Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

2005 ALCS
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=108945
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:43 am ]
Post subject:  2005 ALCS

Today's starting pitchers are being asked to go maybe 5 innings in the playoffs. Matchups out of the bullpen are already being played out in the 5th and 6th inning sometimes. We have seen starters come trotting out of the pen in non-elimination games.

Meanwhile, Ozzie Guillen just sat back and let his horses run the race. Now, its a bit easier to pitch when Paul Konerko hits a HR before the starter even throws a pitch, but nevertheless there were still 27 outs to cover and the starters indeed covered them all. Four times in a row. That feat is legendary. I do not believe those games get the historical due and praise that they deserve. Clearly it is something we will never see again in our lifetimes.


It was a joy to watch Hendricks, Scherzer, and Strasburg (twice) mow guys down with seemingly very little effort. Strasburg's change up was pretty much an un-hittable pitch yesterday. Manager's don't matter until they do. Stop dicking around and if a guy gets on base, let your starter figure out a way to get out of the inning.

2005.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Another series where the Sox we're trailing.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

11-1. Even the best postseason team ever had a small speedbump.

Author:  2005 [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Go Crazy!

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Frank Coztansa wrote:
11-1. Even the best postseason team ever had a small speedbump.

Cant wait for Joe Morgan to respond to this.


1976 Cincinnati Reds

NLCS: 3-0 over Philadelphia Phillies

World Series: 4-0 over New York Yankees

Author:  conns7901 [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

1999 Yankees 11-1

1976 Red 7-0


Sox lose the Angels series if their is instant replay.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

1999 Yankees and 2005 White Sox neck and neck for best complete seasons ever.

Sox get the edge for winning 99 games to 98 for the Yankees.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Terry's Peeps wrote:
1999 Yankees and 2005 White Sox neck and neck for best complete seasons ever.

Sox get the edge for winning 99 games to 98 for the Yankees.

Not even the best White Sox team. 1917 was better.


76 Reds won 103 and went 7-0 in post season


1939 Yankees might be the best ever though.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 8:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

conns7901 wrote:
Sox lose the Angels series if their is instant replay.
No. Buehrle comes out and pitches the 10th, and Iguchi hits a walk-off homer.

Cry more.



This is not the place to debate the best playoff team of the modern era. Besides, at worst, the White Sox are 1B to the Yankees 1A.

This is a thread to marvel at a feat of starting pitching that we will never see again.

Author:  tommy [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 10:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Sox lose the Angels series if their is instant replay.
No. Buehrle comes out and pitches the 10th, and Iguchi hits a walk-off homer.

Cry more.



This is not the place to debate the best playoff team of the modern era. Besides, at worst, the White Sox are 1B to the Yankees 1A.

This is a thread to marvel at a feat of starting pitching that we will never see again.

I loved the network's movie trailer for The Rotation

Author:  MartyD47 [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

The 2005 White Sox played Major League Baseball closer to perfection for an entire season than any team has this century.

Author:  Panther pislA [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Today's starting pitchers are being asked to go maybe 5 innings in the playoffs. Matchups out of the bullpen are already being played out in the 5th and 6th inning sometimes. We have seen starters come trotting out of the pen in non-elimination games.

Meanwhile, Ozzie Guillen just sat back and let his horses run the race. Now, its a bit easier to pitch when Paul Konerko hits a HR before the starter even throws a pitch, but nevertheless there were still 27 outs to cover and the starters indeed covered them all. Four times in a row. That feat is legendary. I do not believe those games get the historical due and praise that they deserve. Clearly it is something we will never see again in our lifetimes.


It was a joy to watch Hendricks, Scherzer, and Strasburg (twice) mow guys down with seemingly very little effort. Strasburg's change up was pretty much an un-hittable pitch yesterday. Manager's don't matter until they do. Stop dicking around and if a guy gets on base, let your starter figure out a way to get out of the inning.

2005.

Not to mention Contreras went 8.1 innings in Game 1.

Author:  America [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 12:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Cotts pitched .2 innings and that was it for the bullpen all series. It is definitely legendary.

But I think it can be done again. Whenever the medical science catches up to what is injuring players the pendulum will swing back to starters. Maybe 10 years, maybe 50...but eventually they'll crack the done on pitcher longevity.

Author:  tommy [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

MartyD47 wrote:
The 2005 White Sox played Major League Baseball closer to perfection for an entire season than any team has this century.

Favorite defensive play (besides the ninth inning of Game Four of the Word Series): Tad throwing to third.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

So Sox fans are trying their hardest to out-Uncle Rico Bears fans?

Sad

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 9:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Rewatch starts Saturday?

