Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind dish
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=80284
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind dish

Tyler Flowers moving to a backup role. I'd have kept Gimenez around as the backup and see Flowerseses ass back to Triple "AAA" Charlotte.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd ... s&c_id=cws

Quote:
Josh Phegley was called up from Triple-A Charlotte to the White Sox prior to Friday's road series opener against the Rays, along with outfielder Blake Tekotte. Hector Gimenez was designated for assignment.

A 25-year-old catcher, Phegley is ranked as the White Sox No. 15 prospect by MLB.com. The sandwich pick and 38th overall selection in the 2009 First-Year Player Draft has been the most successful Minor Leaguer from the organization this season. Phegley did not play Thursday night for Charlotte, but carries a .316 average with 15 homers, 18 doubles and 41 RBIs into his Major League debut.

There has been plenty of outside cry for Phegley to get the promotion to help a struggling offense. The higher-ups in the organization have applauded how Tyler Flowers has handled the team's pitching staff, the top priority for any White Sox backstop, but also know that Phegley is capable of making the jump.

As a fast-rising prospect, Phegley doesn't figure to join the White Sox and play sporadically. Gordon Beckham was called up to the White Sox in 2009 and became the team's starting third baseman. Phegley's arrival could lead to Flowers moving to more of a backup role. Flowers is hitting .208 with eight homers and 22 RBIs.

Author:  RFDC [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Pretty good hitting stats. What type of defensive catcher is he?

Damn sure cannot do any worse that Flowers.

Author:  Hatchetman [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Frank Coztansa wrote:
Tyler Flowers moving to a backup role.


HOPEFULLY, but this article does not say that.

Phegley is supposed to be an average defensive catcher.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Thats for fucking sure, RFDC

Doesn't matter either way though. This season is a lost cause so let some of these so called prospects take some lumps at the big league level and see what you've got for next year.

Author:  Tall Midget [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 11:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

I'm definitely interested in seeing Phegley. Not much else to care about these days with the Sox. :(

Author:  Apologist [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

I'm looking forward to see what moniker Hawk hangs on him.

The Pheg-horn? The Terre Haute Terror ?

Author:  Tall Midget [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Pheggot?

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Tall Midget wrote:
Pheggot?


Image

Author:  Keyser Soze [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 5:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Phegaloon

Author:  SHARK [ Fri Jul 05, 2013 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Not so fast. Josh Phegley will share the catching duties with Tyler Flowers, says RV. Phegley did go 1-for-3 with 2 RBI's, but 2 K's as well in an 8-3 White Sox loss to the Rays Friday night. Makes me wonder if Flowers will get the call tomorrow night.

Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sat Jul 06, 2013 2:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Phegley up; figures to see bulk of playing time behind d

Who cares?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/