Bagels wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Bagels wrote:
i'll take that as a yes
And i'll take it as not relevant as the circumstances are different.
what circumstances are different ?
can i get a translator in here ?
You obviously don't care about Sato so let me cut to the chase.
First off when a guy that is very close in ability and accomplishment does to Curry what Kyrie did (in the Finals over a 7 game series head to head) its stupid to call someone stupid for thinking that the guy might be better
It is far more relevant for me to see a guy outplay someone head to head than it is to see them tear up someone else. For example is it a bigger deal if Curry destroys Kyriie Irving or D.J. Augustine?
The reason that guys like you looked foolish and continue to look foolish is because prior to the hookup none of you had even considered it. You did the same thing you always do. Dismiss it out of hand yet laud and applaud jerks on here that claim "Harden never plays point" "McAdoo was the first stretch 4 not Dirk" or "Lonzo is a stud".
Its not that you believed Steph was better. Its that "you're a dumbass for even thinking that Kyrie might take him". You came out of it looking foolish just like you did on a vast majority of other things. Instead of folding the tent and pushing on some of you continue to forge on hoping to get your lick back.
Then you preach to everyone else about insecurities when its obvious that the insecurities exists within you. Mad because someone challenges you about a sports topic. How insecure is that?
why in the world in a discussion involving Young and Satoransky are you bringing up Steph/Kyrie ?
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
