Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Hawk should be suspended https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=70454 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Hawk should be suspended |
I have admitted I love the guy but his reaction to the ump tossing the Sox pitcher and manager was waaayyyy overboard and very unprofessional. |
Author: | spmack [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Mini Pasta. |
Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
No He was being a commentator and giving his opinion. You should be suspended. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
sjboyd0137 wrote: No He was being a commentator and giving his opinion. You should be suspended. Not so sure about that. The comments about post season and going back to school are pretty strong. I think at some point MLB is gonna have something to say about Hawk. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
sjboyd0137 wrote: No He was being a commentator and giving his opinion. You should be suspended. You gotta be bleepin me!!!!! What are you doin Boyd!!!! What the h-hell are you doin!!!! |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Author: | FavreFan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Are you kidding me pasta? The man censored HIMSELF. That's awesome. He should be given an award by the FCC. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
denied. not a big hawk fan, but he spoke the truth. This is entertainment afterall, not SERIOUS BUSINESS. |
Author: | spanky [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
I have to admit, I thought about this on the way to work this morning (after hearing the replay for the 33rd time on both stations). He should not be suspended (either by the Sox or MLB), but I think it would be in everybody's best interest for MLB to place a call to Jerry (or Brooks or whoever oversees that part) and tell them to tell Hawk to cool it. He speaks on behalf of the team to more people than anyone else does on a regular basis - and he simply can't be screaming that Wegner is an AL umpire that knows "absolutely nothing about the game of baseball", among other things. If the Sox don;t mind the unprofessionalism, that's their choice, but to question the integrity and knowledge of the umpires in this fashion is bad for baseball. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:35 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Maybe you guys are right. Its just that anytime a player or coach even mentions umpiring he gets suspended. I know announcers have more leeway, but at some point its over the line. |
Author: | Northside_Dan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
You can't suspend him. He's clearly a DB for defending AJ spiking Ben though. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:37 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
spanky wrote: I have to admit, I thought about this on the way to work this morning (after hearing the replay for the 33rd time on both stations). He should not be suspended (either by the Sox or MLB), but I think it would be in everybody's best interest for MLB to place a call to Jerry (or Brooks or whoever oversees that part) and tell them to tell Hawk to cool it. He speaks on behalf of the team to more people than anyone else does on a regular basis - and he simply can't be screaming that Wegner is an AL umpire that knows "absolutely nothing about the game of baseball", among other things. If the Sox don;t mind the unprofessionalism, that's their choice, but to question the integrity and knowledge of the umpires in this fashion is bad for baseball. What would David Stern do if an announcer did that to one of his refs? Kill him? |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
What happened? |
Author: | spanky [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
rogers park bryan wrote: What would David Stern do if an announcer did that to one of his refs? Kill him? Probably eat him over pasta. |
Author: | Apologist [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
bigfan wrote: What happened? vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=AYOiskRTU9E |
Author: | Mr. Reason [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
jimmypasta wrote: I have admitted I love the guy but his reaction to the ump tossing the Sox pitcher and manager was waaayyyy overboard and very unprofessional. Stretch... |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
immessedup17 wrote: jimmypasta wrote: I have admitted I love the guy but his reaction to the ump tossing the Sox pitcher and manager was waaayyyy overboard and very unprofessional. I hate the guy, but agree he should be suspended. You can criticize the call...you can't go on insulting the umpire multiple times. He is a joke announcer. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
I agree with Hawk that umpires suck and I enjoy the stand he takes,but what he did yesterday was uncalled for. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
So you think he was right, but also think he should lie on the next broadcast? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Frank Coztansa wrote: So you think he was right, but also think he should lie on the next broadcast? He was way over the line. It was a bad call. They happen. What if an announcer said an umpire was on the take? How far away is Hawk from that when he insinuates certain umps have it in for the Sox? |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Thu May 31, 2012 11:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Frank Coztansa wrote: So you think he was right, but also think he should lie on the next broadcast? C'mon man,He should give his opinion without sounding like he is foaming at the mouth. If they want that kind of response,just pull one of your basic "shit for brains" White Sox fans out of the stands. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Author: | SHARK [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
The chances of Ken Harrelson getting suspended for his latest tirade at the expense of MLB umpire Mark Wegner yesterday during the WGN Sports' broadcast of the White Sox/Rays' game aren't that good. I heard Dan Bernstein mention this in the second segment of the "B & B Show", and all I heard Bernsy mention is that MLB doesn't like it when announcers rip into their umps. If Wegner gets disciplined, I don't think we'll know for sure. It's a dicey situation. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
I'm happy to be on the opposite side of pasta in hating hawk but thinking he should not be suspended |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
MLB doesn't like announcers talking bad, and we don't know if umps get punished. Yep, that's dicey alright... |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
This is the next best thing to happen to the Sox PR department next to a long winning streak. It puts the team on the front page and gets the meatball fans sufficiently interested to maybe attend a game. JR privately telling Hawk "don't stop now" |
Author: | SHARK [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Frank Coztansa wrote: MLB doesn't like announcers talking bad, and we don't know if umps get punished. Yep, that's dicey alright... Frank, if the umps gets disciplined, we will never know. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu May 31, 2012 12:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Sounds dicey! |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Thu May 31, 2012 1:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
I'm too lazy to look for sure but I heard on one of the shows that umpires are disciplined and have been suspended in the past. |
Author: | SHARK [ Thu May 31, 2012 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Hawk should be suspended |
Hank Scorpio wrote: I'm too lazy to look for sure but I heard on one of the shows that umpires are disciplined and have been suspended in the past. Hank, it's usually done behind the scenes, if you know what I mean... |
Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |