Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

In games that count....
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=98955
Page 1 of 2

Author:  jimmypasta [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  In games that count....

The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.

Author:  RFDC [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.

The only number that matters to Sox fans is 2005.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Sox will be better than last year.

Probably still not a playoff team.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 4:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

RFDC wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.

The only number that matters to Sox fans is 2005.


It was pretty great.

We could also use 11-1.

Ah good times...

Author:  Darkside [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

RFDC wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.

The only number that matters to Sox fans is 2005.

That was so long ago that jorr had hair then.

Author:  Brick [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.
The Sox will easily win 13 games this year.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.
The Sox will easily win 13 games this year.

By your own words, you don't care how many games they win, right?

Author:  Brick [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Mr. Reason wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.
The Sox will easily win 13 games this year.

By your own words, you don't care how many games they win, right?
Yes.

I just think they'll get at least 13 of them this year.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 7:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.
The Sox will easily win 13 games this year.

By your own words, you don't care how many games they win, right?
Yes.

I just think they'll get at least 13 of them this year.

13 games ahead of whom? Why are you wasting your precious time in this meaningless baseball endevour when you could be arguing on some other useless topic?

Maximize your free time, man.

Author:  FavreFan [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Reason, look at jimmy's original post in that quote chain. That should explain the smartass 13 game comment from Rick.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

FavreFan wrote:
Reason, look at jimmy's original post in that quote chain. That should explain the smartass 13 game comment from Rick.

Why do you care about the Cub?

Author:  FavreFan [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Mr. Reason wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Reason, look at jimmy's original post in that quote chain. That should explain the smartass 13 game comment from Rick.

Why do you care about the Cub?

I only care about bridging communication gaps, and there clearly was one here.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

FavreFan wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Reason, look at jimmy's original post in that quote chain. That should explain the smartass 13 game comment from Rick.

Why do you care about the Cub?

I only care about bridging communication gaps, and there clearly was one here.

Communication gaps? That's rich.

Is that what you youngsters now call obsession?

Author:  FavreFan [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Mr. Reason wrote:
Communication gaps? That's rich.

Is that what you youngsters now call obsession?

Who's obsessed? Do you know what forum you're currently in, old man?

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

FavreFan wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Communication gaps? That's rich.

Is that what you youngsters now call obsession?

Who's obsessed? Do you know what forum you're currently in, old man?

Forgive me, I respond to the post, not the forum.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Mr. Reason wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Communication gaps? That's rich.

Is that what you youngsters now call obsession?

Who's obsessed? Do you know what forum you're currently in, old man?

Forgive me, I respond to the post, not the forum.


Just not consistently well.

Author:  Mr. Reason [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Regular Reader wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Mr. Reason wrote:
Communication gaps? That's rich.

Is that what you youngsters now call obsession?

Who's obsessed? Do you know what forum you're currently in, old man?

Forgive me, I respond to the post, not the forum.


Just not consistently well.

You're definitely an authority on that.

Author:  Scooter [ Sun Feb 28, 2016 10:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Cubs won way more games so therefore were better than the Sox. Or do we need new math for this?

Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Terry's Peeps wrote:
Sox will be better than last year.

Probably still not a playoff team.


Too early to know, but had they signed Ian Desmond rather than Jimmy Rollins, I would like their chances better. But they have improved and if they get some better performances from players that under-performed in 2015, they should be .500 or better.

Author:  good dolphin [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 9:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.


They were 3-3 in games that count, which was not good enough to take The Cup from The Cell.

Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 7:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.


They were 3-3 in games that count, which was not good enough to take The Cup from The Cell.



OMG.....you are not serious are you? Do you really care about that cup? A playoff bid that gives the team a chance in the postseason is what matters. If the Cubs win that hunk of junk, I hope they fling it into the Chicago River. It means nothing and should be treated as such. That used to matter a bit, when the Cubs had nothing else to reasonably look forward to, while tanking during the regular season. Those days are thankfully over.

Author:  America [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Well they dont give trophies for being 3rd in your division nor getting annihilated in the NLCS, so be careful what you throw in the river. Not like the Cubs trophy case is too cluttered for the BP Cup, right?

Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

America wrote:
Well they dont give trophies for being 3rd in your division nor getting annihilated in the NLCS, so be careful what you throw in the river. Not like the Cubs trophy case is too cluttered for the BP Cup, right?


it's not to cluttered for a bag of dog crap, but I wouldn't suggest they collect that either.

Author:  Darkside [ Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Lol. Um... don't look now but Steve has been kicking a little ass in the baseball sections this week.

Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.


They were 3-3 in games that count, which was not good enough to take The Cup from The Cell.



OMG.....you are not serious are you? Do you really care about that cup? A playoff bid that gives the team a chance in the postseason is what matters. If the Cubs win that hunk of junk, I hope they fling it into the Chicago River. It means nothing and should be treated as such. That used to matter a bit, when the Cubs had nothing else to reasonably look forward to, while tanking during the regular season. Those days are thankfully over.


spoken like a guy whose team doesn't have the cup

Author:  America [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 10:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Darkside wrote:
Lol. Um... don't look now but Steve has been kicking a little ass in the baseball sections this week.

He posts the exact same thing over and over, only breaking stride to make stupid jokes about literally poop.

Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
The Cubs in 2015 won 25 more games than the White Sox. (101 Total to 76 Sox wins)

Instead of telling Cub fans about matching the 97 W total,maybe you should start hoping the Sox could win at least half that disparity for 2016.


They were 3-3 in games that count, which was not good enough to take The Cup from The Cell.



OMG.....you are not serious are you? Do you really care about that cup? A playoff bid that gives the team a chance in the postseason is what matters. If the Cubs win that hunk of junk, I hope they fling it into the Chicago River. It means nothing and should be treated as such. That used to matter a bit, when the Cubs had nothing else to reasonably look forward to, while tanking during the regular season. Those days are thankfully over.


spoken like a guy whose team doesn't have the cup


Try to think clearly.....The World Series trophy is obviously the goal. The pennant is crucial, as without it, a World Series title is not possible. A divisional championship is important so that a team can avoid the Wild Card. A spot in the playoffs even if it is through the Wild Card is great, as it still makes a Championship possible. The crosstown cup has no bearing on any of this, except for the fact that any wins in the crosstown games matter for the team's overall record. The games matter no more than any other and that cup means nothing.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 3:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Darkside wrote:
Lol. Um... don't look now but Steve has been kicking a little ass in the baseball sections this week.

:lol:

We must be reading different boards.

Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[

Try to think clearly.....The World Series trophy is obviously the goal. The pennant is crucial, as without it, a World Series title is not possible. A divisional championship is important so that a team can avoid the Wild Card. A spot in the playoffs even if it is through the Wild Card is great, as it still makes a Championship possible. The crosstown cup has no bearing on any of this, except for the fact that any wins in the crosstown games matter for the team's overall record. The games matter no more than any other and that cup means nothing.


lots of talk about The Cup for a guy who doesn't value The Cup

Author:  Elmhurst Steve [ Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: In games that count....

good dolphin wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
[

Try to think clearly.....The World Series trophy is obviously the goal. The pennant is crucial, as without it, a World Series title is not possible. A divisional championship is important so that a team can avoid the Wild Card. A spot in the playoffs even if it is through the Wild Card is great, as it still makes a Championship possible. The crosstown cup has no bearing on any of this, except for the fact that any wins in the crosstown games matter for the team's overall record. The games matter no more than any other and that cup means nothing.


lots of talk about The Cup for a guy who doesn't value The Cup


Only in response to your posts to me. The Cubs have a team built to truly contend and placing any importance on some crosstown series is really silly. I really hope Maddon doesn't get goofy and try to manipulate the rotation in any way in an attempt to have Arrieta and Lester pitch in those games. I remember in past seasons, where managers had guys take an extras rest, so they could be held back to pitch in the crosstown. I get in a season where nothing much is expected and the team is tanking, that might make sense to try to give some fans a measure of joy that they at least beat the crosstown rival. But those days are over.

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/