Hatchetman wrote:
man, that list falls apart after the top 9-10.
That's what I was thinking. A whole lot of suck right there...
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=42856 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/basketball/bulls/-1,bulls-top25-gallery-12.photogallery?index=1 Thank God for Jordan! |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
man, that list falls apart after the top 9-10. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
Hatchetman wrote: man, that list falls apart after the top 9-10. That's what I was thinking. A whole lot of suck right there... |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
OKC is not going to like this. He will say it should be the top 25 Bulls not named Scottie. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
No Scott(ie) Williams? |
|
| Author: | JasonB [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
theres something wrong when luc longley is in your teams top 25 |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
JasonB wrote: theres something wrong when luc longley is in your teams top 25 This is true... |
|
| Author: | Glendale Heights Brian [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
JasonB wrote: theres something wrong when luc longley is in your teams top 25 AGREE!! |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 12:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
There is no way in hell that Toni Kukoc was a better player than John Paxson.....no f'n way. And on top of that B.J. Armstrong? Really? Top 25? Might as well have put Jud Buechler on there. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
Phil McCracken wrote: There is no way in hell that Toni Kukoc was a better player than John Paxson.....no f'n way. And on top of that B.J. Armstrong? Really? Top 25? Might as well have put Jud Buechler on there. Kukoc was better than both Pax and BJ. Not sure what you have been smokin. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
RFDC wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: There is no way in hell that Toni Kukoc was a better player than John Paxson.....no f'n way. And on top of that B.J. Armstrong? Really? Top 25? Might as well have put Jud Buechler on there. Kukoc was better than both Pax and BJ. Not sure what you have been smokin. Agree on B.J. Armstrong I mangled it in my post but I was trying to say that I could not believe he was on the list to begin with and Kukoc was not better than Pax. Paxson would man up and play some D and actually take the rock to the hole. Kukoc was soft and played away from contact. Bascially he was Deng with 3 point range and a better eye for passing. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
Phil McCracken wrote: Kukoc was not better than Pax. Paxson would man up and play some D and actually take the rock to the hole. Kukoc was soft and played away from contact. Bascially he was Deng with 3 point range and a better eye for passing. Kukoc averaged more points, assists, steals, and rebounds over the course of his career. Yeah Pax was a better player on D, but it isn't like Pax was some shut down guy on D either. Kukoc was better in his career than Pax. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
RFDC wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: Kukoc was not better than Pax. Paxson would man up and play some D and actually take the rock to the hole. Kukoc was soft and played away from contact. Bascially he was Deng with 3 point range and a better eye for passing. Kukoc averaged more points, assists, steals, and rebounds over the course of his career. Yeah Pax was a better player on D, but it isn't like Pax was some shut down guy on D either. Kukoc was better in his career than Pax. Kukoc wasn't Chicago tough. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 1:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
Phil McCracken wrote: RFDC wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: Kukoc was not better than Pax. Paxson would man up and play some D and actually take the rock to the hole. Kukoc was soft and played away from contact. Bascially he was Deng with 3 point range and a better eye for passing. Kukoc averaged more points, assists, steals, and rebounds over the course of his career. Yeah Pax was a better player on D, but it isn't like Pax was some shut down guy on D either. Kukoc was better in his career than Pax. Kukoc wasn't Chicago tough. Pax was probably more of a WWF guy back in the day too.
|
|
| Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
A few minor quibbles. I'd swap Artis Gilmore & Norm & I'd rate Theus above Horace. I'd move Oakley up to the 11 slot followed by Boerwinkle. Longley out - replaced by Deng. 
|
|
| Author: | spmack [ Fri Feb 12, 2010 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Potash's 25 greatest Bulls -MJ |
Hopefully we'll get our boards own M.Jeff to respond to this, quite naturally... |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|