It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 5:54 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 2:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Rose vs Ball
Hamilton vs Lavine
Deng vs DeRozan
Boozer vs Patrick Williams/Green
Noah vs Vucevic

Bench mob (Korver, Brewer, Gibson) vs Caruso, Ayo, Jones, White, etc.

I like the grit of the 2010-11 team, best embodied by guys like Deng, Gibson, and Noah, and I like the dynamic playmaking of this year's team. The thing we lacked in 2010 was guy who could create his own shot besides Rose, which is why I hated the Hamilton signing. Such a dumbass thing to do. This year we've got three guys who can get their own shot and it's awesome to see. Four if you count White.

If we can add some more grit before the deadline I think I'd take this team over Rose's team.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Last edited by veganfan21 on Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 2:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
veganfan21 wrote:
Rose vs Ball
Hamilton vs Lavine
Deng vs DeRozan
Boozer vs Patrick Williams/Green
Noah vs Vucevic

Bench mob (Korver, Brewer, Gibson) vs Caruso, Ayo, Jones, White, etc.

I like the grit of the 2010-11 team, best embodied by guys like Deng, Gibson, and Noah, and I like the dynamic playmaking of this year's team. The thing we lacked in 2010 was guy who could create his own shot besides Rose, which is why I hated the Hamilton signing. Such a dumbass thing to do. This year we've got three guys who can get their own shot and it's awesome to see. Four if you count White.

If we can add some more grit before the deadline I think I'd take this team over Rose's team.


Definitely has been an upgrade on the coaching side. Billy D over Thibs any day of the week.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Last edited by The Missing Link on Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 2:39 pm
Posts: 19521
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Derrick Rose was significantly better than anyone on this Bulls team.

_________________
Why are only 14 percent of black CPS 11th-graders proficient in English?

The Missing Link wrote:
For instance they were never taught that Columbus was a slave owner.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
derrick was a better facilitator on offense but other than that, theyre pretty similar players.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).


In 2010 Keith Bogans was the starting 2 and not Rip Hamilton. That makes a big difference when evaluating the 2 squads

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).


In 2010 Keith Bogans was the starting 2 and not Rip Hamilton. That makes a big difference when evaluating the 2 squads


Either way they're inferior to Lavine though.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).


In 2010 Keith Bogans was the starting 2 and not Rip Hamilton. That makes a big difference when evaluating the 2 squads


Either way they're inferior to Lavine though.


Dropoff from Lavine to Hamilton is significantly less than the dropoff from Lavine to Bogans. Hamilton in his prime would have been a good comp. for Lavine. Even the 2010 version was a solid player if healthy. Bogans was never a comparison for Lavine. Big difference

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).


In 2010 Keith Bogans was the starting 2 and not Rip Hamilton. That makes a big difference when evaluating the 2 squads


Either way they're inferior to Lavine though.


Dropoff from Lavine to Hamilton is significantly less than the dropoff from Lavine to Bogans. Hamilton in his prime would have been a good comp. for Lavine. Even the 2010 version was a solid player if healthy. Bogans was never a comparison for Lavine. Big difference


Hard disagree on Hamilton. His prime is irrelevant here because when he got to the Bulls he was washed up. I never liked the signing. No way Lavine in 2022 and Hamilton on the bulls is close. Lavine was a 9th ranked MVP candidate on NBA.com as recently as last week. Hamilton sucked ass, predictably. Never trust a screen reliant dude as your second best player on offense. That means you don't have any offense after no 1.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
The Missing Link wrote:
2010 Bulls had a better bench and a true superstar. This team has 3 stars but none are superstars. I'd take Vuc over Noah. I'd take Derozan over Deng also. Boozer is better than anyone the Bulls have at the 4. Lavine and Keith Bogans is a non starter and Rose is a huge upgrade over Ball. Bulls 2010 have a huge edge in terms of bench.

As much as I like this team I'd probably go 2010 Bulls based upon overall talent. Probably would be tougher than first thought however. I need to see what AK does at buyout time. Slight tweaking of the roster and this team will be favorites in the East imo. Good players on expiring deals will want to seek to sign here now whereas they didn't before.


I think this team is more talented offensively and less talented defensively. Rose is the best player out of both teams, but Rose/Deng/Boozer or Noah are losing a pickup game against Vuc/DeRozan/Lavine. There are more options on this team than the 2010 Bulls ever had. Against the Heat, when LBJ shut Rose down, you had nowhere to go. Today, if DeRozan is covered or cold, you go to Lavine. If he's covered well, you go to Vuc. If you need some instant offense, you get White to come off the bench. This team can score in ways the 2010 team could only dream about. That was the one thing holding us back that season (non-Rose scoring).


In 2010 Keith Bogans was the starting 2 and not Rip Hamilton. That makes a big difference when evaluating the 2 squads


Either way they're inferior to Lavine though.


Dropoff from Lavine to Hamilton is significantly less than the dropoff from Lavine to Bogans. Hamilton in his prime would have been a good comp. for Lavine. Even the 2010 version was a solid player if healthy. Bogans was never a comparison for Lavine. Big difference


Hard disagree on Hamilton. His prime is irrelevant here because when he got to the Bulls he was washed up. I never liked the signing. No way Lavine in 2022 and Hamilton on the bulls is close. Lavine was a 9th ranked MVP candidate on NBA.com as recently as last week. Hamilton sucked ass, predictably. Never trust a screen reliant dude as your second best player on offense. That means you don't have any offense after no 1.


