spanky wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
2005
Avg weekday: through the gate
That was pretty good.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Is it time to retire "2005"? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=97311 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Is it time to retire "2005"? |
No. 2005. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
2005. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
SomeGuy wrote: 2005. Yup.10 years and still as relevant as ever. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
2005 is valid in any argument with a Cubs fan. Wouldn't try it on stonroses though. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
City of Fools wrote: 2005 is valid in any argument with a Cubs fan. This is a good Cubs fan.
Wouldn't try it on stonroses though. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
SomeGuy wrote: 2005. Championships never lose relevancy. Beats being a year early every year. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
It has lost it's relevancy. Where are the commercial endorsements for THAT team? Even Ozzie can't get local juice. Look at the '85 Bears. There are about 25,000 Sox fans in town. Soon they will die off and the team moves to Vegas. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
jimmypasta wrote: It has lost it's relevancy. Where are the commercial endorsements for THAT team? Even Ozzie can't get local juice. Look at the '85 Bears. There are about 25,000 Sox fans in town. Soon they will die off and the team moves to Vegas. Green is a poor color on you.
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
City of Fools wrote: 2005 is valid in any argument with a Cubs fan. Wouldn't try it on stonroses though. Sox have the same number of championships as the Yankees since 2005. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
RFDC wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? Sure. Go ahead and use it |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
RFDC wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
RFDC wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? 1906 |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: RFDC wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? I am fine with that. Just seems Someguys logic is off. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
RFDC wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: RFDC wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Championships never lose relevancy. So by that logic then 1908 is just as relevant as 2005? I am fine with that. Just seems Someguys logic is off. 2005 |
|
| Author: | America [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Things invented since 2005: Being a year early, and revenue. |
|
| Author: | 2005 [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
HELL NO! |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
good dolphin wrote: Sox have the same number of championships as the Yankees since 2005. I love this little factoid |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
What about 1985? |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 7:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Colonel Angus wrote: What about 1985? YES. if there is one year that should be retired it's this 1000%
|
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: 10 years and still as relevant as ever. Hard not to argue |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: No. 2005. The past is for losers and cowards, which one are you? |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
it was one lucky season. it happens in baseball. the team sucked before that and sucked after that and still sucks |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
2005 |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Nov 18, 2015 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
Terry's Peeps wrote: 2005 Avg weekday: through the gate |
|
| Author: | newper [ Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
People still talk about 1985 with no problem. I think the issue may come up next year as the Cubs become perennial playoff contenders and the Sox finish 4th or 5th in the AL Central. I don't think anyone on either side of the fence is going to be convinced that 2005 means anything as far as it matters today. 2005 was great and I have lots of great memories of it, but it has no bearing on today. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Nov 19, 2015 7:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
spanky wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: 2005 Avg weekday: through the gate That was pretty good. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Nov 19, 2015 9:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
312player wrote: Boilermaker Rick wrote: No. 2005. The past is for losers and cowards, which one are you? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Nov 19, 2015 9:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
newper wrote: People still talk about 1985 with no problem. So we have another vote for no!I think the issue may come up next year as the Cubs become perennial playoff contenders and the Sox finish 4th or 5th in the AL Central. I don't think anyone on either side of the fence is going to be convinced that 2005 means anything as far as it matters today. 2005 was great and I have lots of great memories of it, but it has no bearing on today. But, I will agree. When the Cubs win their second World Series title in my lifetime it can be retired! |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Dec 28, 2015 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Is it time to retire "2005"? |
This is accurate for many posters on here. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|