long time guy wrote:
Dunn looked bad last year. I don't doubt that but if you are to blast GarPax, which is a cottage industry for you then you have to blast the guy that drafted him. He may not be a good pro but I'm not willing to give up on him because of Thibs and I'm sure a buck passer like you would blast Hoiberg if he'd put up the same stats with the Bulls.
Dunn decreased his value last year and Butler increased his. I'm a lot more inclined to praise the front office that traded away a devalued asset for one with a higher value. You should be much more ready to rip GarPax for making a lottery pick bust one of their key desired pieces than you are to blast Thibs for a draft pick not working out. Indeed, the fact that he got so much value for a draft pick that didn't work out is more praiseworthy than the pick itself is worthy of criticism.
Quote:
It's funny how you are quick to believe that which you believe to be positive about Butler too but nothing that may be negative. He pursued free agents. You don't know that. Dwayne Wade doesn't qualify as a big signing as this point.
He's arguably a bigger signing than anyone that GarPax have successfully signed. If we're taking Reinsdorf's precious revenue into account, he definitely is. If you want to hold recruiting Wade against him, then perhaps you have a better alternative? Maybe we should be ripping Butler for not handing the lazy ass front office Durant instead on a silver platter?
Quote:
This dude had multiple instances of showing people up so the whole where are the reports angle is garbage. Friedell and Sam Smith reported on it as it happened. Rajon Rondo called him on his bullshit and you could seem him demonstrating it during some of the games.
Rondo called him on it because he had to pretend to be a good teammate since he was never playing again in the NBA if he got cut. Again, if criticizing teammates is such a damnable offense, then maybe MJ truly shouldn't have been untradeable?
Quote:
You also have no problem believing that the Bulls could have gotten a better deal. Why? Because it reflects poorly on management. You are a one note song.
You have no problem going along with their spin that it was the best available deal because you are even more wed to your criticisms of Butler. Don't take my word for it though:
@MikeGiardi Danny Ainge said C's weren't in any recent talks for just moved Jimmy Butler. Source says not true. C's engaged on Butler til the end (1/2)
@MikeGiardi (2/2) Source states unequivocally C's had better offer on table than Minny surrendered, including flip of firsts - 3 for 16 (*wrote 7*).
Quote:
As far as apologizing I've gone on record multiple times and stated how management should be whacked. You are lying about that. I'm not a guy that has an ax to grind with them like you. You have no objectivity where they are concerned.
You're still happy to carry water for them though when it comes time to blame the players or coaches they've shipped off instead of where the focus should rightly be aimed. You're still happy to defend Hoiberg's coaching abilities despite being unable to name a single thing he does well aside from a vague notion of "meeting expectations." I am in fact completely objective about what massive failures Foreman and Paxson have been; the mere fact that I have arrived at an (accurate) extreme judgment doesn't sit well with your own personal petty beefs focused on players and coaches you dislike more instead.