Ed_from_Lisle wrote:
Do they have enough time to get the Rollins statue up before he leaves town?
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Rollins DFA https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=100845 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Rollins DFA |
Bye. |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
i know nothing about tim anderson, yet because of the past 10 years of zero white sox position players actually succeeding once called up, i've already written him off |
|
| Author: | Ed_from_Lisle [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
Do they have enough time to get the Rollins statue up before he leaves town? |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
Ed_from_Lisle wrote: Do they have enough time to get the Rollins statue up before he leaves town?
|
|
| Author: | Chet Coppock's Fur Coat [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
I watch a lot of Dodgers baseball late night with the MLB package. Vin Scully couldn't find anything even moderately interesting to say about Jimmy Rollins by August last year, much less something complementary of his play. Yet Kenny and Rick thought he could do something in Chicago with less of a lineup around him?? This should be Exhibit A for firing both of them. The money they save by keeping Anderson down there long enough to not be a Super Two is offset by what they wasted on Rollins. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
This was the first clearly correct move of the week. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
Now they can bring back Drake. |
|
| Author: | formerlyknownas [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
After the opening series, it was downhill for Rollins. |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
This was a good decision, but it's going to take a lot more than Anderson and Justin Morneau to fix that lineup. Just look at the lineup as a whole. It's really underwhelming. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
Racists for getting rid of BLACK man. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
spmack wrote: Racists for getting rid of BLACK man. Tim Anderson is black |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
NOT BLACK ENOUGH. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
Bagels wrote: spmack wrote: Racists for getting rid of BLACK man. Tim Anderson is black He'll be gone soon. 
|
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rollins DFA |
the 1 or 2M they spent on rollins got them out of the 13M owed to laroche, so it was a win all things considered |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|