Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Diddling in Birmingham
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=126040
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sat Aug 07, 2021 11:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Diddling in Birmingham

Pretty bad if true.

https://www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/form ... nt-in-2019

Author:  vitoscotti [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 1:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

As of a couple years ago he was on the fast track in the Sox organization. Even a candidate for manager.

The Score data geeks were pushing for his hall of fame consideration based on his defensive data, despite his offensive mediocrity.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 6:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.

Author:  Cashman [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.


IDK, kinda explains why Vizquel left the organization all of a sudden.

Author:  Seacrest [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 8:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.



Did you read the article Peeps posted?

Because if you did, that's an incredibly odd take to walk away with from it.

Author:  Ogie Oglethorpe [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 8:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Didn't Bernstein think he should've been a manager candidate? :lol:

Author:  Nardi [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 9:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Didn't Bernstein think he should've been a manager candidate? :lol:

After 6 months, people wanted him in the major league dugout. They said the Sox would "lose him" if they didn't.

It's in black and white right here on this board.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 9:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.



Did you read the article Peeps posted?

Because if you did, that's an incredibly odd take to walk away with from it.


It’s seems like Vizquel is a bully, and the Sox parted ways with him after they found out.

Author:  vitoscotti [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 10:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Bernstein & Julie wanted him to manage the Sox because he's a poc. If he snuck through the system and was the current Sox manager it would be a colossal mess.

Author:  sjboyd0137 [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 11:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

vitoscotti wrote:
Bernstein & Julie wanted him to manage the Sox because he's a poc. If he snuck through the system and was the current Sox manager it would be a colossal mess.

Bingo

Author:  Seacrest [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 12:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.



Did you read the article Peeps posted?

Because if you did, that's an incredibly odd take to walk away with from it.


It’s seems like Vizquel is a bully, and the Sox parted ways with him after they found out.


Is that really your take from the article?

Author:  thomas [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 1:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Nardi wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
Didn't Bernstein think he should've been a manager candidate? :lol:

After 6 months, people wanted him in the major league dugout. They said the Sox would "lose him" if they didn't.

It's in black and white right here on this board.

Well, I wanted Wally Backman at one point, too, before hearing about his personal life. Same with Vizquel.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.



Did you read the article Peeps posted?

Because if you did, that's an incredibly odd take to walk away with from it.


It’s seems like Vizquel is a bully, and the Sox parted ways with him after they found out.


Is that really your take from the article?


It’s a lawsuit summary not a balanced article. A lawsuit meant to separate Vizquel from his money. Maybe Vizquel was married for years and had kids as a cover. Or maybe saying sexual harassment is a better path to riches. I don’t know what happened.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

I mean who hasn't exposed themselves to an autistic bat boy?

Author:  Seacrest [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.



Did you read the article Peeps posted?

Because if you did, that's an incredibly odd take to walk away with from it.


It’s seems like Vizquel is a bully, and the Sox parted ways with him after they found out.


Is that really your take from the article?


It’s a lawsuit summary not a balanced article. A lawsuit meant to separate Vizquel from his money. Maybe Vizquel was married for years and had kids as a cover. Or maybe saying sexual harassment is a better path to riches. I don’t know what happened.


You aren't this understanding with young black males. And you do know that the Sox/Barons suspended and eventually fired him shortly thereafter.

One of these tasks included stocking the refrigerator with Vizquel's favorite beer. The lawsuit claimed on at least five occasions, a partially undressed Vizquel approached the batboy from behind while he was stocking the refrigerator and tried to have "normal" conversations with him. During these conversations, Vizquel would allegedly expose his partial or fully erect penis to the batboy “showing that his purpose in exposing himself was to obtain sexual gratification.”

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Vizquel appears to be a scumbag at best and a rapist at worse.

Author:  Rod [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 4:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Cashman wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.


IDK, kinda explains why Vizquel left the organization all of a sudden.



I think that happened because he beat his wife.

Author:  Seacrest [ Sun Aug 08, 2021 5:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Diddling in Birmingham

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Cashman wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
So the batboy saw Omar Vizquel naked, and had to wash his back once. It's just strange behavior. I'm not sure how the White Sox should be liable.


IDK, kinda explains why Vizquel left the organization all of a sudden.



I think that happened because he beat his wife.



No.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/319 ... harassment

In a statement, the White Sox said: "After first learning of an alleged incident in late August 2019, the Chicago White Sox conducted an internal investigation that resulted in the termination of the organization's relationship with Omar Vizquel.

The issue with his wife came up in 2020.

He asked a Tigers bat boy to wash his back five years or so earlier. Not normal behavior by any standard.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/