It is currently Wed Nov 27, 2024 4:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 267
In Bill Simmons podcast with JA Adande on espn.com, towards the end of the discussion, they started talking about where they thought LeBron would sign this summer, and Bill Simmons said that if he had to put his life on the line, that he would say Chicago.

I know it's just one guy's opinion, but I think Bill Simmons is a pretty smart basketball guy and he's right about a good amount of things. It was also stated that Lebron's main motivation in deciding on a team will be championships. Not to mention, he will be able to make up whatever additional money he would make by re-signing with the Cavs, by endorsements and "big market" kickers.

Looking at the free agent choices, there isn't a better team with cap space than the Bulls. If any free agent is looking for championships, I think the Bulls would be the perfect destination. Any thoughts?

http://sports.espn.go.com/espnradio/player?id=4870374

(Lebron discussion starts at about 57 minutes

_________________
2009 CSFMB Fantasy Basketball Champion-
2009 CSFMB Pro Football Pick'em Champion-
2011 NAS Replacement League Football-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
I'm in favor.


But it will never happen.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
The rumblings are getting stronger

The ability to clear max cap space and sign 2 superstars, with a NAME coach to add to Rose and Noah makes all the sense in the world.

And my Bulls peeps are awfully silent on this one as well!

I think Jerry Reinsdorf is a great negotiator, even when he has nothing to offer, like playing for the Sox. It's not a shot at the Sox, but I know he has tried to get in front of some free agents in the past and tried to convince them to come to the Sox side and I would hope, even the hard die Sox fan would admit the uphill battle.

For The Chairman to come to the tbale with the MJ legacy, D rose, Noah and one other Bosch like guy that could be sweeter than anyone is offering, except of course the $20 m per for 10 years Cleve will need to put on the table.

We all know Jerry is statue happy! Look for a mini statue yet to be placed in the recruiting effort.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
If I'm the Nike marketing folks...I'm buying.

Tradition(?), big market, buzz. Let's go :drunken:

...it'll never happen, right???.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Being a playoff team would be attractive but I would still be shocked if he made that move.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:23 pm
Posts: 7415
Location: Liquor in the front, Poker in the rear
pizza_Place: Lou's, Pequod's
It's gotta be hella more interesting than a New Jersey/Manhattan Nets squad even with a (presumedly drafted #1) John Wall

_________________
1926-1931-1934-1942-1944-1946-1964-1967-1982-2006-2011


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
Obviously, I would LOVE to have Lebron, but I refuse to get my hopes up and will continue to believe this is completely impossible.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
Just listened to it, not only does he say Lebron but also Bosh in Chicago.

How in the world could they afford both those guys?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 3922
Location: Right here
pizza_Place: nowhere
If things go according to the Bulls plans this team could contend for championships for a looooong time. With Rose, Noah and the potential signings of 2 big name free agents will put the Bulls over the top. I'm sure some of the 2010 guys are taking this into strong consideration. Bosh along with Wade or James = Championship. All great team players. Also depending on who comes and goes the bench could be pretty good as well

_________________
"You can kill the revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
I had a feeling he might be inclined to come to the bulls back when he wanted to have the entire nba retire the #23 so it wouldn't be an issue when had to change his number.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
Lebron probably won't move. Cleveland should have some cap space next year with Big Z and Shaq coming off the books. I don't know how far over the tax they are right now, but I would think that dropping $30M+ would have to allow them to sign a max guy like Bosh.
BUT, they could use one of those expirings to get a guy like Jamison or Troy Murphy, which would be good for them short term, but would absolutely destroy them long term.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Can someone post a salary cap breakdown? I hear many people on this board talk about adding two max contracts. I'm pretty damn sure that we will not have the money for that. In my best SHARK voice, Sorry Bulls fans, but the Bulls will not sign two big name FA's this summer!

bigfan - fyi, Cleveland cant offer LeBron a 10 year deal. After Magic signed that 25 year deal with the Lakers the NBA restructured the contracts

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
i told all yall bosh and lebron are coming months ago. get with the times! rose, bosh, lebron and noah leaves us one major open spot, but really even if we just played 4 on 5 the whole season we would probably still win the east

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 9:18 pm
Posts: 1055
Thats what I thought too FF - I'm assuming someone like Simmons would know that so I just thought I was wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
ChgoSportsFreak wrote:
Thats what I thought too FF - I'm assuming someone like Simmons would know that so I just thought I was wrong.


I dont think so. I cant see how the numbers work. The salary cap is expected to lower to somewhere between $50-52 million this offseason. LeBron and Bosh will each be able to sign $20M/year contracts. And Deng and Hinrich are already making a combined $18 million.

Basically, we dont have the money. People need to stop suggesting we will sign two max FA's. Let's be really happy if we get 1.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
so youre saying theres a chance? YES!!!!!!!!!!!! HELLO LEBRON AND BOSH!!!!!!

