The worst was Fielder. Just stay standing on the 3rd base bag.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| The White Sox weird triple play https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=99929 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Beardown [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | The White Sox weird triple play |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hRPCPP9yUk The dynamics of this bases loaded triple play was interesting 1. Prince Fielder was the runner at 3rd. Because he's fat, he wasn't tagging. He went half way. Anybody that has decent speed would have tagged knowing he's got it. Then again, Fielder still should have still tagged, despite being fat, knowing if the ball got down, he would have scored anyway. So he fucked up. 2. Throw to first by Eaton to get the runner off the base that thought it was getting down. That guy fucked up as well for being so far off. But the key was Abreu not tagging him right away. Him scrambling to try to tag him is what led Fielder to make a break for home. Thus, the weird triple play. You'll never see that play again. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
You would think score update people would celebrate that tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 10:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
There were 3 bad running baseball decisions by the Rangers that made it possible. Two by Fielder on one play. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Beardown wrote: There were 3 bad running baseball decisions by the Rangers that made it possible. Two by Fielder on one play. The worst was by the runner on first. How did he overrun the bag by three steps when trying to return to first base? Slide, dumbass. |
|
| Author: | newper [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Yeah, but the guy on 2nd thinking Fielder is actually going to hustle home? |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Chus wrote: Beardown wrote: There were 3 bad running baseball decisions by the Rangers that made it possible. Two by Fielder on one play. The worst was by the runner on first. How did he overrun the bag by three steps when trying to return to first base? Slide, dumbass. You're right. I guess there were 4 bad running plays then. 2 by both guys. The guy at first shouldn't have been that far off the base after it was hit. And, like you said, he should have made a slide into 1st on the way back. |
|
| Author: | America [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
In the past that ball gets down and the Rangers win that game. Credit the defense for executing, it does seem like a new Sox. |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
so the 2015 white sox were the base runners and the 2016 white sox competently completed a run down? |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Beardown wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hRPCPP9yUk The dynamics of this bases loaded triple play was interesting 1. Prince Fielder was the runner at 3rd. Because he's fat, he wasn't tagging. He went half way. Anybody that has decent speed would have tagged knowing he's got it. Then again, Fielder still should have still tagged, despite being fat, knowing if the ball got down, he would have scored anyway. So he fucked up. 2. Throw to first by Eaton to get the runner off the base that thought it was getting down. That guy fucked up as well for being so far off. But the key was Abreu not tagging him right away. Him scrambling to try to tag him is what led Fielder to make a break for home. Thus, the weird triple play. You'll never see that play again. Obviously Eaton is on PEDs. |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Darkside wrote: Beardown wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hRPCPP9yUk The dynamics of this bases loaded triple play was interesting 1. Prince Fielder was the runner at 3rd. Because he's fat, he wasn't tagging. He went half way. Anybody that has decent speed would have tagged knowing he's got it. Then again, Fielder still should have still tagged, despite being fat, knowing if the ball got down, he would have scored anyway. So he fucked up. 2. Throw to first by Eaton to get the runner off the base that thought it was getting down. That guy fucked up as well for being so far off. But the key was Abreu not tagging him right away. Him scrambling to try to tag him is what led Fielder to make a break for home. Thus, the weird triple play. You'll never see that play again. Obviously Eaton is on PEDs. We gonna do this? Really? Why does my obvious and fair question about Arietta bother you so much? It really shouldn't. He's probably on PEDs. If you're fine with that, fine. But to deny it cuz he wears Cubbie blue is weird. I'm a Sox fan and I know damn well that Jim Thome was on Roids. Despite him being the nicest person in the world according to Reinsdorf. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Fri Apr 22, 2016 11:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Beardown wrote: Darkside wrote: Beardown wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hRPCPP9yUk The dynamics of this bases loaded triple play was interesting 1. Prince Fielder was the runner at 3rd. Because he's fat, he wasn't tagging. He went half way. Anybody that has decent speed would have tagged knowing he's got it. Then again, Fielder still should have still tagged, despite being fat, knowing if the ball got down, he would have scored anyway. So he fucked up. 2. Throw to first by Eaton to get the runner off the base that thought it was getting down. That guy fucked up as well for being so far off. But the key was Abreu not tagging him right away. Him scrambling to try to tag him is what led Fielder to make a break for home. Thus, the weird triple play. You'll never see that play again. Obviously Eaton is on PEDs. We gonna do this? Really? Why does my obvious and fair question about Arietta bother you so much? It really shouldn't. He's probably on PEDs. If you're fine with that, fine. But to deny it cuz he wears Cubbie blue is weird. I'm a Sox fan and I know damn well that Jim Thome was on Roids. Despite him being the nicest person in the world according to Reinsdorf. Easy, Goff. I ain't trying to front ya. I'm just sayin... you don't get a triple play like that without being on PEDs. Anyone can see it. Why are you so mad about it? It's not like everyone doesn't know it |
|
| Author: | Beardown [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Alright, playa. Gotcha. Anyway, a lot of shit is goin' down at my crib right now. I got bitches in the living room gettin' it on and they ain't leavin' til six in the mourn!!!! |
|
| Author: | America [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 1:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
How mad can Cubs fans be? LETS RECAP BEFORE ANSWERING: ACT ONE Cubs' PED using fraud who couldn't hackit in the majors goes down to AAAA and no-hits some garbage roster designed to lose and gets minor pub. ACT TWO Debate inexplicably ensures; delusional Cubs fans (oxymoron) cling to false hope that the man responsible for the least impressive no hitter in MLB history is not using steroids. Sox fans, harbingers of truth that they have always been, are the beacons of enlightenment in this Brave New World of willful ignorance and superstition. ACT THREE Goodness prevails. Sox turn historic triple play that overshadows the accomplishments of one fraudlent bearded meme; Cubs fans are eternally upset that one out of the 366 (leap year, right?) nights of this year, 2016, belong to the White Sox. The spectre of the Cubs' is not yet vanquished however, the bearded meme remains strong boosted by his PEDs and borderline AAA rosters he succeeds against... SEQUEL FORTHCOMING.... but to answer the initial question... Cubs fans are quite upset. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
The worst was Fielder. Just stay standing on the 3rd base bag.
|
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Beardown wrote: Alright, playa. Gotcha. Anyway, a lot of shit is goin' down at my crib right now. I got bitches in the living room gettin' it on and they ain't leavin' til six in the mourn!!!! 
|
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
A Little League triple play if ever there was one. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Will this be the peak of their season? |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
leashyourkids wrote: Will this be the peak of their season? They are expecting a rush of ticket buyers at the gates, could be hundreds! |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
America wrote: delusional Cubs fans (oxymoron) 
|
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
leashyourkids wrote: Will this be the peak of their season? 
|
|
| Author: | Rod [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
America wrote: In the past that ball gets down and the Rangers win that game. Credit the defense for executing, it does seem like a new Sox. Quintana was trying his best to Quintana and Ventura let him face two batters too many. Caught a HUGE break there. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 9:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Look at all the jealous Cubs fans. Sad that the White Sox are blocking their shine. |
|
| Author: | America [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: America wrote: In the past that ball gets down and the Rangers win that game. Credit the defense for executing, it does seem like a new Sox. Quintana was trying his best to Quintana and Ventura let him face two batters too many. Caught a HUGE break there. I'd much rather have lucky winning Jose Quintana than unlucky losing Jose Quintana. |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Look at all the jealous Cubs fans. Sad that the White Sox are blocking their shine. No, I think Prince Fielder's fat ass was blocking shine, among other things. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
I am still getting over the fact I was so supposed to be upset about a play I didnt know that happened until America just informed me as a cubs fan I should be upset! Guess I am not doing my part as a Cubs fan. Now that Drake is gone, they had time to work on that kind of play in spring training. Made it all different. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 2:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Triple Play > no hitter with 4 walks |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 2:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Triple Play > no hitter with 4 walks You are a treasure. Glad you are back around here. Try to not get banned again.
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 2:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
I am a treasure trove of truth. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
|
|
| Author: | America [ Sat Apr 23, 2016 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: The White Sox weird triple play |
RFDC wrote: It's called the American League, Jake. I'm sure you remember... 
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|