The difference between 2010 Hamilton and Keith Bogans was immense. Hamilton wasn't great at that time but Bogans was trash. They didn't even have to guard him on offense. avg something like 4 pts per game. Hamilton could still play at that point. He just couldn't stay healthy. Bogans was never good.

Point is moot anyway. Hamilton was never on that 2010 team. Bogans was however.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I don't have a problem with Hamilton vs Bogans. Bogans was a D specialist anyway. Hamilton sucked as a FA signing.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
veganfan21 wrote:
I don't have a problem with Hamilton vs Bogans. Bogans was a D specialist anyway. Hamilton sucked as a FA signing.

Hamilton wasn't on the 2010 squad. Dropoff from Lavine to Bogans is immense.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Derrick Rose was significantly better than anyone on this Bulls team.


Pretty much this.

To LTGs point I like the coaching more on this team than I did Thibs, but the bench for the that team kills this one.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
I dont know that we can go to the place of saying Rose was "significantly" better. Derozan and Lavine are pretty damn good right now. Rose was better, but I don't think it is as big of a gap as some think.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
I dont know that we can go to the place of saying Rose was "significantly" better. Derozan and Lavine are pretty damn good right now. Rose was better, but I don't think it is as big of a gap as some think.


Agrees.

Rose vs DeRozan goes to Rose
Rose vs Lavine goes to Rose. That might change next year.

But

Rose/Deng/Boozer vs DeRozan/Zach/Vuc goes to the latter.

2010 was deeper but this team is more top heavy.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Derrick Rose was significantly better than anyone on this Bulls team.


Pretty much this.

To LTGs point I like the coaching more on this team than I did Thibs, but the bench for the that team kills this one.


Caruso, Ayo and White are pretty damn good. Short, but good. Add a banger and it's even imo.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
RFDC wrote:
I dont know that we can go to the place of saying Rose was "significantly" better. Derozan and Lavine are pretty damn good right now. Rose was better, but I don't think it is as big of a gap as some think.


And the Bulls 2nd and 3rd best players on this year's team is better than the 2nd and 3rd best players on the 2010 teams. If Lavine is the best player on this team then Derozan is 2nd best. He is better (and might be significantly better) than anyone on that 2010 team. Vuc is better than the 3rd best player as well.

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
veganfan21 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Derrick Rose was significantly better than anyone on this Bulls team.


Pretty much this.

To LTGs point I like the coaching more on this team than I did Thibs, but the bench for the that team kills this one.


Caruso, Ayo and White are pretty damn good. Short, but good. Add a banger and it's even imo.


Absolutely.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 9:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24086
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 9:37 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
2010

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.


Well noted except for the last point. They lost 1-4, wasn't tight.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
veganfan21 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.


Well noted except for the last point. They lost 1-4, wasn't tight.


and that super team played down to their competition. it wasnt close.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24086
pizza_Place: Pizanos
veganfan21 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.


Well noted except for the last point. They lost 1-4, wasn't tight.

Every game except the Bulls’ win was reasonably close.

One memorably came down to lebron shutting down DRose on a final possession. Another was an OT loss.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13259
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.


Well noted except for the last point. They lost 1-4, wasn't tight.

Every game except the Bulls’ win was reasonably close.

One memorably came down to lebron shutting down DRose on a final possession. Another was an OT loss.

The Vikings played a lot of close games this year too.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 03, 2022 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24086
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I think it’s worth noting the ‘10-‘11 Bulls won 62 games, had the league MVP and made it to the ECF before losing a reasonably tight series to a super team.


Well noted except for the last point. They lost 1-4, wasn't tight.

Every game except the Bulls’ win was reasonably close.

One memorably came down to lebron shutting down DRose on a final possession. Another was an OT loss.

The Vikings played a lot of close games this year too.

Maybe they’ll close out the season with the best regular season record, a 1 seed and an eventual loss in the nfc championship.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24086
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Seems worthy of a bump given the bored reaction after these last two games.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seems worthy of a bump given the bored reaction after these last two games.

Board loves to overreact to local teams losses. Ideally every Chicago team would go undefeated every year and if not everyone should be fired

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2021 5:29 am
Posts: 15235
pizza_Place: Eduardo's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seems worthy of a bump given the bored reaction after these last two games.


That first Thibs team was remarkably healthy, played In a less competitive conference and never had to deal with things like Covid Protocols either

Not to mention that his team played for a coach who believed that he could somehow win a championship in the regular season

_________________
pittmike wrote:
Technically I was drunk (big surprise) and asked her if she liked a tongue up her ass.


Frank Coztansa wrote:
Again, your comprehension needs work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 24086
pizza_Place: Pizanos
FavreFan wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Seems worthy of a bump given the bored reaction after these last two games.

Board loves to overreact to local teams losses. Ideally every Chicago team would go undefeated every year and if not everyone should be fired

I think this thread suggests the bored likes to overreact to teams winning.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 32 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group