Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
The Long Ball https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=23928 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
I dont know if they were in the top 3, but the 1977 Dodgers had four guys with 30 or more homers (Cey, Garvey, Baker and Monday). I am pretty sure George Foster led that year or maybe Kingman, I think thats as close as it gets though. Plus 77 was the south side hitman, so Zisk and Gamble had to be in the leaders also. |
Author: | Beardown [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Good question. I know the '61 yankees had the 1 and 2 guys. Marris and Mantle. Canseco and Mcguire might have been 1&2. I don't know if anybody has finished 1,2,3. Maybe those bashers from the Rockies in the late 1990s. |
Author: | WestmontMike [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
The '27 Yankees did. If anyone else did, I have no idea. |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
1982 is the closet I can find. 1-Reggie Jackson 39 California Angels 1-Gorman Thomas 39 Milwaukee Brewers 2-Dave Winfield 37 New York Yankees 3-Ben Oglivie 34 Milwaukee Brewers 4-Cecil Cooper 32 Milwaukee Brewers |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Quote: The '27 Yankees did. If anyone else did, I have no idea. Ruth had 60 Gehrig had 48 Then Lazzeri had 18.......I think Ruth and Gehrig might have been the class of the league. |
Author: | Irish Boy [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
1995 came close in the NL: Bichette-COL 40 Sosa-CHC 36 Walker-COL 36 Bonds-SFG 33 Castilla-COL 32 You were right about the Rockies for that year. |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Quote: 1995 came close in the NL: Bichette-COL 40 Sosa-CHC 36 Walker-COL 36 Bonds-SFG 33 Castilla-COL 32 |
Author: | Beardown [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Steroids + Thin Air They didn't put the balls in a humidifier back then either. |
Author: | Mr. Reason [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Bichette was never on 'roids. Neither was anyone else on that list. |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Quote: Bichette was never on 'roids. Neither was anyone else on that list. |
Author: | Beardown [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
Maybe your right. At least not in 1995. 40 led the league that year. That's not crazy. |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
I am pretty sure about sosa and bonds, Bichette admitted to using them a few years back. Walker and Castilla, I think so. |
Author: | Beardown [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
But I don't think Sosa started that year. 1998 started the 60+ homer years for him. Maybe those other guys didn't start until later. Who knows? It wasn't insane numbers in 1995. Bonds started in 1999. He got jelous over what Sosa and Mcguire were doing. |
Author: | RodeoVann [ Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
I wasnt pinpointing just that year. |
Author: | Irish Boy [ Tue Aug 26, 2008 9:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: The Long Ball |
40 HRs leading the league in Colorado isn't an insane number, and no one else cracked that. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |