Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Hey Ranger https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=69132 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | good dolphin [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Hey Ranger |
I'll take that action. Way to think big with $500. |
Author: | Keyser Soze [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
A little more information please. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
caller said dunn was going to hit .160 again ranger said no. "i bet he does" "find someone to wager with - how bout $500?" ranger doesn't want to be the counter party. wonder why? |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Apr 13, 2012 10:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Caller said he was looking forward to the Three Stooges movie. Ranger said no person with a functioning brain would see that movie and you couldn't pay him to see it. Caller offered $500. Ranger is still mulling the offer. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Hatchetman wrote: caller said dunn was going to hit .160 again ranger said no. "i bet he does" "find someone to wager with - how bout $500?" ranger doesn't want to be the counter party. wonder why? Ranger told the caller there was no way he knows for certain dunn will be bad, which I guess is true. Ranger said he wouldn't because he looked better even though he was continuing to strike out. Odd reasoning and he big balled the guy with the $500 bet that Ranger wouldn't take. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
good dolphin wrote: Hatchetman wrote: caller said dunn was going to hit .160 again ranger said no. "i bet he does" "find someone to wager with - how bout $500?" ranger doesn't want to be the counter party. wonder why? Ranger told the caller there was no way he knows for certain dunn will be bad, which I guess is true. Ranger said he wouldn't because he looked better even though he was continuing to strike out. Odd reasoning and he big balled the guy with the $500 bet that Ranger wouldn't take. The Ranger will fight to the death for his White Sox! |
Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Apr 16, 2012 9:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
He does. I understand it and I kind of respect it. His position that this 4 KO game looked better than last year's 4 KO game is not one I would want to defend. |
Author: | bigfan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
4 KO game looked better than last years 4 KO game???? Almost as good as hearing "southside bob" call in and state that the ump missed 3 pitches in the 10th and thats why Coop got run and that why the 2 HR were given up. White Sox excuses machine is in mid season mode! |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
So are your posting habits. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
I didnt see it, but Hawk had to be going nuts on that non strike call in the 9th |
Author: | Rod [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
rogers park bryan wrote: I didnt see it, but Hawk had to be going nuts on that non strike call in the 9th No. He mentioned it, but he wasn't repeatedly whining and blaming the loss on it. In fact, he said that the Sox had received "gift runs". It was absolutely a strike though, not like some borderline pitch that could have gone either way. The ump blew it. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: I didnt see it, but Hawk had to be going nuts on that non strike call in the 9th No. He mentioned it, but he wasn't repeatedly whining and blaming the loss on it. Why not? |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Because outside of that pitch, Barksdale actually had a really really good game behind the plate. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
BTW, Ranger is the poster boy for Curious Hair's brilliant post about the smart sports fan at the Score Paraphrasing.... I wish they'd stop trying to take the smart fan's tact. Because they arent thinking half as well as they think they are Honestly, the Poor Ranger and his crazy Sox fans calls things is so dumb. Ranger has as many dumb thoughts as anyone who calls that show. Still waiting for him to admit that Chris Young might be better than Alex Rios. According to Ranger, Chris Young is bad at baseball, and Rios is an all star |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
rogers park bryan wrote: According to Ranger, Chris Young is bad at baseball, and Rios is an all star I don't listen to much of the Sox pre and postgame, but has he really said this?