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
FavreFan wrote:
ChgoSportsFreak wrote:
Thats what I thought too FF - I'm assuming someone like Simmons would know that so I just thought I was wrong.


I dont think so. I cant see how the numbers work. The salary cap is expected to lower to somewhere between $50-52 million this offseason. LeBron and Bosh will each be able to sign $20M/year contracts. And Deng and Hinrich are already making a combined $18 million.

Basically, we dont have the money. People need to stop suggesting we will sign two max FA's. Let's be really happy if we get 1.


I don't think the first year salary for a max deal is $20M. I think it's closer to $15M. That said, the bulls, as currently constructed, are probably right on the threshhold of being able to offer ONE max deal and nothing else. If they can somehow shed Hinrich and Salmons (or Salmons is dumb enough to opt out after this year), they would be close to 2.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Bulldog Scott wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
ChgoSportsFreak wrote:
Thats what I thought too FF - I'm assuming someone like Simmons would know that so I just thought I was wrong.


I dont think so. I cant see how the numbers work. The salary cap is expected to lower to somewhere between $50-52 million this offseason. LeBron and Bosh will each be able to sign $20M/year contracts. And Deng and Hinrich are already making a combined $18 million.

Basically, we dont have the money. People need to stop suggesting we will sign two max FA's. Let's be really happy if we get 1.


I don't think the first year salary for a max deal is $20M. I think it's closer to $15M. That said, the bulls, as currently constructed, are probably right on the threshhold of being able to offer ONE max deal and nothing else. If they can somehow shed Hinrich and Salmons (or Salmons is dumb enough to opt out after this year), they would be close to 2.


Right, but you also need to consider that Rose and Noah will be up for extensions after the season, having only 1 year left each.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
With the ridiculous amount of endorsement money out there, who said these two are going to demand max contracts?? They can make max money where they are now, but they want to win championships.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 3422
Location: Candyland
I think they can wait to resign their own guys (that have time left on their current deals) until after they sign free agents. So, in theory, they could sign a bit time player (or two!) and be under the cap, then extend their own guys.

_________________
"Tubby? Oh yes, Tubby."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23857
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
With the ridiculous amount of endorsement money out there, who said these two are going to demand max contracts?? They can make max money where they are now, but they want to win championships.

Most guys that accept less to play for championship teams aren't max guys. I'd guess ego gets in the way with that, who knows, would still be nice.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
The Bulls are on the hook for about $37.7M next season if they don't make a deal. If they happen to trade for one of those elite guys (Bosh) this year the salary cap won't mean as much in the offseason because of the Bird rule. They would be able to get another guy like LeBron without going over the cap. Uncle Jerry has said many times he has no problem paying the luxury tax for the right guy. He was willing to do it for Kobe so I believe he would do it for LeBron.

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/chicago.htm

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
HOVA wrote:
The Bulls are on the hook for about $37.7M next season if they don't make a deal. If they happen to trade for one of those elite guys (Bosh) this year the salary cap won't mean as much in the offseason because of the Bird rule. They would be able to get another guy like LeBron without going over the cap. Uncle Jerry has said many times he has no problem paying the luxury tax for the right guy. He was willing to do it for Kobe so I believe he would do it for LeBron.

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/chicago.htm


If they are on the hook for $37.7 next year and deal for Bosh, assuming the salaries are roughly equal, wouldnt that leave only 12.3-14.3 million left? That's not enough to get a max guy.

And then consider Noah will be looking for Deng money if he keeps improving, and Rose will obviously want CP3 money if he keeps leaping, you'd be talking about massive luxury tax money. Think Knicks 4-5 years ago type salary. I'm not sure Jerry would do that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
The Bulls are on the hook for about $37.7M next season if they don't make a deal. If they happen to trade for one of those elite guys (Bosh) this year the salary cap won't mean as much in the offseason because of the Bird rule. They would be able to get another guy like LeBron without going over the cap. Uncle Jerry has said many times he has no problem paying the luxury tax for the right guy. He was willing to do it for Kobe so I believe he would do it for LeBron.

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/chicago.htm


If they are on the hook for $37.7 next year and deal for Bosh, assuming the salaries are roughly equal, wouldnt that leave only 12.3-14.3 million left? That's not enough to get a max guy.

And then consider Noah will be looking for Deng money if he keeps improving, and Rose will obviously want CP3 money if he keeps leaping, you'd be talking about massive luxury tax money. Think Knicks 4-5 years ago type salary. I'm not sure Jerry would do that.

wouldnt some of that money be leaving in the deal for bosh such as deng or kirk?

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
The Bulls are on the hook for about $37.7M next season if they don't make a deal. If they happen to trade for one of those elite guys (Bosh) this year the salary cap won't mean as much in the offseason because of the Bird rule. They would be able to get another guy like LeBron without going over the cap. Uncle Jerry has said many times he has no problem paying the luxury tax for the right guy. He was willing to do it for Kobe so I believe he would do it for LeBron.

