Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Chicago's Team https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=93188 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Chicago's Team |
For the second consecutive year the White Sox claim superiority in Cook Co. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
I hate those Aleutian bandwagon riders |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Can't imagine why Indiana would root for the Cubs. |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Hatchetman wrote: Can't imagine why Indiana would root for the Cubs. I've grown to appreciate Lake County IN a little more working here. Could not live, never, but its not all bad. Sucks that its governed by Indiana. |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. your data sucks |
Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. Because it's an amazing DOME ? |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Kirkwood wrote: America wrote: I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. your data sucks Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white. |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Dont worry, Fort Wayne needs a team they can relate with. Everyone has their role. |
Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: Kirkwood wrote: America wrote: I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. your data sucks Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white. True. Must be why I'm able to go to the park for $2.00 |
Author: | America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Kirkwood wrote: True. Must be why I'm able to go to the park for $2.00 That may have something to do with why the Sox are more popular. People's Choice. |
Author: | America [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
This gap will widen now that the Sox play in a functioning ballpark located in the city of Chicago. |
Author: | Juiced [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: Kirkwood wrote: America wrote: I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea. your data sucks Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white. Stats where padded by letting IL inmates vote. |
Author: | bigfan [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Sure thats not an ink stain? |
Author: | Chus [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
bigfan wrote: Sure thats not an ink stain? I think it's Pac-Man. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
It's a big thumbs up! |
Author: | America [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. |
Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Author: | bigfan [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. |
Author: | Darkside [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
bigfan wrote: America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. I'd rather have 95 wins than 95 vanity plates. that being said, Abortions For All plates outsold Sox plates. |
Author: | Scooter [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. 2005 can only be issued once I believe. |
Author: | Brick [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
bigfan wrote: America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. |
Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: bigfan wrote: America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. How about regular season attendance? 2015 :2,959,812>1,755,810 2014: 2,652,113>1,650,821 2013: 2,642,682>1,768,413 2012: 2,882,756>1,965,955 2011: 3,017,966>2,001,117 2010: 3,062,973>2,194,378 2009: 3,168,859>2,284,164 2008: 3,300,200>2,501,103 2007: 3,252,462>2,684,395 2006: 3,123,215>2,957,411 2005: 3,099,992>2,342,833 2004: 3,170,184>1,930,537 2003: 2,962,630>1,939,594 2002: 2,692,071>1,676,804 2001: 2,779,454>1,536,371 do I need to go on...... even your unbiased eyes should be able to detect a pattern. |
Author: | America [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:40 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
THE INQUISITOR wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: bigfan wrote: America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. How about regular season attendance? 2015 :2,959,812>1,755,810 2014: 2,652,113>1,650,821 2013: 2,642,682>1,768,413 2012: 2,882,756>1,965,955 2011: 3,017,966>2,001,117 2010: 3,062,973>2,194,378 2009: 3,168,859>2,284,164 2008: 3,300,200>2,501,103 2007: 3,252,462>2,684,395 2006: 3,123,215>2,957,411 2005: 3,099,992>2,342,833 2004: 3,170,184>1,930,537 2003: 2,962,630>1,939,594 2002: 2,692,071>1,676,804 2001: 2,779,454>1,536,371 do I need to go on...... even your unbiased eyes should be able to detect a pattern. FACT: Of the over 7 billion people living the world, the vast majority of them live outside the city of Chicago. |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: bigfan wrote: America wrote: Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure. The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something. The relevancy is not the issue. The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good". I have never considered a CUB license plate or a BEARS , for the simple reason, why should I spend an extra $100 on my plates? |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
bigfan wrote: The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good". This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: bigfan wrote: The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good". This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang. Plus it's inaccurate. No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z |
Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
America wrote: FACT: Of the over 7 billion people living the world, the vast majority of them live outside the city of Chicago. MORE RANDOM FACTS: World population : 7,334,771,614 Population outside Chicago 7,342,076,016 Chicago population: 2,695,598 avg number of people per household : 1.97 Now back to who is Chicago's team Hawks plates sold:18,578 Sox : 9,988 Bears: 7,014 Cubs:5,513 Bulls:2,683 Sorry America.... Chicago's team is NOT your sock it's the Hawks |
Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: bigfan wrote: The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good". This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang. Plus it's inaccurate. No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z more likely it's a 1970 Dodge Dart |
Author: | Scooter [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Chicago's Team |
THE INQUISITOR wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: bigfan wrote: The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good". This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang. Plus it's inaccurate. No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z more likely it's a 1970 Dodge Dart Fine car |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |