| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Nate Robinson https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=74163 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Mini Ditka [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Nate Robinson |
He seems like a streaky shooter. Do you think he will get any playing time under Thibs? |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Yes. |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
He will fill the Bulls' void for a midget chucker. |
|
| Author: | Mini Ditka [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Big Chicagoan wrote: He will fill the Bulls' void for a midget chucker. Except JL3 never won a slam dunk contest. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
As long as he plays D, I don't see why not. He's going to be first guard off the bench, and will probably get some starts when RIP Hamilton is going through one of his ouchie periods. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
If reports about Teague are true then Thibs won't have much of a choice. But Nate is bad. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
FavreFan wrote: If reports about Teague are true then Thibs won't have much of a choice. But Nate is bad. What reports? I haven't been paying any attention this past week to preseason hoops. Is he injured? |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Douchebag wrote: FavreFan wrote: If reports about Teague are true then Thibs won't have much of a choice. But Nate is bad. What reports? I haven't been paying any attention this past week to preseason hoops. Is he injured? According to Bernstein, Teague is not doing really good. Gonna be a D-leaguer. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
spmack wrote: Douchebag wrote: FavreFan wrote: If reports about Teague are true then Thibs won't have much of a choice. But Nate is bad. What reports? I haven't been paying any attention this past week to preseason hoops. Is he injured? According to Bernstein, Teague is not doing really good. Gonna be a D-leaguer. Bernstein was like the 4th person in the media I have heard say that. Pretty much every report I've heard about Teague says he is at best a project player. |
|
| Author: | Mini Ditka [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
FavreFan wrote: Pretty much every report I've heard about Teague says he is at best a project player. I thought they tore down the projects? |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Thu Oct 18, 2012 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Mini Ditka wrote: FavreFan wrote: Pretty much every report I've heard about Teague says he is at best a project player. I thought they tore down the projects? Stick to creating bad threads minid. |
|
| Author: | Hawkeye Vince [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
The general reports are that Teague is struggling mightily on the defensive end, understanding how to play defense at the NBA level. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
|
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Between Robinson & Heinrich,the Bulls PG's should combine for at least 18 pts and 12 assists every night. So who needs DRose? JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always chokes/breaksdown when it counts. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: Between Robinson & Heinrich,the Bulls PG's should combine for at least 18 pts and 12 assists every night. So who needs DRose? JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always chokes/breaksdown when it counts. 
|
|
| Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Jimmy, just stop it. Phil, this is random but I sometimes wake up in cold sweats trying to understand why you hated the Kaner mult so much. I won't rest until this chapter is closed in my life. You hold the answers. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Jimmy, just stop it. Phil, this is random but I sometimes wake up in cold sweats trying to understand why you hated the Kaner mult so much. I won't rest until this chapter is closed in my life. You hold the answers. So it's not possible each of those guys can average 9 pts and 6 assists PG? |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Jimmy, just stop it. Phil, this is random but I sometimes wake up in cold sweats trying to understand why you hated the Kaner mult so much. I won't rest until this chapter is closed in my life. You hold the answers. 
|
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always breaksdown when it counts. I knew DRose's ACL was a pussy. |
|
| Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Jimmy, your "Derrick Rose always chokes/breaks down when it counts" comment was ridiculous. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
He's the star of my favorite basketball gif of all time... scoreboard 
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: jimmypasta wrote: JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always breaksdown when it counts. I knew DRose's ACL was a pussy. And the year before? It's always something. Excuses are for losers. Right now DRose is a superstar in the REGULAR season...PERIOD...EXCLAMATION POINT |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: Between Robinson & Heinrich,the Bulls PG's should combine for at least 18 pts and 12 assists every night. So who needs DRose? JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always chokes/breaksdown when it counts. james you do realize that Nasty Nate is a defensive liability and notorious chucker at the position where you actually need to set up other players and Heinrich is on the back 9 of a decent career where he has been played out of position as a PG when in reality he is an undersized 2 who can't shoot right? |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: jimmypasta wrote: JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always breaksdown when it counts. I knew DRose's ACL was a pussy. And the year before? It's always something. Excuses are for losers. Right now DRose is a superstar in the REGULAR season...PERIOD...EXCLAMATION POINT The year before he averaged 27 points and 8 assists a game - up from 25/7 for the season. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
In NBA basketball at least,defense usually means "Did you score one more point than the guy you guarded?" I know Heinrich is a "tweeney",but I think he will do just fine at the point...at least I hope. |
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
James.......you should just stop. Everyone will forget if you just stop now... |
|
| Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: jimmypasta wrote: JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always breaksdown when it counts. I knew DRose's ACL was a pussy. And the year before? It's always something. Excuses are for losers. Right now DRose is a superstar in the REGULAR season...PERIOD...EXCLAMATION POINT That's just patently dumb. The year before, the team rode his back to the best record in the NBA and a deep playoff run. He was the ONLY scoring option that year. Blame the people who thought it was a good idea not to put any other scorers around him. Jordan didn't win any titles with Ennis Whatley and Artis Gilmore surrounding him either. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
jimmypasta wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: jimmypasta wrote: JK,but I wonder if that duo would hold up better in the playoffs than a DRose who always breaksdown when it counts. I knew DRose's ACL was a pussy. And the year before? It's always something. Excuses are for losers. Right now DRose is a superstar in the REGULAR season...PERIOD...EXCLAMATION POINT james don't take this the wrong way but I am concerned you don't know anything about basketball. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
Artis Gilmore? Man don't diss him He led the NBA in shooting % in his last two Bulls seasons. The Bulls best Center. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Nate Robinson |
The Gilmore that played with Jordan wasn't Gilmore. He was 1,000,000 years old by then. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|