It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 12:09 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:07 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
In regards to Jay Mariott's column today about rebuilding the Bulls, it's an interesting column if it wasn't so full of contradictions.

Here it is, if you haven't read it:
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/mariotti/756954,mariotti012408.article

Mariotti says that the Bulls could attempt to clear cap space in order to sign Kobe or Wade as free agents in upcoming off-seasons, but at the same time wants to make bold moves to turn around the team for next season. You can't have it both ways unless you get extremely lucky, and I'm pretty certain that Mariotti doesn't understand salary cap rules. By clearing cap space, I'm assuming that he's talking about trading Ben Wallace and his massive contract away (2 more seasons at around $30 million). That sounds great, but you have to find someone who wants him and his massive contract. Then you have to match salaries (I believe it is within 15%) so basically we'd be taking back somebody else's garbage because, after all, who's going to trade a high priced player on a good team ? So, being realistic, maybe we can trade Ben Wallace and a spare part for Larry Hughes and a spare part. We wouldn't be getting any better for next season, and we'd also had failed to clear space.

At the same time, he also stated (and keeps repeating in other columns, which doesn't make it any more true) that the Bulls low balled Luol Deng and Ben Gordon in pre-season contract offers, yet apparently believes that these two players, who we all agree are paramount to our success at a team, deserve more money at the same time all while arguing that the the team stinks.

In addition, if the Bulls are low balling two of their own, why would a guy like Wade or Kobe want to sign here if we are doing that ?

Finally, the impression I get from Mariotti's column is that the Bulls should overpay to sign their key players (Deng/Gordon) on a team that is underachieving (and quite possibly just stinks), create cap room time at the same time, somehow get better for next season, and think about having money/cap space set aside to sign a super star in a few years......

Typical Jay Mariotti, and that's my rant for today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 5:41 pm
Posts: 1145
Location: Elgin Mental Health Institute
My Dear Friends,
You could easily argue that Gordon, Deng, and Hinrich are the three most overvalued players in the league.
The Bulls fans emotional attachment to players such as these gentlemen is not much different from the chubby Cubs fans have for Matt Murton.
No one on this team is untouchable. Not a one.
Your Dear Friend,
Bullspeakink J.A.C.K.

_________________
My Mother was a witch...she was burned alive
Thankless little bitch, for the tears I cried
Take her down now, don't wanna see her face.
All blistered and burnt, can't hide my disgrace.
Am I evil? Yes. I am.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:08 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Yeah, I most definitely do not agree that Gordon and Deng are "paramount to our success as a team". Gordon is a sixth man, and may actually be a barrier to the Bulls' success, given his defensive weakness and inability to dribble. Deng is at best the third best player on an NBA title contender. Both players are replaceable.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55946
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Evil J.A.C.K. wrote:
The Bulls fans emotional attachment to players such as these gentlemen is not much different from the chubby Cubs fans have for Matt Murton.

OMG I KNOW

He's a white guy from the Red Sox system, so he must be great!

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Tall Midget wrote:
Yeah, I most definitely do not agree that Gordon and Deng are "paramount to our success as a team". Gordon is a sixth man, and may actually be a barrier to the Bulls' success, given his defensive weakness and inability to dribble. Deng is at best the third best player on an NBA title contender. Both players are replaceable.


Gordon and Deng are paramount to the Bulls success. You can throw Hinrich and Ben Wallace in there if you want, but it matters what these guys produce (or don't produce) nightly.

It seems as if you are arguing that those guys shouldn't matter as much, and I totally agree with you on that, but, on this current team, they are our best players, and responsible for where we are now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 1:08 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
BD wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Yeah, I most definitely do not agree that Gordon and Deng are "paramount to our success as a team". Gordon is a sixth man, and may actually be a barrier to the Bulls' success, given his defensive weakness and inability to dribble. Deng is at best the third best player on an NBA title contender. Both players are replaceable.


Gordon and Deng are paramount to the Bulls success. You can throw Hinrich and Ben Wallace in there if you want, but it matters what these guys produce (or don't produce) nightly.

It seems as if you are arguing that those guys shouldn't matter as much, and I totally agree with you on that, but, on this current team, they are our best players, and responsible for where we are now.


OK, I guess I didn't understand your original point. I agree with what you say.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I heard analysts arguing a few days ago about who had the bleaker future, Miami, NY, or the Bulls. They actually all agreed that the Bulls have the brightest future, and I think thats bullshit. Miami has a way brighter future, they are cruising to a top 5 pick, have a good GM in Riley, have one of the best players in the NBA, and will clear up a ton of cap room when the Daddy goes away. Its almost inarguable that they have a better future. It would just be nice to see an All Star playing hoops in chicago again.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:15 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
FavreFan wrote:
I heard analysts arguing a few days ago about who had the bleaker future, Miami, NY, or the Bulls. They actually all agreed that the Bulls have the brightest future, and I think thats bullshit. Miami has a way brighter future, they are cruising to a top 5 pick, have a good GM in Riley, have one of the best players in the NBA, and will clear up a ton of cap room when the Daddy goes away. Its almost inarguable that they have a better future. It would just be nice to see an All Star playing hoops in chicago again.


I agree. As long as Miami has a star in Wade, they are always going to be closer to a championship than the Bulls. They need to get younger, and get rid of some of these over the hill players, but, as you mentioned, after Shaq leaves, they should have some money to spend, plus a chance this upcoming draft to add a young piece to go with Wade.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group