| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Big Hurt in the Booth https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=46185 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat May 15, 2010 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Big Hurt in the Booth |
Please do not ever do television broadcast again. He is brutal. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sat May 15, 2010 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
He's not that bad to me. Considering that he's never really done it..... |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat May 15, 2010 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
"No doubt about it." |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat May 15, 2010 9:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
"Not at all" |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Sat May 15, 2010 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
spmack wrote: He's not that bad to me. Considering that he's never really done it..... Agreed. It isn't like he has been in the both for 10 years and is still "iffy" to "terrible". I would love some real analysis of the hitting and more interaction with Hawk...but I guess it's hard to ruin a broadcast because you're not saying too much dumb and awkward stuff. He keeps it short. I'm fine with that. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Sat May 15, 2010 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
Would you rather have Bill Melton in the booth with Ken Harrelson instead? |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat May 15, 2010 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
SHARK wrote: Would you rather have Bill Melton in the booth with Ken Harrelson instead? "No doubt about it" |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sat May 15, 2010 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
Anyone in that booth is better than hawk. I am not a sox fan by any means, but the radio broadcast is tolerable and the opposing team telecast is tolerable. It's hawk that is intolerable unless you are a huge sox fan. |
|
| Author: | Aggravated Sox Fan Bob [ Sun May 16, 2010 7:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
I thought the combination was a breath of fresh air....Harrelson acted like a human being...It was two guys sitting up there talking about a game and NOT ACTING LIKE THE DUMB ASS GAME WITH TWO CRAP TEAMS WAS LIFE AND DEATH!!!! I DON'T NEED TO HEAR THE BREAKDOWN OF THE SWINGS OF THE KANSAS CITY ROYALS. It was a welcome change.....the game was in PERSPECTIVE......it was actually fun to listen to. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Mon May 17, 2010 2:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
Frank Thomas may have been a really good player, but isn't much of an analyst. Tom Paciorek would've been better... |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Mon May 17, 2010 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: Anyone in that booth is better than hawk. You want to borrow Mike Shannon for a few games? |
|
| Author: | FYI [ Mon May 17, 2010 6:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Big Hurt in the Booth |
Why can't they find a guy like Brenly? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|