Sox over the Cubs in 6
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Well lookey here https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=98743 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Well lookey here |
Sox over the Cubs in 6 |
|
| Author: | Ed_from_Lisle [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
There are 2 baseball teams in Chicago? |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Are these projections from the panel on the latest episode of Real Time? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Cubs won't win 100. The rest of it looks about right. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
To hear all the Sox fans on this board a complete disaster of a season is coming. No wonder no one buys tickets. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
USA today couldn't afford a sabermetrician, so they just made it up. 
|
|
| Author: | Hawkeye Vince [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Must assume a huge bounceback from Latos meaning 8-10 more wins from the back end of the rotation. |
|
| Author: | whiskey dick [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Hawkeye Vince wrote: Must assume a huge bounceback from Latos meaning 8-10 more wins from the back end of the rotation. I think we must assume that whoever is putting this shit together is smoking crack. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
How dare some members of the media think the White Sox might be decent!! Haven't they been told that this is th cubs year?! |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Frank Coztansa wrote: How dare some members of the media think the White Sox might be decent!! Haven't they been told that this is th cubs year?! I'd say 90 wins it a bit more than decent. |
|
| Author: | whiskey dick [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 5:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
The Vegas over/under is 80.5 wins. That seems reasonable. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Over. I don't think they will win 90, but 82-85 sounds about right. Just good enough to be "in it," but never really good enough to be a true contender. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Sox could be good next year. But they need a rebound year out of Melky and anything out of the DH. If Rodon keeps developing and their acquisitions over the summer play up to their career numbers, the Sox could definitely get to 90 wins. However, I don't know if they can beat out the Royals for the top spot in the Central. These projections seem to show a very difficult AL Central next year. At least one team in that division is going to end up with only 70 wins by virtue of having to play in the Central. It won't be the Royals. Could be any of the other 4. |
|
| Author: | Arlington Hts Archie [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Sox have zero depth. That's not good. |
|
| Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
lipidquadcab wrote: Are these projections from the panel on the latest episode of Real Time? the byline is Gabe Lacques Sports Assignment Editor at USA TODAY his job description: An assignment editor is a member of the newsroom staff at a newspaper, radio or television station whose job duties include deciding which reporter will cover a given story. In addition to generating story ideas and delegating coverage, assignment editors may write and edit news stories or update the news outlet's social media and website. His take on AL Central: Welcome to hell – both for prognosticators and five teams with legitimate playoff hopes. This is baseball’s deepest division, with five teams capable of winning it – and almost as many that could finish last. We feel random things happening, so hello, White Sox (90 wins). Everyone loves their Todd Frazier acquisition, and the ball should jump off his bat at U.S. Cellular Field. We prefer the possibly unparalleled 1-2 rotation punch of Chris Sale and Jose Quintana, backed by a full season of Carlos Rodon, who struck out 139 batters in 139 1/3 innings as a rookie. Our fetish for Pale Hose should not be seen as a diss toward the Royals (84 wins). It’s just really hard to repeat, particularly as a mid-market team lacking depth. We’d be thrilled if they proved us wrong. One of these years, it will all come together for the Indians (83 wins) – most likely in 2018, when an imposing crop of prospects coalesces. In 2016? It feels like they’re one bat short of greatness. The Tigers (82 wins) got that big bat in Justin Upton; it’s the questionable Nos. 3-5 starters (Anibal Sanchez, Daniel Norris, Mike Pelfrey) and thin organizational depth that’s worrisome. And our apologies to the Twins (80 wins), who wouldn’t surprise us if they produce an MVP (Miguel Sano) and Rookie of the Year (Jose Berrios). NL Central: It may become trendy to knock the Cubs (101 wins) down a peg, but there’s just too much going on here. Beyond the obvious, we see a bullpen well-equipped to deal with back-end rotation shortcomings. And when they add one more starter in July, see you later. That’s not to say the Cardinals (97 wins) should pack it in. Absurdly deep, they will platoon and pitch almost everybody into submission – and hope things go differently at Wrigley Field in October. Has the window closed for the Pirates (88 wins)? No, but this may be a “gap year” between three straight playoff clubs and a future brightened by a group of nearly-ready prospects. Top pitching prospect Tyler Glasnow could be crucial, as veteran acquisitions Ryan Vogelsong and Jonathan Niese will test the miracle-working power of pitching coach Ray Searage. The division’s big three need punching bags, and that’s where the Brewers (64 wins) and Reds (61 wins) come in. Milwaukee’s pitching is even worse upon closer inspection, and the exporting of proven big leaguers will continue as the season goes on. The Reds acquired enough useful parts and have enough proven holdovers to think a not-so-bad 75-win season could emerge. But a bullpen anchored by Jumbo Diaz will give back a lot of wins. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Arlington Hts Archie wrote: Sox have zero depth. That's not good. But no one on the Sox ever gets injured. They literally have the least time on the DL compared to any other team by far. Risky to assume that continues, but it hasn't backfired on them yet. |
|
| Author: | Keyser Soze [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Hatchetman wrote: USA today couldn't afford a sabermetrician, so they just made it up. Why spend money to get the same result. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 15, 2016 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: Sox over the Cubs in 6 Those predictions are absurd. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
whiskey dick wrote: Hawkeye Vince wrote: Must assume a huge bounceback from Latos meaning 8-10 more wins from the back end of the rotation. I think we must assume that whoever is putting this shit together is smoking crack. or they want some attention? |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 7:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Cubs fans are once again on the run over a team they claim not to care about! |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
That guy knows his AL. He is a little less knowledgeable about the NL |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Any team with two Dominant starters (Sale and what Rodon is turning into) is never really out of it. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
rogers park bryan wrote: Any team with two Dominant starters (Sale and what Rodon is turning into) is never really out of it. Add in Quintana and if this team is under 500 that would be a huge disappointment. |
|
| Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Any team with two Dominant starters (Sale and what Rodon is turning into) is never really out of it. Add in Quintana and if this team is under 500 that would be a huge disappointment. so that explains it......... 2015 Chicago White Sox 76-86 |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Cubs fans are once again on the run over a team they claim not to care about! Isn't your schtick old to even yourself at this point? |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Baseball is hard to predict. No doubt both local teams improved but with injuries,rookie surprises,etc. you just never know. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
PECOTA says 82, which makes me think USA Today might be on to something. |
|
| Author: | Arlington Hts Archie [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
i'd feel a lot more comfortable predicting sox crushing it if ventura wasn't the manager and the clubhouse wasn't full of cancers. |
|
| Author: | THE INQUISITOR [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Hatchetman wrote: PECOTA says 82, which makes me think USA Today might be on to something. Yep.... PECOTA has them only 10 games behind Cleveland and missing the WC .... seems like USA Today is correct
|
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Well lookey here |
Arlington Hts Archie wrote: i'd feel a lot more comfortable predicting sox crushing it if ventura wasn't the manager and the clubhouse wasn't full of cancers. I hear this a lot. Mostly from B&B worrying about grindy or religious guys. Maybe it is because I am out of town but I do not recall one Sox clubhouse problem the last year or two. Maybe Cooper and shark but did I miss a giant problem? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|