Elmhurst Steve wrote:
But like Might, he may gain weight and keep on raking. Though he is not ever going to be Might in his prime.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=116459 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Elmhurst Steve [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
At least the Southside fans have not been given false hope, that might have led to them wasting money on tickets. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
maybe you should lose your keyboard |
|
| Author: | vitoscotti [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Crying about losing the guy who doesn't hustle in the world series? In a couple years he will be an overweight fat lazy slob. |
|
| Author: | Elmhurst Steve [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
vitoscotti wrote: Crying about losing the guy who doesn't hustle in the world series? In a couple years he will be an overweight fat lazy slob. That is possible. But like Miggy, he may gain weight and keep on raking. Though he is not ever going to be Miggy in his prime. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Elmhurst Steve wrote: But like Might, he may gain weight and keep on raking. Though he is not ever going to be Might in his prime.
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
By 2023 you'll be happy to not have Machado. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 2:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
rogers park bryan wrote: By 2023 you'll be happy to not have Machado. I say 2026 |
|
| Author: | Dignified Rube [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Who would pay $300 million for a baseball player? That's just stupid, if the Sox were anywhere near that offer. |
|
| Author: | Polecat666 [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Its not even the money, its the years. 10 years is just stupid. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Dignified Rube wrote: Who would pay $300 million for a baseball player? That's just stupid, if the Sox were anywhere near that offer. Bingo. |
|
| Author: | tommy [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
It's a blessing in disguise. Spend money to build a damn team--don't just play the fucking Lotto. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
It would be cool to see what some of these teams value these guys at with their REALLY.BIG.COMPUTERS. It's hard to imagine that any of them are worth these mega contracts. There are no more Barry-Bonds-on-juice in the league anymore. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
leashyourkids wrote: It would be cool to see what some of these teams value these guys at with their REALLY.BIG.COMPUTERS. It's hard to imagine that any of them are worth these mega contracts. There are no more Barry-Bonds-on-juice in the league anymore. But sometimes a contract can look bad in the later years even though it was worth it overall see Jon Lester |
|
| Author: | juschill [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
The White Sox are the Pittsburgh Pirates. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
tommy wrote: It's a blessing in disguise. Spend money to build a damn team--don't just play the fucking Lotto. Machado wasn't just a the lotto. He was a very logical piece of the bigger rebuild. He was that one star to go along with all the younger players. |
|
| Author: | vitoscotti [ Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Machado career stats. ba 282, obp 335, ops 822. Waddle & Boyle were saying cinch Hof. Really? Solid talent. Lazy fucker. No Mike Trout. |
|
| Author: | The Hawk [ Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
vitoscotti wrote: Crying about losing the guy who doesn't hustle in the world series? In a couple years he will be an overweight fat lazy slob. I agree totally. In addition to being one of dirtiest players in baseball. The guy is a legit star but a bad guy. I don't regret them not signing him to a very young team. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
juschill wrote: The White Sox are the Pittsburgh Pirates. Pretty much. What is leftover from Cubs is in fact a small market. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Maybe losing out on Machado and Harper is good. |
Elmhurst Steve wrote: At least the Southside fans have not been given false hope, that might have led to them wasting money on tickets. Kill yourself. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|