It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 1:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Thome option
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:25 pm
Posts: 3021
Jim Thome's 9th inning strikeout on Saturday night allowed his 2009 option to kick in, as it was his 564th plate appearance. Thome needed to reach 1100 plate appearances between 2007 and 2008 for the option to be a factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thome option
PostPosted: Sun Sep 21, 2008 11:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
RodeoVann wrote:
Jim Thome's 9th inning strikeout on Saturday night allowed his 2009 option to kick in, as it was his 564th plate appearance. Thome needed to reach 1100 plate appearances between 2007 and 2008 for the option to be a factor.

Is it a team option? Or is it a player option, where Thome can elect to have that year picked up? If it is a team option, I would think he may very well not be retained.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thome option
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 10:17 am
Posts: 14391
Location: West Burbs
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
RodeoVann wrote:
Jim Thome's 9th inning strikeout on Saturday night allowed his 2009 option to kick in, as it was his 564th plate appearance. Thome needed to reach 1100 plate appearances between 2007 and 2008 for the option to be a factor.

Is it a team option? Or is it a player option, where Thome can elect to have that year picked up? If it is a team option, I would think he may very well not be retained.


His option for 2009 was guaranteed with the 1100 pa's as Rodeo mentioned. It's for 13M. If he was under the 1100 PA's, it would have been a team option for 2009 with a 3M buyout.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thome option
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:06 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
DDD wrote:
Now Stone will have to report this as the White Sox having the accurate payroll. Or will he.



The Phillies are responsible for about half the $ he was owed on that deal. We've been thru this before. Its something like $21 mil of that deal that the Phillies are paying/have paid.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thome option
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 8:43 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
I don't think the Phillies are responsible for next year's salary though (I could be wrong). I'm sure the White Sox would like to have Thome back for cheaper, but there's not much they could have done here as they are in a playoff race.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Thome option
PostPosted: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 2974
Location: who wants to know?
I'm pretty sure the Sox got Thome plus $22mil in the trade. The '09 option is now no longer and option. The $3mil buyout is gone and if the Sox want to keep him they'll have to pay the $13mil. It looks like the Sox will have to pay to get rid of him OR if they're lucky he'll renegotiate a new deal. I like Jim Thome (especially because he's a lefty) but it might be time to move on...this team has about 4 guys that could fill the DH role.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group