Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Bulls@ Nets
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=132691		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  St. Louis Bull Man [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Bulls@ Nets
NM
Author:  denisdman [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
St. Louis Bull Man wrote:
NM


Not a swing state
Author:  The Doctor Of Style [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 7:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
Zach Lavine does everything as a basketball player to help you lose games. It's uncanny how many things he does as a player that negatively impacts the Bulls ability to win.
Author:  Nardi [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.
Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?
Author:  The Doctor Of Style [ Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?


I can't see how you can ask such a question considering you just sat back and "enjoyed" watching the worst season in White Sox history.
Author:  Nardi [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 8:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?

Aargh, matey. Ever go to the store for one thing and there's one checkout and it's 9 deep?
Author:  Douchebag [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 9:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?

With an antenna, dumbass
Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 10:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?


I can't see how you can ask such a question considering you just sat back and "enjoyed" watching the worst season in White Sox history.

I meant literally.
Author:  The Doctor Of Style [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Nardi wrote:
They seemed a little less disorganized tonight. I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch. I figured he'd be sucking air for half of his minutes but not so. Dude is busting his ass and doesn't seem fazed. Is this how they play over in Khazakistan or wherever?

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.

How do you watch these games?


I can't see how you can ask such a question considering you just sat back and "enjoyed" watching the worst season in White Sox history.

I meant literally.


Oh my bad. I forgot that they have that infinity thing going. I have a firestick streaming hookup which allows me to check it out. They actually haven't looked all that bad. Too small and too many IQ guys (Coby Zach) among their better players. Shitty Defense still but I think you'd like their style of play.

They are playing extremely fast and Giddey can play. Terrible defender but he has some tools offensively plus he hits the glass. A definite plus for a guard.

Paw has looking for his shot more but with little results. If he doesn't show shit more than he's doing now I have got to cut bait with him
Author:  RFDC [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Paw has looking for his shot more but with little results. If he doesn't show shit more than he's doing now I have got to cut bait with him


I have wanted to believe in him so bad. But he just don't got it.
Author:  St. Louis Bull Man [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 12:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
Nardi wrote:
I think Giddey is better than what he's shown. Give him a dozen games.

Weird to say this, but this type of offense kinda agrees with Vooch.

Lavine won't ever change. Turnovers are bad, but a Lavine turnover is something special.


Vooch had a 21 point, 14 boards, 7 assist game. His work in the low post has been great

Giddy had a 20 point, 7 assist, and forty+ touches game with only one turnover


Lavine and Kobe both still plow into dbl and triple teams and make mad passes in heavy traffic. Never thought I would say this, but I would trade Zach for Ben fucking Simmons right now!
Author:  The Doctor Of Style [ Sat Nov 02, 2024 4:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls@ Nets
RFDC wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Paw has looking for his shot more but with little results. If he doesn't show shit more than he's doing now I have got to cut bait with him


I have wanted to believe in him so bad. But he just don't got it.


He's doing much more off the bounce so far this year but it's about 3-4 years overdue imo. Billy D should have given him the freedom earlier because he had it in his skillset, but now that he is encouraging him to do it, it's on the Paw to make it happen. And right now the moves are there but he is not converting. Thus it's on him.
I'm going to give him about 40 games but if he is still single digits 10 on a "good night" I'm out.

The Kawhi stuff was obviously rather "ambitious" at this point, but he can still be a very good player even if he isn't in that conversation.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/