Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
If he works out, then all that means is we were able to squeeze a good year out of a player that has been constantly injured in his past. Then the front office will sign a fellow top-level player, only to eventually lose Boozer (because there is no way we get two straight solid years from him, IMO) and are now stuck with one player instead of two.
I dunno, I guess if the Bulls are comfortable with the risk then this is a moot point. I still contend, however, that there are cheaper players out there with similar skill and less injuries.
There is zero risk with this move. He will only be here for one year, everyone knows that. If he sucks, that's okay, you have a good size expiring contract. If he's good, that's okay too. Maybe the Bulls can make a little noise and gain a little playoff experience.
This team will probably have a similar finish as last year, no one is expecting a championship run, it's all about 2010. Bringing in Boozer will help our chances at acquiring two big name guys. This is a no lose situation.
_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?