ZephMarshack wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Yeah but i never recalled you commenting about tanking either way.
I said that the decision to tank or not tank is insignificant if the same clowns are still running the show. And despite the fact that the revolutionary decision to tank was made, they still revealed their own clownishness yet again and appear to have alienated even the most ardent pro-tankers.
Quote:
When they were getting the doors blown off earlier in the season you bashed the hell out of them (predictably) for their inability to win. I remember stating that this was a lost/tanking season anyway so what did it matter.
Uh what? At most I recall laughing at Hoiberg's inconsistent rotations, which were justified under the guise of "young player development" as much as just trying to lose as much as possible.
Quote:
They won just enough to get out of the top five pick and demonstrated that they were better than most anticipated and now you are bashing them for failing at tanking.
Wow, so maybe we should be praising GarPax for defying expectations! It's not a matter of being
worse at tanking than other teams but instead the front office being
better at talent acquisition! I love how quickly you can switch into full blown apologist mode for a front office that's never won anything when I correctly point out that they're the problem.
Quote:
You were never in favor of tanking anyway. You only take anti GarPax positions. That is the only play that you ever make.
I've been consistently ambivalent about the decision to tank or not tank but thought it should 100% not be in the hands of the very front office that necessitated any kind of tanking in the first place. Look at the front offices of the teams the Bulls are "competing" with: the majority have been in power less than 2 years. The few who have been around longer are all generally on the hot seat. The only GM who's been around nearly as long as Paxson is Donnie Nelson, who, you know, actually has a title to his name.
This is one of the main problems with treating the mere act of tanking itself as some kind of panacea. It matters who's actually overseing any kind of tanking effort, which is why I find so many of your long asides about whether tanking is or is not
the key to winning to be overly theoretical and somewhat beside the point. Generally if you've failed as a GM, I'm going to be a lot more skeptical about your decision as to when to start tanking and your ability to actually execute it properly. Someone like Hinkie made the decision to pull the plug on the treadmill immediately and was quite adept at dumping the guys that would result in an undesirably high draft pick for long-term assets.
GarPax meanwhile seem to have been on autopilot for the vast majority of the season and until the all-star break were comfortable with passively losing games, something that's a huge drawback when there were multiple teams actively losing during the entire course of the season. And before you bring up the Mirotic trade, I praised the return they got for it compared to the other deadline deals, but it's quite clear you don't believe the Pelicans' pick is a good enough trade-off for missing out on a top 5 pick.
So you admit to being the rather convenient "ambivalent" about tanking? Damned if you do damned if you don't is how i see it.
As far as inconsistent rotations go what are you talking about? The main reason that the Bulls were 3-20 was because guys (Mirotic, Dunn, Lavine, Nwaba) were injured and Portis was suspended. It had nothing to do with coaching and everything to do with talent. Again your position will always be that of anti management so why bother.
If anything this season has served as validation of a few things
1. The decision to whack Thibs was the right one. Guys like Barkley, Jet Smith, Pierce, and Jalen Rose have all questioned the coaching of Thibs.
2. Hoiberg can coach. Maybe not championship level but he is far from the worse coach in the league. Guys are developing under him and the Bulls rebounded after a disastrous start.
3. GarPax got the better of the Butler trade. Very few if any on here believed it at the time of the trade. Obvious now.
4. They fucked this tank job up.
Your diatribes about the alleged ineptitude of management are also off base.
This is the same team that I.D.d guys like Deng, Noah, Rose , Butler, and now Markannen.
Interesting how you gloss over all of this when providing critiques. I don't remember you touting the ability of Markannen either.
This same team that you bash for being inept plucked arguably the best player from last years draft. If not then no lower than 3rd.
They also drafted Portis with the 22nd pick. Do you care to go over a list of the guys drafted ahead of him? Something tells me you don't.
When you talk about "who leads" then that sort of thing can't be discounted. They have repeatedly demonstrated that they can draft. I'm not a Gar fan either.
Noah Vonleh also looks like a solid piece also.
_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.