Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Carson Fulmer
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=108093
Page 1 of 8

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Carson Fulmer

Starting game 2, today. Waves and waves of talent.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

:lol:

Wait what? Isn't he getting rocked in the minors?

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Who?

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

Wait what? Isn't he getting rocked in the minors?


Yup. The guy drafted BEFORE Ian Happ.

Author:  good dolphin [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Shows how deep the Sox system is when a #1 pick fails with it having no impact on the system.

Great job Hahn

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

Wait what? Isn't he getting rocked in the minors?


Yup. The guy drafted BEFORE Ian Happ.

Be careful with the Happ Hype. Before the season started you also thought Schwarber was good.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

Wait what? Isn't he getting rocked in the minors?


Yup. The guy drafted BEFORE Ian Happ.

Be careful with the Happ Hype. Before the season started you also thought Schwarber was good.


No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
:lol:

Wait what? Isn't he getting rocked in the minors?


Yup. The guy drafted BEFORE Ian Happ.

Be careful with the Happ Hype. Before the season started you also thought Schwarber was good.


No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.

No, you thought he was good. There's more than just that one thread with Rick to point to. No big deal, just saying things change fast for these young guys

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

You predicted John Lackey was dead in April.

Author:  Brick [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Kyle still has a puncher's chance at 30 home runs. But let's not derail this thread..its not about the Cubs, it's about how shitty Carson Fulmer is!

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 1:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Caller Bob wrote:
You predicted John Lackey was dead in April.

He must've taken something around the AS break to "help" him finish out the season. That's understandable.

Still, he was the third starter to open the season and after 23 starts he has a .1 fwar, 4.67 ERA, and 5.50 Fip. I don't think I was too far off.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

FavreFan wrote:
Still, he was the third starter to open the season


This means nothing. He was their "4th" best starter on opening day. Do you think he was ranked higher,in anyone's mind, than the 2016 ERA champ?

Author:  conns7901 [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

So is Fulmer pitching a sign of tanking or a sign of trying to win games?

Author:  Brick [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Caller Bob wrote:
Kyle still has a puncher's chance at 30 home runs. But let's not derail this thread..its not about the Cubs, it's about how shitty Carson Fulmer is!
34. Say it with me. 34.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

conns7901 wrote:
So is Fulmer pitching a sign of tanking or a sign of trying to win games?


They're developing young talent!

Author:  Brick [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.
So 34 home runs this year?

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Kyle still has a puncher's chance at 30 home runs. But let's not derail this thread..its not about the Cubs, it's about how shitty Carson Fulmer is!
34. Say it with me. 34.


10 to go, say it with me, 10 to go. (I'm counting his Iowa homeruns too)

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.
So 34 home runs this year?


I don't even know what that means. You already lost this argument badly. You should probably just stop.

Author:  IMU [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

I'm really sorry that the White Sox rebuild isn't working out. It's too bad.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Lots of Cubs fans caring about a Sox game today.

Author:  IMU [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Lots of Cubs fans caring about a Sox game today.

Remember, Cubs fans are superior baseball fans. We pay attention to the entire league, not just one team.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.
So 34 home runs this year?


I don't even know what that means. You already lost this argument badly. You should probably just stop.

You can't be serious. Your boy Bob is using minor league stats to try to justify his prediction to Rick.

Author:  Brick [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.
So 34 home runs this year?


I don't even know what that means. You already lost this argument badly. You should probably just stop.
No, you see, this is what makes it so great. We don't have to argue. The number was set before the season. It was 34 home runs and I was wrong. I didn't even set the number. Caller Bob did. I am 100% certain you posted multiple times in the thread too.

I knew that you guys would declare victory no matter how horrible his season went(and getting sent down to the minors would certainly qualify) so instead I made it a very simple number that I didn't even set.

I understand you guys wanting to ignore that though.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

What Bob said has no bearing on Rick's bad argument.

Author:  Brick [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

leashyourkids wrote:
What Bob said has no bearing on Rick's bad argument.
Where were you with this prior to the season when it was clearly defined?

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
No, I only maintained that he hasn't lost any of his power stroke, which he hasn't.
:lol:


He absolutely hasn't.
So 34 home runs this year?


I don't even know what that means. You already lost this argument badly. You should probably just stop.
No, you see, this is what makes it so great. We don't have to argue. The number was set before the season. It was 34 home runs and I was wrong. I didn't even set the number. Caller Bob did. I am 100% certain you posted multiple times in the thread too.

I knew that you guys would declare victory no matter how horrible his season went(and getting sent down to the minors would certainly qualify) so instead I made it a very simple number that I didn't even set.

I understand you guys wanting to ignore that though.


We stipulated 34 home runs in 2017. It was never stipulated they all had to be at one level. Trying to change the rules when it's looking bad for you. #Sad.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

leashyourkids wrote:
What Bob said has no bearing on Rick's bad argument.

Of course it does. It's the sole reason they've been going back and forth all year on the Schwarber power thing

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 21, 2017 2:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Carson Fulmer

IMU wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Lots of Cubs fans caring about a Sox game today.

Remember, Cubs fans are superior baseball fans. We pay attention to the entire league, not just one team.

Wrong.

Page 1 of 8 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/