| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Hagen Smith https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=132305 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Cashman [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 6:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Hagen Smith |
Drafted 5th overall. Seems to be a 20yr old lefty pitcher. I do not know any more. I am trying to look up how fast he throws. |
|
| Author: | Cashman [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
93-97, can hit 100mph. 6-3 225lbs. |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 6:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
He was really good this season, until their NCAA game vs Kansas St where he sucked. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 6:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
He should fetch a decent haul when he is traded in 2030 |
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 7:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Cashman wrote: Drafted 5th overall. Seems to be a 20yr old lefty pitcher. I do not know any more. I am trying to look up how fast he throws. His 17.3 strikeouts per nine innings made him one of the most feared pitchers in college baseball, and he struck out nearly five batters for every one he walked in his third collegiate season. |
|
| Author: | Warren Newson [ Sun Jul 14, 2024 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
I was happy they didn't take Caglianone, but I would have liked to see them take Wetherholt. |
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 8:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Warren Newson wrote: I was happy they didn't take Caglianone, but I would have liked to see them take Wetherholt. How come? The ESPN guys were drooling over him last night. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Woo Pig!!! |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
they didn't have the #1 pick ? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Bagels wrote: they didn't have the #1 pick ? No, that will be the next draft. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Brick wrote: Bagels wrote: they didn't have the #1 pick ? No, that will be the next draft. I heard since they were able to get to 70 losses before the all star break that they get the 1st and 2nd pick next year. |
|
| Author: | Warren Newson [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Tall Midget wrote: Warren Newson wrote: I was happy they didn't take Caglianone, but I would have liked to see them take Wetherholt. How come? The ESPN guys were drooling over him last night. I don't think he's going to pitch and he has low positional value in that he doesn't play up the middle. That will be all well and good if he hits 30 homeruns a year, but we've heard that thing before and it hasn't come to fruition. I don't want another Andrew Vaughn/Eloy Jimenez. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 10:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? What about Randy Moss? |
|
| Author: | Tall Midget [ Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Warren Newson wrote: Tall Midget wrote: Warren Newson wrote: I was happy they didn't take Caglianone, but I would have liked to see them take Wetherholt. How come? The ESPN guys were drooling over him last night. I don't think he's going to pitch and he has low positional value in that he doesn't play up the middle. That will be all well and good if he hits 30 homeruns a year, but we've heard that thing before and it hasn't come to fruition. I don't want another Andrew Vaughn/Eloy Jimenez. That all makes sense. He really looks like he's going to be a heck of a hitter, though. But I suppose that's true of a lot of failed prospects, as you pointed out. |
|
| Author: | BD [ Tue Jul 16, 2024 9:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Caller Bob wrote: He should fetch a decent haul when he is traded in 2030 As long as the current ownership won't pay pitching talent, he won't play more than 5-6 seasons with the White Sox if he establishes himself as a front-line starter. With Crochet likely being traded for 2, maybe 3, young players who will be highly regarded, this cycle won't stop until/unless the White Sox decide to act like a big market team. Probably not realistic to expect if they keep current ownership. |
|
| Author: | juschill [ Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Brick wrote: Bagels wrote: they didn't have the #1 pick ? No, that will be the next draft. They will pick no higher than 10th next draft. |
|
| Author: | juschill [ Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? Anti tanking rules prohibit large market teams from picking in the top ten in consecutive years regardless of final record. Sox can’t even get historically awful right. |
|
| Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Jul 20, 2024 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
juschill wrote: Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? Anti tanking rules prohibit large market teams from picking in the top ten in consecutive years regardless of final record. Sox can’t even get historically awful right. Wait…what? How will this impact the Sox draft pick next year? |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Sat Jul 20, 2024 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
This Ends in Antioch wrote: juschill wrote: Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? Anti tanking rules prohibit large market teams from picking in the top ten in consecutive years regardless of final record. Sox can’t even get historically awful right. Wait…what? How will this impact the Sox draft pick next year? Next year? Looks like they'll get the #1. |
|
| Author: | juschill [ Sun Jul 21, 2024 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
Nardi wrote: This Ends in Antioch wrote: juschill wrote: Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? Anti tanking rules prohibit large market teams from picking in the top ten in consecutive years regardless of final record. Sox can’t even get historically awful right. Wait…what? How will this impact the Sox draft pick next year? Next year? Looks like they'll get the #1. Not under the new rules. Not in the top ten. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Sun Jul 21, 2024 9:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Hagen Smith |
juschill wrote: Brick wrote: Caller Bob wrote: In the plan for "Project 2025" the Sox SHOULD get the first pick in the 2026 daft. Why not the 2025 draft? Anti tanking rules prohibit large market teams from picking in the top ten in consecutive years regardless of final record. Sox can’t even get historically awful right. I won't believe this until Caller Bob confirms it. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|