| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Buehrle was right https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=35797 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Buehrle was right |
Kenny What the fuck does Peavy do for you in August? Jose and Torres in the rotation isn't going to cut it. Don't mention Sweaty Freddie. Wasn't it fuckin Coop who liked Jose and Bartolo's side sessions in the spring??? Now he likes Garcia give me a break and get a stop gap quick for you guys piss this away! 
|
|
| Author: | Hawkeye Vince [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Who are you going to get right now? Smoltz? Keep him....Garland? Bad.... |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Hawkeye Vince wrote: Who are you going to get right now? Smoltz? Keep him....Garland? Bad.... You could have got Pavano.....but no the Twins got him.Or Vincente Padilla Ozzie is looking for somebody to plunk someone here he is 
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
He got the best available pitcher. Obviously the asking price for Halladay was way too high, and you only get him for a season and a half. The Indians were not going to trade Cliff Lee within the division. I suppose, asswipe, you would have rathered Pavano or Washburn because they are able to pitch now 
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: You could have got Pavano.....but no the Twins got him. The Twins can have him. Peavy > Pavano |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: He got the best available pitcher. Obviously the asking price for Halladay was way too high, and you only get him for a season and a half. The Indians were not going to trade Cliff Lee within the division. I suppose, asswipe, you would have rathered Pavano or Washburn because they are able to pitch now If you think the Sox are just short one starter you are dumber than I imagined! |
|
| Author: | BD [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Hawkeye Vince wrote: Who are you going to get right now? Smoltz? Keep him....Garland? Bad.... You could have got Pavano.....but no the Twins got him.Or Vincente Padilla Ozzie is looking for somebody to plunk someone here he is You want Padilla???? |
|
| Author: | BD [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He got the best available pitcher. Obviously the asking price for Halladay was way too high, and you only get him for a season and a half. The Indians were not going to trade Cliff Lee within the division. I suppose, asswipe, you would have rathered Pavano or Washburn because they are able to pitch now If you think the Sox are just short one starter you are dumber than I imagined! Come September, the Sox will be short just one starter. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: If you think the Sox are just short one starter you are dumber than I imagined! If you think that Pavano, Smoltz, and/or Padilla make this team better, you are dumber than I imagined. Which is pretty tough to do because we pretty much figure you to be a complete moron. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: If you think the Sox are just short one starter you are dumber than I imagined! If you think that Pavano, Smoltz, and/or Padilla make this team better, you are dumber than I imagined. Which is pretty tough to do because we pretty much figure you to be a complete moron. If you think a rotation of Danks, Flyod, and Buehrle will carry this team until Peavy pitches you are nuts. So you'll just leave the staff the way it is then....right? |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buerlhe was right |
I guess Buehrle is an asswipe too! Some of us are confused figuring out what [Williams] is doing if [Peavy] is going to be another month away. I don't know what's helping us for this next month." |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
No, you're still the asswipe. As others have mentioned, what will help them now is giving teams 27 outs and not 29 or 30 like they have been. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Well you and others give me the details of how you make the Sox better defensively? With who also!
|
|
| Author: | BD [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: If you think the Sox are just short one starter you are dumber than I imagined! If you think that Pavano, Smoltz, and/or Padilla make this team better, you are dumber than I imagined. Which is pretty tough to do because we pretty much figure you to be a complete moron. If you think a rotation of Danks, Flyod, and Buehrle will carry this team until Peavy pitches you are nuts. So you'll just leave the staff the way it is then....right? Yes. Considering it's August 10th, and Peavy is due back August 28th (or so), there is not one move the Sox can make without shocking the baseball world with a waiver wire move, that will dramatically alter the current rotation. The #5 spot, when used, hasn't been good, and that probably won't change. Contreras hasn't been good either, and that probably won't change much either. Bringing in Padilla, calling Garcia up probably won't magically fix the rotation. To suggest otherwise is not correct. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Take your chances with Torres. He was not good on Saturday, but he had a decent MLB debut. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Take your chances with Torres. He was not good on Saturday, but he had a decent MLB debut. How does this prevent you from giving the opponent 29-30 outs? Oh thats right you can't make an error when you walk fucking everyone 
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
You really want to bring a guy in who couldn't pitch for Texas?
|
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
RFDC wrote: You really want to bring a guy in who couldn't pitch for Texas? Is he better than Torres and Granpa Jose? Answer the question jagoff1 |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
No. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: No. Jose 4-11 with a 5.09 era Torres 0-0 with a 6.75 era (27 year old rookie) Padilla 8-6 with a 4.92 era You are Dumb Fuck Frank and always will be.How you and others making the defense better? |
|
| Author: | BD [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Take your chances with Torres. He was not good on Saturday, but he had a decent MLB debut. How does this prevent you from giving the opponent 29-30 outs? Oh thats right you can't make an error when you walk fucking everyone What would signing Padilla change for the #5 spot in the White Sox rotation? Is it because you've heard of him and that somehow makes him better than he really is? |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
He is better than what they have.And he isn't afraid to hit somebody. What is all the love for Contreras and Torres? |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
So to clarify: You firmly believe that any one of these 3 pitchers-- Padilla, Washburn, Pavano-- make the White Sox better than them having Jake Peavy. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: So to clarify: You firmly believe that any one of these 3 pitchers-- Padilla, Washburn, Pavano-- make the White Sox better than them having Jake Peavy. No you pea brain! They are better than Contreras or Torres ...who the Sox are trotting out there now. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
So Kenny should NOT have traded for a proven, solid ace? |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: So Kenny should NOT have traded for a proven, solid ace? No |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Thank you for finally admitting that you're an idiot. |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Thank you for finally admitting that you're an idiot. I meant they need more than Peavy which is definetly showing now! |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Aug 10, 2009 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: So Kenny should NOT have traded for a proven, solid ace? No Is the way this question phrased fucked up? |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Aug 27, 2009 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Buehrle was right |
RFDC wrote: You really want to bring a guy in who couldn't pitch for Texas? Yes |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|