Tall Midget wrote:
You don't see the basis for my comment? Have you read anything you wrote in this thread? Did you even know that Nas argued the Bulls should select Roy in the draft before I mentioned this fact? It doesn't seem like it. Your uninformed commentary is pretty revealing of your agenda in this thread, don't you think?
As for your comment on the Bulls, you're equivocating. Your assessment of the team's nucleus wasn't based on actual value--there's no evidence it ever had any "real" value anyway--but what you believed was its potential value. A few months ago you seemed to believe the team had substantial potential, but now you don't. That's a radical shift given that NBA potential is usually realized over the course of several years, not half a season.
Yes I knew Nas advocated drafting Roy in the 2006 draft as he has mentioned in several times in our basketball conversations. I think your agenda is a little more revealing. I havent had one, but its clear your only purpose for being involved in this thread is to try to attack my position, using poor assumptions and exagerations, which is fine. Also once again, you're just making shit up. Ive never said the team had substantial potential and think they suck now. I never said at the end of last season that I really liked this team at all ever. I said BEFORE last season that I did, as I had no reason to expect the huge dropoff from Kirk, Luol, etc. I also liked the Tyrus pick, as I have said, and having swept Miami the year before in the playoffs I thought we were close. I was way off. At the end of last season I was pretty upset with the team, as were many fans. So again, get your facts straight. But just to clarify this one last time, although Im sure you will continue to misconstrue it, I dont think everyone on this team is unsalvageable and sucks. Overall I said noone is untouchable, except Rose. This was more or less the same opinion I held six months ago. I think Tyrus can be a very good player. I think Noah can be an ok starter. I think Ben Gordon is a terrific scorer with no other discernible skills who is bound to get overpaid. Kirk is a decent all around guard, but is overpaid. I wouldnt pay $10million/year for what I consider a third guard. Im not sure what to think on Luol, as I havent seen much of him this season and he was hurt alot last year. He might turn out to be decent and make his contract a bargain one. I wouldnt mind keeping him, but I'd trade him for sure for the right price. I think the biggest problem has been coaching. These players arent developing and Boylan was a horrible coach and Vinny doesnt seem to be much better really. So I think the team still has potential in the sense that they should be better than they have been. I think you see some of that in some of the wins we have had over good teams this year. I just think coaching should be the biggest issue this offseason, and then roster management.
Also you dont seem to have much knowledge when it comes to just how dramatically perceived value changes in just a few short months. Its not directly proportional to talent or realized potential. Just look at players like Greg Oden. How much has his value changed over the past 12 months? How bout Rondo? How bout a player like Jameer Nelson? How about Amare? A year ago Im sure there were going to be much better offers for him instead of the Gooden/Tyrus/#1 pick being the best package any team can come up with according to Chad Ford and a couple other NBA insiders. As Simmons illuded to in his column, teams are realize how bad he is defensively and that he doesnt like playing with other frontcourt players and are even questioning his commitment. These players values have shifted pretty dramatically over the course of the last 12 months. I would have more examples but Im short on time right now and as Ive repeatedly said, I havent been able to follow the league very much this season.