| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Iverson to the Bulls? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=34392 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | illini81887 [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Iverson to the Bulls? |
http://ken-berger.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/11838893/15865675 |
|
| Author: | mel junior [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
Iverson should never be allowed to talk to Derrick Rose. Ever. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
No No No |
|
| Author: | Bearison [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
Unless it is somehow Iverson from 10 years ago then I say no. |
|
| Author: | NSJ [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 12:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
"The Bulls, too, may not be eager to do business with Gordon, whose agent did not give the team a chance to match Detroit's offer." WTF? That's not true. |
|
| Author: | BD [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
NSJ wrote: "The Bulls, too, may not be eager to do business with Gordon, whose agent did not give the team a chance to match Detroit's offer." WTF? That's not true. Sounds like the Bulls spinning for their fans here. They said it was a goal to resign Ben Gordon, and now they say that the agent never gave them any of the details of his deal with the Pistons so they didn't know the details of the contract. In either case, the Bulls were not going to match the offer, and they had to know that Gordon was going to get around $10 million a year, give or take a million. The Bulls are not going to pay the luxury tax. All this talk about the Bulls wanting to sign Gordon, and then being upset about not knowing the details of his contract with the Pistons is complete garbage. I have no issue with the Bulls not resigning Gordon, but spare me the garbage. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
This is the dumbest rumor since the Bears trading Tommie Harris to get Brandon Marshall. The Bulls, just like pretty much every other team in the league, want nothing to do with the current Allen Iverson. I really liked him as a player many years ago but he's finished now and his game doesn't translate to average player. If your team has Allen Iverson shooting 20 times a game you are a lottery team. |
|
| Author: | JasonB [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
im too hungover to even think about this. i might puke |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
we talkin about...practice? not a game. not a game. we talkin' about practice. practice? |
|
| Author: | Bucky Chris [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 11:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
This is so dumb, no one even needs to explain why it's dumb. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 12:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. |
|
| Author: | Spinnin' Bucket [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
They wouldn't go into the luxury tax for Gasol; they're not doing it for Iverson. The only person this makes sense for is Gordon, because the Bulls could give him a 6th year in a sign & trade. Even if they did, they would take back a cap exception (and possibly a pick) from Detroit, but not a player. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
spanky wrote: I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. Because Iverson cannot play unless the ball is in his hands. He's not a Ray Allen set shot shooter. Derrick Rose is the PG and needs the ball in his hands. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
Chris in St. Charles wrote: This is so dumb, no one even needs to explain why it's dumb. spanky wrote: I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. I was just trying to be funny - unsuccessfully, as usual. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
spanky wrote: Chris in St. Charles wrote: This is so dumb, no one even needs to explain why it's dumb. spanky wrote: I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. I was just trying to be funny - unsuccessfully, as usual. My bad...I had a little SHARK in me by not detecting the sarcasm. 
|
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
You can't have a little SHARK in you - if he's doing something, he's going all the way. You must have a lot. There is no moderation in the SHARK. 
|
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 1:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
spmack wrote: spanky wrote: Chris in St. Charles wrote: This is so dumb, no one even needs to explain why it's dumb. spanky wrote: I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. I was just trying to be funny - unsuccessfully, as usual. My bad...I had a little SHARK in me by not detecting the sarcasm. Is there any other kind? You sound like a gay... |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
spmack wrote: My bad...I had a little SHARK in me by not detecting the sarcasm. Whoa, what are you trying to say? |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
spmack wrote: spanky wrote: Chris in St. Charles wrote: This is so dumb, no one even needs to explain why it's dumb. spanky wrote: I just wish somebody could explain to me why this is so dumb. I was just trying to be funny - unsuccessfully, as usual. My bad...I had a little SHARK in me by not detecting the sarcasm. Has anybody told Nancy and Andrew yet??
|
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
 I don't know what's funnier...the Allen Iverson/Bulls rumor or whatever Phil McCracken just typed...
|
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Iverson to the Bulls? |
SHARK wrote: :lol: I don't know what's funnier...the Allen Iverson/Bulls rumor or whatever Phil McCracken just typed... Making SHARK laugh warms my soul |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|