|
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Frank Coztansa wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: According to Ranger, Chris Young is bad at baseball, and Rios is an all star I don't listen to much of the Sox pre and postgame, but has he really said this?2 years ago |
Author: | bigfan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Rios was a Bonafide ALL Star per Stone. This guy was going to be really good, what he did at Tor before they traded for him was a fluke. Frank getting mad! Baseball. Sox Baseball. Angry, Tough, Grindy, knowledgable, stay at home, use state money, Robins quite leadership.... |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Who is mad now? Why don't you just keep "quite" there, bagman. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
bigfan wrote: Rios was a Bonafide ALL Star per Stone. This guy was going to be really good, what he did at Tor before they traded for him was a fluke. I never understood how people viewed Rios. In Toronto he had 1 great year and like 4 average to bad ones. For some reason people thought the 1 year was the real Rios. Doesnt really make sense. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
rogers park bryan wrote: In Toronto he had 1 great year and like 4 average to bad ones. For some reason people thought the 1 year was the real Rios. Doesnt really make sense. he had amazing tools and was a two-time all star at age 26. What's not to like? That's why Toronto gave him a big contract. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Frank Coztansa wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: According to Ranger, Chris Young is bad at baseball, and Rios is an all star I don't listen to much of the Sox pre and postgame, but has he really said this?I probably listen to more pre and post than the actual games. I don't know if I am typical of Sox fans but I that radio announcing team is a deterrent to me listening. Yesterday night I had a little bit of a drive home from a meeting. I was in the mood to listen to the Sox. I turned on the game for a couple of minutes and the two douchebags got bogged down in an unfunny exchange about covering first base. I actually switched to Kaplan for a couple of minutes. It just sucks listening to them. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
good dolphin wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: According to Ranger, Chris Young is bad at baseball, and Rios is an all star I don't listen to much of the Sox pre and postgame, but has he really said this?I probably listen to more pre and post than the actual games. I don't know if I am typical of Sox fans but I that radio announcing team is a deterrent to me listening. Yesterday night I had a little bit of a drive home from a meeting. I was in the mood to listen to the Sox. I turned on the game for a couple of minutes and the two douchebags got bogged down in an unfunny exchange about covering first base. I actually switched to Kaplan for a couple of minutes. It just sucks listening to them. I find them tolerable. I'm in the camp, and it may be a lonely one, that sees DJ has someone who could become good and grow into a decent radio guy....if it wasn't for the wooden, emotionless robot that sits next to him. Farmer and Rooney had the chemistry, for the most part, some of the best radio calling in the biz. It really goes to show you how switching roles and chemistry can affect those in the booth. Poor DJ. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
rogers park bryan wrote: bigfan wrote: Rios was a Bonafide ALL Star per Stone. This guy was going to be really good, what he did at Tor before they traded for him was a fluke. I never understood how people viewed Rios. In Toronto he had 1 great year and like 4 average to bad ones. For some reason people thought the 1 year was the real Rios. Doesnt really make sense. Add maybe another year and you have....Kerry Wood. And yes, I agree with your point. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
SomeGuy wrote: I find them tolerable. I'm in the camp, and it may be a lonely one, that sees DJ has someone who could become good and grow into a decent radio guy....if it wasn't for the wooden, emotionless robot that sits next to him. Farmer and Rooney had the chemistry, for the most part, some of the best radio calling in the biz. It really goes to show you how switching roles and chemistry can affect those in the booth. Poor DJ. I dunno. You mean hearing Farmer reminisce about the Phillies of waybackwhen mixing up the dugout phones on Danny Ozark WAS'NT exactly riveting radio?!? You mean you don't care about Farmer's first appearance at Yankee Stadium? You really aren't waiting for Farmer's first actually interesting story/insight in the last 5-6 years? Me neither. (But +1 on seeing DJ with possibilities....if freed from the Great 'Farmio' ) |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
The TV and radio guys are horrible and I refuse to listen to either of them. I used to be a huge Sox fan, now I don't even give a shit. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Hatchetman wrote: he had amazing tools and was a two-time all star at age 26. What's not to like? That's why Toronto gave him a big contract. Im not talking about 06, The Sox got him in 09, he had been declining 3 straight years. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Hatchetman wrote: he had amazing tools and was a two-time all star at age 26. What's not to like? That's why Toronto gave him a big contract. Im not talking about 06, The Sox got him in 09, he had been declining 3 straight years. He's done and I really don't think he gives a shit either. Kenny got caught, plain and simple. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
I don't like KW, but you can understand why someone might like Rios. He had a big year two years ago, so it's not like the talent wasn't there. He's just a head case. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Hatchetman wrote: I don't like KW, but you can understand why someone might like Rios. He had a big year two years ago, so it's not like the talent wasn't there. He's just a head case. Yeah, the contract was bad, but Im not faulting Kenny Im faulting Ranger for completely dismissing the notion that Young might be better. He was obviously wrong. But he mocked my stance. And if I had called into his show, people would "feel bad for Rongey" |
Author: | beni hanna [ Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hey Ranger |
Remember the good old days when Ranger actually jumped on and chimed in on a topic or two here at CSFMB? |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |