It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 1:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

Is Jerry Reinsdorf Cheap?
Yes 69%  69%  [ 22 ]
No 31%  31%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 32
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.


Nah Brickster. You'd be wrong. There was slippage in 90's NBA basketball. That was by far the worst era since I became a fan of the league.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.


Take Rodman off that team and they don't go 72-10. Nothing wrong with having him on both teams (Bulls win in this scenario).

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:49 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.



What if he plays on both? I think RPB is underestimating those Pistons teams. They were about as deep as any team in NBA history and Isiah was as good a finisher as Jordan when the chips were down.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.


That '86 Celtics team would be the toughest matchup.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.
Why not take Jordan off the Bulls too?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I'm just gonna say it... Jordan's not even in my top 10 all-time.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.



What if he plays on both? I think RPB is underestimating those Pistons teams. They were about as deep as any team in NBA history and Isiah was as good a finisher as Jordan when the chips were down.



Yep. The Pistons Easily could have had 4 rings. They had Boston the year Isiah made the bad inbounds pass to lose a game. They had the Lakers the year Isaiah Twisted his ankle in the Finals. Those were winnable series against All Time Great TEams. The Pistons were 2 Deep at every position it seemed

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:52 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.



Sure, they could have. But they may not have. The Bulls never beat anything like the best Bird Celtics or prime Magic Lakers in their championship runs. Probably the best team they beat was the Knicks with Stark and Mason.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Yep. The Pistons Easily could have had 4 rings. They had Boston the year Isiah made the bad inbounds pass to lose a game. They had the Lakers the year Isaiah Twisted his ankle in the Finals. Those were winnable series against All Time Great TEams. The Pistons were 2 Deep at every position it seemed
The Bulls easily could have had 8 rings then.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
leashyourkids wrote:
I'm just gonna say it... Jordan's not even in my top 10 all-time.


Quote:
This post was made by leashyourkids who is currently on your ignore list.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Yep. The Pistons Easily could have had 4 rings. They had Boston the year Isiah made the bad inbounds pass to lose a game. They had the Lakers the year Isaiah Twisted his ankle in the Finals. Those were winnable series against All Time Great TEams. The Pistons were 2 Deep at every position it seemed
The Bulls easily could have had 8 rings then.


Agreed. Against inferior competition however. Which of the teams that they beat to win were as good as any of the four teams that I listed?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
There are scenarios where Jordan could have played his whole career without winning a championship and nobody would be talking about him as the "greatest of all-time."

I don't think that's true. It's certainly true for every other sport, but one player has such a disproportionate influence on a basketball game that if you look back through the history of the sport, all the greatest players eventually at least win 1. Even Wilt did. I feel confident saying Jordan was always going to win at least one championship, he was too good not to at some point in his career. I'll agree there are other scenarios where he would have been less successful and not looked at the greatest ever though.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.



What if he plays on both? I think RPB is underestimating those Pistons teams. They were about as deep as any team in NBA history and Isiah was as good a finisher as Jordan when the chips were down.

I loved those Pistons team, they were very good. I dont think they were better than the best Bulls team. Isaiah was a good finisher, Jordan was the best ever.



The Pistons get young Rodman, the Bulls get older Rodman. Bulls win in a series.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.



Sure, they could have. But they may not have. The Bulls never beat anything like the best Bird Celtics or prime Magic Lakers in their championship runs. Probably the best team they beat was the Knicks with Stark and Mason.

The 93 Suns were better than that Knicks team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
FrankDrebin wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I'm just gonna say it... Jordan's not even in my top 10 all-time.


Quote:
This post was made by leashyourkids who is currently on your ignore list.


:lol:

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Those mid 90s Houston teams would have been a problem for the Bulls.

Not saying the Rockets would win, but I think the series would have gone 7 games easily.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
The Suns were probably better, but the Knicks were a worse matchup. They killed da Bull inside.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
rogers park bryan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
long time guy wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Rodman plays on the Pistons in my scenario.



What if he plays on both? I think RPB is underestimating those Pistons teams. They were about as deep as any team in NBA history and Isiah was as good a finisher as Jordan when the chips were down.

I loved those Pistons team, they were very good. I dont think they were better than the best Bulls team.

The Pistons get young Rodman, the Bulls get older Rodman. Bulls win in a series.


I would probably agree with you on about 1-2 (2nd 3peat) of those Bulls teams. If you take Rodman of the Bulls and leave him with those teams they take the Bulls I believe. The Bulls had an easier road to the Championship than any of the teams that won in the 80's. That is my essential point. It doesn't detract that much from what they accomplished but I always like to factor in the quality of competition when making these type of assessments.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.

Seriously, im not going to get into a pages long debate but the 72-10 team would murder the best Pistons team.


Isiaah's excuses about fatigue aside, that stopped holding water in '91.

That one Sixers team and maybe not the Showtime Lakers wouldn't have been easy, but they could've matched up well with them.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
Agreed. Against inferior competition however. Which of the teams that they had to beat were as good as any of the four teams that I listed?
We remember teams differently that win a championship compared to those who don't so it really isn't a fair comparison there. I will say that the Bulls took the championship winning Pistons to 7 games and then crushed them a year later so I'm pretty sure they would have beaten them at their prime too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79664
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.



Sure, they could have. But they may not have. The Bulls never beat anything like the best Bird Celtics or prime Magic Lakers in their championship runs. Probably the best team they beat was the Knicks with Stark and Mason.

The 93 Suns were better than that Knicks team.


Maybe. I don't ever remember thinking they could beat the Bulls though. I actually thought the Knicks might. And they had them down 2-0, didn't they?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Kash, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
The Bulls benefited tremendously from the decline (Pistons, Celtics, Lakers, Philly) of some great teams. Their ascension occurred as the league was becoming a tadbit more balanced. They benefitted greatly from that. None of their Championship teams could have defeated any of the teams that I listed when they were really good.

JLN: I've got some bad takes to share.
ltg: Hold my beer.



I'm not 100% sure that the best Bulls team couldn't have beaten some of the teams he mentioned, but what LTG is saying isn't outlandish. I'm sure they weren't going to run off a threepeat if they had to go against those teams.

I'm willing to accept that those teams may have put up a better fight but the Bulls could have beaten any of those teams.



Sure, they could have. But they may not have. The Bulls never beat anything like the best Bird Celtics or prime Magic Lakers in their championship runs. Probably the best team they beat was the Knicks with Stark and Mason.

The 93 Suns were better than that Knicks team.

As were the Jazz.

I still think the Pacers were the best team the Bulls faced but they get knocked down because they couldn't meet them in the finals.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Those Jazz teams would thump any team LeBron was on that won a ring, they'd thump the Shakless Lakers and Garnett's Celts too.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Agreed. Against inferior competition however. Which of the teams that they had to beat were as good as any of the four teams that I listed?
We remember teams differently that win a championship compared to those who don't so it really isn't a fair comparison there. I will say that the Bulls took the championship winning Pistons to 7 games and then crushed them a year later so I'm pretty sure they would have beaten them at their prime too.


No, teams that lose can still be considered great teams. Those Boston Philly and Lakers teams that lost are still remembered as great teams. So was the Pistons team that lost to the Lakers in 7 and Boston the year before.

The Pistons teams that got "crushed" was on its last legs. The Team that the Bulls took to 7 during the previous year still won the Championship.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92226
Location: To the left of my post
long time guy wrote:
No, teams that lose can still be considered great teams. Those Boston Philly and Lakers teams that lost are still remembered as great teams. So was the Pistons team that lost to the Lakers in 7 and Boston the year before.
They are remembered as great teams because they won a title around the same time they lost others.

long time guy wrote:
The Pistons teams that got "crushed" was on its last legs. The Team that the Bulls took to 7 during the previous year still won the Championship.
You gave the Pistons 4 hypothetical titles. The Bulls almost beat one of the two teams they had that actually won the title. The Bulls almost certainly improved after that and yet you don't think they would have a chance to beat the team they already took to 7 games?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 256 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group