Quote:
“I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.”
.
.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=116188 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Uh oh... https://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/white ... tstop-mine |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
What do you want him to say? Ken Patterson refused to give up # 34 for Bo Jackson. Bo fêted him, and rightly so. |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
“I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.” God damn right it is. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Quote: “I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.” .
|
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
tommy wrote: What do you want him to say? Ken Patterson refused to give up # 34 for Bo Jackson. Bo fêted him, and rightly so. All Bo had to do was give ol KP a case of Grey Goose and he would have stitched it on his jersey himself. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
tommy wrote: What do you want him to say? How about pretty anything other than SS is mine? Exactly what he should think...no problem with him having that attitude, but probably best for him to keep that to himself. It would be hilarious tho if the Sox lose out on him because of them not wanting him to play SS. That would really help boost the Frank/Keyser rivalry 
|
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Either one of them can play average SS, maybe. |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
RFDC wrote: tommy wrote: What do you want him to say? How about pretty anything other than SS is mine? Exactly what he should think...no problem with him having that attitude, but probably best for him to keep that to himself. Nah, he's gotta say that publicly for his pride and so Machado doesn't think he's a little bitch, even if we both know that Machado will play where he wants. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
I like it, he's a better SS than Manny and he knows it, everybody knows it. Machado needs to play 3rd base no matter who he signs with. Jeter wouldn't let Aroid play SS and Aroid was a better SS than Jeter. It's no good for the team to have divas. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
312player wrote: I like it, he's a better SS than Manny and he knows it, everybody knows it. Machado needs to play 3rd base no matter who he signs with. Jeter wouldn't let Aroid play SS and Aroid was a better SS than Jeter. It's no good for the team to have divas. yes because Jeter to the Yankees is just like Anderson to the Sox
|
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
My point was that Jeter n Aroid co existed and won a ring even though Aroid was the better SS. Nobody thinks Machado is a better glove than TA. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Keyser Soze wrote: “I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.” Tim Anderson was given the starting SS position. He's never had any competition. If the Sox sign Machado and he wants to play shortstop, sorry "Timmay", but your ass is playing a different position.
God damn right it is. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: “I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.” Tim Anderson was given the starting SS position. He's never had any competition. If the Sox sign Machado and he wants to play shortstop, sorry "Timmay", but your ass is playing a different position.God damn right it is. Exactly. There is no other option. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
RFDC wrote: 312player wrote: I like it, he's a better SS than Manny and he knows it, everybody knows it. Machado needs to play 3rd base no matter who he signs with. Jeter wouldn't let Aroid play SS and Aroid was a better SS than Jeter. It's no good for the team to have divas. yes because Jeter to the Yankees is just like Anderson to the Sox Fucking 312
|
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Keyser Soze wrote: “I don’t feel like I have to bow down to nobody. I don’t feel like I just have to give something up what I worked hard for. I would love to play with him, but shortstop is mine.” Tim Anderson was given the starting SS position. He's never had any competition. If the Sox sign Machado and he wants to play shortstop, sorry "Timmay", but your ass is playing a different position.God damn right it is. Stated perfectly. Tim Anderson has done nothing but earn himself the right to watch some Tom Emanski videos. He's a bench player on a WS team. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
I don't know if I would go that far. He certainly has some offensive skills. His defense, while improved, is definitely not worthy of a premium position on a Championship team. My overall point isn't that Anderson has earned nothing, its that he has not earned the right to be the starting SS over somebody of Manny Machado's ilk. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Anderson has an above average glove at short, you guys are nuts. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
312player wrote: My point was that Jeter n Aroid co existed and won a ring even though Aroid was the better SS. Nobody thinks Machado is a better glove than TA. ARod wasn't the better shortstop. That's why he didn't play there. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
He absolutely was |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Defensively ranked 10th on Fangraphs. Offensively, he had 149 strikeouts, .240 Batting average, and a .281 OBP. I'm sorry....he's not a starting SS on championship team. He's not a starting anything on a championship team. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
I like Anderson not rolling over for Machado and having a little attitude about it . Good on him . |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. I wonder if conditioning and projections of THEIR BODIES came into it. A Rod got fat by A Rod standards, Jeter seemed to maintain his girlish figure |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. You're the first person I ever seen with this BS, I'm gonna chalk it up to you not watching much Mlb outside the Sox. Jeter was one of the worst SS in mlb for over a decade, you've been duped and bought into the hype. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. I wonder if conditioning and projections of THEIR BODIES came into it. A Rod got fat by A Rod standards, Jeter seemed to maintain his girlish figure The organization thought it would be disrespectful to move him off Short. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
312player wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. I wonder if conditioning and projections of THEIR BODIES came into it. A Rod got fat by A Rod standards, Jeter seemed to maintain his girlish figure The organization thought it would be disrespectful to move him off Short. That's not the entire reasoning and JORR's thing about ARod tipping pitches is legit. https://www.si.com/mlb/2009/04/30/roberts-qa |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
rogers park bryan wrote: 312player wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. I wonder if conditioning and projections of THEIR BODIES came into it. A Rod got fat by A Rod standards, Jeter seemed to maintain his girlish figure The organization thought it would be disrespectful to move him off Short. That's not the entire reasoning and JORR's thing about ARod tipping pitches is legit. https://www.si.com/mlb/2009/04/30/roberts-qa Wow...if true, what a--I don't even know what to call him. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Timmy has no other position but SS. Not with a .280 OBP. He will get traded. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
rogers park bryan wrote: 312player wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: 312player wrote: He absolutely was I disagree. What you're saying is like saying Jay Cutler is a better quarterback than Tom Brady based on his size, mobiliy, and arm strength. ARod was sloppy in Seattle and Texas often tipping off hitters with his positioning. There's a reason the Yankees kept Jeter in the middle of the field and it ain't because the other guy was better. I wonder if conditioning and projections of THEIR BODIES came into it. A Rod got fat by A Rod standards, Jeter seemed to maintain his girlish figure The organization thought it would be disrespectful to move him off Short. That's not the entire reasoning and JORR's thing about ARod tipping pitches is legit. https://www.si.com/mlb/2009/04/30/roberts-qa Nothing surprises me about Aroid, he's been a disgrace to the game for a long time.. that doesn't change the fact he had a better arm than Jeter and much better range. |
|
| Author: | The Hawk [ Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Tim Anderson wants no part of Machado |
Caller Bob wrote: I guess then that my idea of him moving to center field is out of the question, eh? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|