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/chicago.htm


If they are on the hook for $37.7 next year and deal for Bosh, assuming the salaries are roughly equal, wouldnt that leave only 12.3-14.3 million left? That's not enough to get a max guy.

And then consider Noah will be looking for Deng money if he keeps improving, and Rose will obviously want CP3 money if he keeps leaping, you'd be talking about massive luxury tax money. Think Knicks 4-5 years ago type salary. I'm not sure Jerry would do that.

wouldnt some of that money be leaving in the deal for bosh such as deng or kirk?


I dont think they would trade Deng, and why would the Raptors want him when they just gave Hedo a bunch of money?

Yes, some of that money would be leaving, but Bosh is making $15 million. So it'd be coming back. We want to get rid of Salmons and Kirk. Even if we did, we'd be getting it back because combined they make about what Bosh does.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
FavreFan wrote:
HOVA wrote:
The Bulls are on the hook for about $37.7M next season if they don't make a deal. If they happen to trade for one of those elite guys (Bosh) this year the salary cap won't mean as much in the offseason because of the Bird rule. They would be able to get another guy like LeBron without going over the cap. Uncle Jerry has said many times he has no problem paying the luxury tax for the right guy. He was willing to do it for Kobe so I believe he would do it for LeBron.

http://hoopshype.com/salaries/chicago.htm


If they are on the hook for $37.7 next year and deal for Bosh, assuming the salaries are roughly equal, wouldnt that leave only 12.3-14.3 million left? That's not enough to get a max guy.

And then consider Noah will be looking for Deng money if he keeps improving, and Rose will obviously want CP3 money if he keeps leaping, you'd be talking about massive luxury tax money. Think Knicks 4-5 years ago type salary. I'm not sure Jerry would do that.


What the Bulls pay Bosh wouldn't matter at that point. A guy like LeBron may only want a 3 year deal again. That would put him roughly in the same area he is now as far as salary. The Bulls won't have a problem getting 1 guy. Their problem will be getting 2 without a trade this season.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
What do you mean it wont matter what they pay Bosh? He's already earning $15 million. Obviously any potential trade would have to include a mutual agreement on an extension. So the Bulls will still have roughly the same salary they have now, thus not leaving room for a max contract.

LeBron wont want a 3 year deal. He's gonna want a similar one to the ones him, Kobe, Wade, Melo have been signing. 6 years, with an option to opt out at 3 years(so he can get a new deal done every 3 years while still guaranteeing him 6 years worth of money in case of injury or something.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27518
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
FavreFan wrote:
What do you mean it wont matter what they pay Bosh? He's already earning $15 million. Obviously any potential trade would have to include a mutual agreement on an extension. So the Bulls will still have roughly the same salary they have now, thus not leaving room for a max contract.

LeBron wont want a 3 year deal. He's gonna want a similar one to the ones him, Kobe, Wade, Melo have been signing. 6 years, with an option to opt out at 3 years(so he can get a new deal done every 3 years while still guaranteeing him 6 years worth of money in case of injury or something.

If bosh is acquired in a trade then he would technically be a re-sign? I thought there were some different allowances for re-signs and extensions as opposed to signing a true free agent.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
FavreFan wrote:
What do you mean it wont matter what they pay Bosh? He's already earning $15 million. Obviously any potential trade would have to include a mutual agreement on an extension. So the Bulls will still have roughly the same salary they have now, thus not leaving room for a max contract.

LeBron wont want a 3 year deal. He's gonna want a similar one to the ones him, Kobe, Wade, Melo have been signing. 6 years, with an option to opt out at 3 years(so he can get a new deal done every 3 years while still guaranteeing him 6 years worth of money in case of injury or something.


The Bulls would be able to exceed the salary cap to re-sign Bosh (Bird rule). That's why his contract wouldn't really matter if they trade for him. Bulls will only be able to give LeBron a 5 year deal starting around $16.6M next season.

Maximum salaries are based on years of service, with players broken into tiers. In 2010, the top free agents — James, Wade and Bosh — will be entering the tier for seven- to nine-year veterans. This year, the league wide maximum salary for a seven- to nine-year veteran is about $16.2 million, and like the salary cap, this amount changes yearly, based on league revenues. Given the league’s salary-cap projections, the league wide maximum salary for a seven- to nine-year veteran in 2010 will probably fall in the $14.2 million to $15.1 million range. Players also have a personal maximum of 105 percent of their previous salary, and can sign for the greater of their personal maximum and the league wide maximum. For James, Wade and Bosh, this is about $16.6 million, which is the figure each will be able to command in the free-agent market.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57244
So basically if we are going to get 2 guys from this class, we had better get one of them before the trading deadline, which would get rid of a couple more of our contracts, plus give us better options to resigning the guy we get from a trade???

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group