Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Chicago's Team
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=93188
Page 1 of 2

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Chicago's Team

For the second consecutive year the White Sox claim superiority in Cook Co.

Image

Author:  good dolphin [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

I hate those Aleutian bandwagon riders

Author:  Hatchetman [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 11:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Can't imagine why Indiana would root for the Cubs. :lol:

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Hatchetman wrote:
Can't imagine why Indiana would root for the Cubs. :lol:

I've grown to appreciate Lake County IN a little more working here. Could not live, never, but its not all bad. Sucks that its governed by Indiana.

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.


your data sucks :lol:

Author:  Curious Hair [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.

Because it's an amazing DOME ?

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.


your data sucks :lol:

Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white.

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Dont worry, Fort Wayne needs a team they can relate with. Everyone has their role.

Author:  Kirkwood [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.


your data sucks :lol:

Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white.

True. Must be why I'm able to go to the park for $2.00

Author:  America [ Wed Apr 01, 2015 12:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Kirkwood wrote:
True. Must be why I'm able to go to the park for $2.00

That may have something to do with why the Sox are more popular. People's Choice.

Author:  America [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

This gap will widen now that the Sox play in a functioning ballpark located in the city of Chicago.

Author:  Juiced [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:14 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
America wrote:
I'd like for someone to explain why moving the most popular team in the 3rd largest city in the USA into a multi-use indoor facility in Vegas is a good idea.


your data sucks :lol:

Stats dont lie bud. Chicago bleeds black and white.


Stats where padded by letting IL inmates vote.

Author:  bigfan [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Sure thats not an ink stain?

Author:  Chus [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

bigfan wrote:
Sure thats not an ink stain?


I think it's Pac-Man.

Author:  Hatchetman [ Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

It's a big thumbs up!

Author:  America [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.

Author:  THE INQUISITOR [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Image

Author:  bigfan [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.

Author:  Darkside [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

bigfan wrote:
America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.

I'd rather have 95 wins than 95 vanity plates.
that being said, Abortions For All plates outsold Sox plates.

Author:  Scooter [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 9:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.

2005 can only be issued once I believe.

Author:  Brick [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:03 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

bigfan wrote:
America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.
More relevant than spring training attendance I'd say.

Author:  THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.
More relevant than spring training attendance I'd say.


How about regular season attendance?
2015 :2,959,812>1,755,810
2014: 2,652,113>1,650,821
2013: 2,642,682>1,768,413
2012: 2,882,756>1,965,955
2011: 3,017,966>2,001,117
2010: 3,062,973>2,194,378
2009: 3,168,859>2,284,164
2008: 3,300,200>2,501,103
2007: 3,252,462>2,684,395
2006: 3,123,215>2,957,411
2005: 3,099,992>2,342,833
2004: 3,170,184>1,930,537
2003: 2,962,630>1,939,594
2002: 2,692,071>1,676,804
2001: 2,779,454>1,536,371

do I need to go on...... even your unbiased eyes should be able to detect a pattern.

Author:  America [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

THE INQUISITOR wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.
More relevant than spring training attendance I'd say.


How about regular season attendance?
2015 :2,959,812>1,755,810
2014: 2,652,113>1,650,821
2013: 2,642,682>1,768,413
2012: 2,882,756>1,965,955
2011: 3,017,966>2,001,117
2010: 3,062,973>2,194,378
2009: 3,168,859>2,284,164
2008: 3,300,200>2,501,103
2007: 3,252,462>2,684,395
2006: 3,123,215>2,957,411
2005: 3,099,992>2,342,833
2004: 3,170,184>1,930,537
2003: 2,962,630>1,939,594
2002: 2,692,071>1,676,804
2001: 2,779,454>1,536,371

do I need to go on...... even your unbiased eyes should be able to detect a pattern.

FACT:
Of the over 7 billion people living the world, the vast majority of them live outside the city of Chicago.

Author:  bigfan [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
bigfan wrote:
America wrote:
Sox once again dwarved the Cubs in vanity plates. Further proof that the Cubs are nothing more than a pretty attraction to put in the tourism brochure.


The fact you think buying more vanity plates is a good thing says something.
More relevant than spring training attendance I'd say.


The relevancy is not the issue.

The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good".

I have never considered a CUB license plate or a BEARS , for the simple reason, why should I spend an extra $100 on my plates?

Author:  Rod [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

bigfan wrote:
The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good".


This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 1:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good".


This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang.

Plus it's inaccurate.

No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z

Author:  THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

America wrote:
FACT:
Of the over 7 billion people living the world, the vast majority of them live outside the city of Chicago.


MORE RANDOM FACTS:

World population : 7,334,771,614
Population outside Chicago 7,342,076,016
Chicago population: 2,695,598
avg number of people per household : 1.97

Now back to who is Chicago's team

Hawks plates sold:18,578
Sox : 9,988
Bears: 7,014
Cubs:5,513
Bulls:2,683

Sorry America.... Chicago's team is NOT your sock it's the Hawks

Author:  THE INQUISITOR [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 10:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good".


This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang.

Plus it's inaccurate.

No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z


more likely it's a 1970 Dodge Dart

Image

Author:  Scooter [ Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Chicago's Team

THE INQUISITOR wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
bigfan wrote:
The fact White Sox fans feel the great need to display their "pride" in terms of a $200 license plate on their $40K mustang while living in their parent basement apartment, if you think thats good, we have dfferent views of "Good".


This is a good example of Apartheid Chicago. I'm getting really tired of being marginalized by Cub fans. I don't even drive a Mustang.

Plus it's inaccurate.

No way that guy has a Mustang. He most likely has an IROC-Z


more likely it's a 1970 Dodge Dart

Image

Fine car

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/