Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Matt Latos
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=99608		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Matt Latos
Rick Hahn can also find future Cy Young candidates on the scrap heap
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
I guess it must be because he is comfortable because of Frazier and Navarro's presence. Genius!
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Robin will probably pull him after six but I think I would let him go. They aren't hitting him and this is a manageable pitch count
Author:  America [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Hard to ask for a better way for the starters to open the season.
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
America wrote:
Hard to ask for a better way for the starters to open the season.


I think Danks will be fine tomorrow in snowy conditions with an Indian lineup missing its key piece.
Author:  America [ Thu Apr 07, 2016 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Danks just has to be decent about 2/3 of the times he takes the mound for me to be satisfied. I sense an All Star apperance for Rodon this year.
Author:  Bagels [ Fri Apr 08, 2016 8:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
looks like a meth addict
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Hahnjob
Author:  Beardown [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
I still think Latos will end up being mediocre. Which is fine for your 4th starter. That's what most 4th starters are. But if he is above average, Sox will win the division. Cuz then you have 4 good pitchers to make up for Danks horrible starts.

If Danks continues to be bad he'll go to the bullpen in the 2nd half. What's the name of pretty good pitcher we have in the minors? He'll be up.
Author:  City of Fools [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
I've always liked Latos. Thought it was a good pickup.
Author:  good dolphin [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Beardown wrote:
I still think Latos will end up being mediocre. Which is fine for your 4th starter. That's what most 4th starters are. But if he is above average, Sox will win the division. Cuz then you have 4 good pitchers to make up for Danks horrible starts.

If Danks continues to be bad he'll go to the bullpen in the 2nd half. What's the name of pretty good pitcher we have in the minors? He'll be up.


He's always been good when healthy.

I think he is pitching well because the presence of Navarro and Frazier make him comfortable
Author:  Keyser Soze [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
sss
Author:  Cashman [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
He has a weird windup. Kinda like, he is going to hurt his arm.
Author:  America [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
I give Herm the benefit of the doubt when it comes to pitchers staying healthy. His work with Sale is a minor miracle.
Author:  312player [ Thu Apr 14, 2016 7:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Crafty vet..better than I thought, good pickup.
Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Early Front runner for best FA signing of the year. 3 Million dollars.
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Exhibit A as to why you don't give the John Fucking Lackeys of the world 16 million a year. And then have everyone talk about how you can just make a trade at the deadline for a starter. "We don't like to pay for past performance". This signing is going to piss me off all year.

thread hijack over.
Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Peoria Matt wrote:
Exhibit A as to why you don't give the John Fucking Lackeys of the world 16 million a year. And then have everyone talk about how you can just make a trade at the deadline for a starter. "We don't like to pay for past performance". This signing is going to piss me off all year.

thread hijack over.

I cant imagine you would have been happy with just signing Latos though. He's coming off two injury riddled mediocre years.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
You could say the same about the John Fucking Dankes too.
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
rogers park bryan wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Exhibit A as to why you don't give the John Fucking Lackeys of the world 16 million a year. And then have everyone talk about how you can just make a trade at the deadline for a starter. "We don't like to pay for past performance". This signing is going to piss me off all year.

thread hijack over.

I cant imagine you would have been happy with just signing Latos though. He's coming off two injury riddled mediocre years.


You're probably right.

But this is twice that Theo has done this. You don't give a 37 year old that kind of money.
Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Peoria Matt wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Peoria Matt wrote:
Exhibit A as to why you don't give the John Fucking Lackeys of the world 16 million a year. And then have everyone talk about how you can just make a trade at the deadline for a starter. "We don't like to pay for past performance". This signing is going to piss me off all year.

thread hijack over.

I cant imagine you would have been happy with just signing Latos though. He's coming off two injury riddled mediocre years.


You're probably right.

But this is twice that Theo has done this. You don't give a 37 year old that kind of money.

Id have preferred Zimmerman. But yea, not just Latos. But they could have absolutely signed Latos for rotation depth.
Author:  Juiced [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Peoria Matt wrote:
Exhibit A as to why you don't give the John Fucking Lackeys of the world 16 million a year. And then have everyone talk about how you can just make a trade at the deadline for a starter. "We don't like to pay for past performance". This signing is going to piss me off all year.

thread hijack over.


Relax nutjobs. Latos pitched two games this year :lol: and you have him for FA signing of the year. The Twins have not even won a game this year, so I wouldn't read too much into this start or the one against the 4-6 A's.

Lackey is 2-0 and all that matters is he got the W and saved the pen(JORR 2014). It's not like he is pitching like the Shark did for you guys last year. 6-7 innings with less then 3 runs. I'll take that every time.

R E L A X and enjoy the W's against the AL's bottom feeders. Lets talk when they beat KC or DET.

:lol: Sox fans are funny, like a clown!
Image
Author:  rogers park bryan [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 7:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
I'm not a Sox fan and you're posting below replacement level.
Author:  Juiced [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
rogers park bryan wrote:
I'm not a Sox fan and you're posting below replacement level.


I didn't say you where a Sox fan. I said they make me laugh. You just make me cringe.
Image
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
With all of the drama surrounding BRick's tournament thus year, I propose next year he seeds the worst 64 posters on the board and let us decide who is the absolute worst on the board. Juiced would have a real good shot to make the final four.
Author:  Juiced [ Fri Apr 15, 2016 8:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Frank Coztansa wrote:
With all of the drama surrounding BRick's tournament thus year, I propose next year he seeds the worst 64 posters on the board and let us decide who is the absolute worst on the board. Juiced would have a real good shot to make the final four.


I don't stand a chance against you Frank.
Author:  America [ Sun Apr 24, 2016 4:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Matt Latos
Didnt have his stuff today but 6 IP 1 ER is very solid.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/