Author:  jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

I agree with Frank's opening statement. It was an amazing accomplishment all that time ago.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Cubs may need this strategy. Bullpen is trash.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

jimmypasta wrote:
I agree with Frank's opening statement. It was an amazing accomplishment all that time ago.


That was what, 4 deaths ago?

Time flies.

Author:  Brick [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 10:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

jimmypasta wrote:
I agree with Frank's opening statement. It was an amazing accomplishment all that time ago.
You still celebrate the old Cubs who never did anything?

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
1999 Yankees and 2005 White Sox neck and neck for best complete seasons ever.

Sox get the edge for winning 99 games to 98 for the Yankees.

Not even the best White Sox team. 1917 was better.


76 Reds won 103 and went 7-0 in post season


1939 Yankees might be the best ever though.


1927 Yankees

In the 1927 World Series, the New York Yankees swept the Pittsburgh Pirates in four games. This was the first sweep of a National League team by an American League team.

That year, the Yankees led the American League in runs scored, hits, triples, home runs, base on balls, batting average, slugging average and on-base percentage. It featured legends Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig at their peaks. The team won a then-league record 110 games, finished with a 19-game lead over second place, and are considered by many to be the greatest team in the history of baseball.

The 1927 Pittsburgh Pirates, with MVP Paul Waner, led the National League in runs, hits, batting average and on-base percentage.

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 2:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Big Chicagoan wrote:
How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?


Why you gotta be mean?

Author:  tommy [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

FrankDrebin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
1999 Yankees and 2005 White Sox neck and neck for best complete seasons ever.

Sox get the edge for winning 99 games to 98 for the Yankees.

Not even the best White Sox team. 1917 was better.


76 Reds won 103 and went 7-0 in post season


1939 Yankees might be the best ever though.


1927 Yankees

In the 1927 World Series, the New York Yankees swept the Pittsburgh Pirates in four games. This was the first sweep of a National League team by an American League team.

That year, the Yankees led the American League in runs scored, hits, triples, home runs, base on balls, batting average, slugging average and on-base percentage. It featured legends Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig at their peaks. The team won a then-league record 110 games, finished with a 19-game lead over second place, and are considered by many to be the greatest team in the history of baseball.

The 1927 Pittsburgh Pirates, with MVP Paul Waner, led the National League in runs, hits, batting average and on-base percentage.

'83 Sox woulda swept them

Author:  leashyourkids [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Frank Coztansa wrote:
This is not the place to debate the best playoff team of the modern era.


The next sentence...

Flapjacks wrote:
At worst, the White Sox are 1B to the Yankees 1A.


Derp!

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Big Chicagoan wrote:
How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?
They didn't lose a game.

Author:  City of Fools [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

Big Chicagoan wrote:
How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?

ignoring the snark, this is a legit question. Did the amount of work on the arms in 2005 affect 2006? Bullpens are good and useful.

Author:  tommy [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

City of Fools wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?

ignoring the snark, this is a legit question. Did the amount of work on the arms in 2005 affect 2006? Bullpens are good and useful.


The bullpen is what killed them. Cotts sucked and Politte and Hermanson's careers were over. That and no Rowand and too much Vazquez.

Author:  FrankDrebin [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

tommy wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
1999 Yankees and 2005 White Sox neck and neck for best complete seasons ever.

Sox get the edge for winning 99 games to 98 for the Yankees.

Not even the best White Sox team. 1917 was better.


76 Reds won 103 and went 7-0 in post season


1939 Yankees might be the best ever though.


1927 Yankees

In the 1927 World Series, the New York Yankees swept the Pittsburgh Pirates in four games. This was the first sweep of a National League team by an American League team.

That year, the Yankees led the American League in runs scored, hits, triples, home runs, base on balls, batting average, slugging average and on-base percentage. It featured legends Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig at their peaks. The team won a then-league record 110 games, finished with a 19-game lead over second place, and are considered by many to be the greatest team in the history of baseball.

The 1927 Pittsburgh Pirates, with MVP Paul Waner, led the National League in runs, hits, batting average and on-base percentage.

'83 Sox woulda swept them


Couldn't even get Tito Landrum out

Author:  City of Fools [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 3:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: 2005 ALCS

tommy wrote:
City of Fools wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
How'd the Sox do in the 2006 ALCS?

ignoring the snark, this is a legit question. Did the amount of work on the arms in 2005 affect 2006? Bullpens are good and useful.


The bullpen is what killed them. Cotts sucked and Politte and Hermanson's careers were over. That and no Rowand and too much Vazquez.

but how did the starters do over the next season?

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/