Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
DANKS = BAD https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=59181 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon May 30, 2011 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | DANKS = BAD |
No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd. 5+ ERA Not many K's 1.51 WHIP Batters hitting almost .300 off of him. ZERO WINS. Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy. I will see you in hell, Danks Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better! |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon May 30, 2011 3:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
SomeGuy wrote: No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd. 5+ ERA Not many K's 1.51 WHIP Batters hitting almost .300 off of him. ZERO WINS. Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy. I will see you in hell, Danks Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better! Shit man...what about quality starts he has like 7 or 8, that with Dunns OPSBOPRAGGMOPP this team will be in 1st place by All Star break |
Author: | bigfan [ Mon May 30, 2011 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
SomeGuy wrote: No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd. 5+ ERA Not many K's 1.51 WHIP Batters hitting almost .300 off of him. ZERO WINS. Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy. I will see you in hell, Danks Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better! Please call Ranger |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon May 30, 2011 3:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: SomeGuy wrote: No wins and, in my opinion, sucking huge cock this year so far. I really don't give a shit about fuck heads and numbers and shit, this guy is sub-par and on par with a giant turd. 5+ ERA Not many K's 1.51 WHIP Batters hitting almost .300 off of him. ZERO WINS. Floyd is the better of the two and it may be wishful thinking but Danks goes to the bullpen when/if the 6 man rotation gets axed. Fuck this guy. I will see you in hell, Danks Hey John! Stop cocking your hat to the side, stop sucking at baseball and start pitching better! Shit man...what about quality starts he has like 7 or 8, that with Dunns OPSBOPRAGGMOPP this team will be in 1st place by All Star break Yes! Don't worry about the stats above! He is pitching just fine! wins, whip, Ba against, ERA, K's....all kiddie stats with little meaning! You gotta go to fan graphs and Baseball Prospectus to find the latest obscure stat like VORGONFUCKYOURSELF, which will show you he is just fine! |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue May 31, 2011 9:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
I thought W-L record had no meaning. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 31, 2011 9:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
They don't. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue May 31, 2011 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
How much money has he cost himself this year? |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Not sure. Initial reaction would be to say a lot. But then I think of the money the Ross Ohlendorf got. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Not sure. Initial reaction would be to say a lot. But then I think of the money the Ross Ohlendorf got. Yeah probably not a ton. His agent can spin it as an abberation. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
I think thats true. The new world of MLB stats and effects on contracts. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Arbitration is based more on service time over results. There was a case where an arbitrator had to have 'RBI' explained to him. So no, advanced stats aren't a factor either. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Keyser Soze wrote: Arbitration is based more on service time over results. There was a case where an arbitrator had to have 'RBI' explained to him. So no, advanced stats aren't a factor either. What about Russ Ohlendorf? |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Tue May 31, 2011 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Service time comparables. That's when all this came out because the stats geeks started saying that the arbitrators must have looked at sabermetrics. They didn't. |
Author: | HossasSlavicRage [ Tue May 31, 2011 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Title should read "Danks = Bad lately". He has been pretty damn good the last three years. I hope that this poor play convinces him to sign a long term contract with the White Sox. Also, the eternal question: Who would you replace him with? |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue May 31, 2011 3:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
No. He's your mess and I'll be damned if I'm gonna clean him up. |
Author: | Douchebag [ Tue May 31, 2011 3:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
I finally dumped John Danks from my fantasy team. I predict he throws a perfect game in his next start. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue May 31, 2011 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Douchebag wrote: I finally dumped John Danks from my fantasy team. I predict he throws a perfect game in his next start. I'm on the brink of letting him go.......I just can't do it. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue May 31, 2011 6:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
HossasSlavicRage wrote: Title should read "Danks = Bad lately". He has been pretty damn good the last three years. I hope that this poor play convinces him to sign a long term contract with the White Sox. Also, the eternal question: Who would you replace him with? He's been good. He's really inefficient which results in higher pitch counts than you would think he would have. It's not that he walks guys but it sure seems like he goes from 1-2 to 3-2 much too often. It seems like he wants to be paid like a great pitcher but despite what many others think, I think a great pitcher needs to be someone who goes out there and wins games. I'll grant that he is still maturing and these are results of immaturity. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
The White Sox have pushed John Danks' next start back to next Monday against Seattle and moved Jake Peavy up a day to start Sunday's game against the Tigers. Edwin Jackson also said he would accept a move to the bullpen. Hopefully the 6-man rotation is finally coming to an end. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Hawk was talking about the 6-man rotation and said Peavy likes it because of the extra day of rest. I wonder if they're thinking about making him a sunday starter. They obviously aren't afraid of thinking out of the box. Making him a sunday starter will give him his rest between starts and the other guys can pitch a little more frequently and not have so many days off between starts. |
Author: | Rod [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
The reason teams were able to use sunday starters was because of the doubleheaders. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: DANKS = BAD |
Keyser Soze wrote: The White Sox have pushed John Danks' next start back to next Monday against Seattle and moved Jake Peavy up a day to start Sunday's game against the Tigers. Edwin Jackson also said he would accept a move to the bullpen. Hopefully the 6-man rotation is finally coming to an end. I'm shocked Boras hasn't sewed his mouth shut over this. Jackson is in a contract year and if he shows anthing as a starter he will get some big money. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |