he should pitch better?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:09 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:

So in the 15 games that Quintana gave up a total of 16 runs (1 or less in 11 games 2 or less in 4) you believe that he should pitch better?


No, I believe Ian Kennedy and Ricky Nolasco should pitch worse.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22577
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
If your argument is so fucking strong, why are you always disingenuously hiding the ball with short samples?


Because I have to create these databases manually? I'd happily compile a database from which I can make all kinds of arguments, and if I had a sports talk show in a two-team baseball town, I just might. But I don't, so I won't, and I'll continue to take the easier route in compiling databases, which means smaller samples.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

So in the 15 games that Quintana gave up a total of 16 runs (1 or less in 11 games 2 or less in 4) you believe that he should pitch better?


No, I believe Ian Kennedy and Ricky Nolasco should pitch worse.


So he should pitch better? Maybe give up 0 runs in all of them? Your argument is ridiculous.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:18 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79590
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

So in the 15 games that Quintana gave up a total of 16 runs (1 or less in 11 games 2 or less in 4) you believe that he should pitch better?


No, I believe Ian Kennedy and Ricky Nolasco should pitch worse.


So he should pitch better? Maybe give up 0 runs in all of them? Your argument is ridiculous.


I consider any argument that suggests that a guy who pitches worse than the opposition in the majority of his games is great to be ridiculous.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23861
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
All I know if I was in a World Series game 7 there's no one I'd rather have on the mound for my team than the guy Quintana is pitching against.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:22 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Nas wrote:

So in the 15 games that Quintana gave up a total of 16 runs (1 or less in 11 games 2 or less in 4) you believe that he should pitch better?


No, I believe Ian Kennedy and Ricky Nolasco should pitch worse.


So he should pitch better? Maybe give up 0 runs in all of them? Your argument is ridiculous.


I consider any argument that suggests that a guy who pitches worse than the opposition in the majority of his games is great to be ridiculous.


He's in the Cy Young discussion but you would tell me that he's having a mediocre season.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sox game thread
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38700
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I remember when we used to have this argument about Jeff Samardzija and how all those advanced stats told me how great he was but for run support and here is finally pitching for a good team and he all he can muster is 8-7 with a mid 4 ERA.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3602 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 ... 121  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group