Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Celtics @ Bulls
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=74788		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Celtics @ Bulls
Titles are the hardest.

Nate Robinson sucks.
Author:  Don Tiny [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
Nate going to shoot everytime he touches the ball tonight.

Hinrich will get as many minutes as Rose.

Rondo going to do silly things to dem Bulls.

Kevin Garnett remains king of the bitches.

Which happens more often: Boozer yelling "Jo" or Thibs yelling "Ice"?

Deng and Pierce will be your important players for each team.

If the game goes to shit, there's always the Chiefs playing in the Arkush bowl, the CT-losing WWE, or your DVR ... I happen to have many hours of the 3 Stooges saved just in case of evenings like this.

Watch, or don't .... the season is a waste, after all ... just ask Bernstein.
Author:  crosscheck [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
I'm trying to fill a void... this isn't working.
Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
crosscheck wrote:
I'm trying to fill a void... this isn't working.

This Bulls thing is just not entertaining right now.
Author:  Douchebag [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
Rondo might drop 40 on Nate tonight.
Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
This game is just godawfully boring. I'm outta here. Watching Rockets/Heat.
Author:  Mini Ditka [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
Teague actually got some playing time. I get the sense that Hinrich is injury prone. The Bulls made it interesting out there in the 4th, but they failed to hit enough free throws down the stretch to stay in the game. They also missed a lot of shots when they were holding the Celtics scoreless. I get the sense that Hinrich, Hamilton and Boozer are not going to see much 4th Quarter action. Without Rose I think this is a .500 team.
Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
Mini Ditka wrote:
Teague actually got some playing time. I get the sense that Hinrich is injury prone. The Bulls made it interesting out there in the 4th, but they failed to hit enough free throws down the stretch to stay in the game. They also missed a lot of shots when they were holding the Celtics scoreless. I get the sense that Hinrich, Hamilton and Boozer are not going to see much 4th Quarter action. Without Rose I think this is a .500 team.

What happened to your guy Nate? He was riding the bench the entire 4th quarter.

Teague actually looked pretty good out there for his first extended minutes of his carrer. When Kirk is back, im all for Nate falling down the depth chart, or even falling off a bridge. Let the kid play and see what he can do.
Author:  Mini Ditka [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
Douchebag wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Teague actually got some playing time. I get the sense that Hinrich is injury prone. The Bulls made it interesting out there in the 4th, but they failed to hit enough free throws down the stretch to stay in the game. They also missed a lot of shots when they were holding the Celtics scoreless. I get the sense that Hinrich, Hamilton and Boozer are not going to see much 4th Quarter action. Without Rose I think this is a .500 team.

What happened to your guy Nate? He was riding the bench the entire 4th quarter.

Teague actually looked pretty good out there for his first extended minutes of his carrer. When Kirk is back, im all for Nate falling down the depth chart, or even falling off a bridge. Let the kid play and see what he can do.


The biggest thing with the point guard is just moving the ball. You don't want to be a ball stopper. Teague is not going to shoot every time like Nate because if he does Thibs won't play him. Nate is a streaky player. He can shoot you in and out of games. The problem is just that the Bulls don't have enough firepower on the team to score at will regardless of who is playing point guard. The one advantage with Nate is that when he's on he could give you 15 points.
Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:20 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
This team is screwed.

I will agree with Mini on one thing: This is a .500 team without Derrick. People gave me crap because I thought it was absurd for the Bulls to be picked to win around 48 games. I stand by that. They'll win 40 to 42 games max. They may still be decent defensively, but they are among the worst offensive teams in the league. So they'll give up 85 to 90 points a game while struggling themselves to score 80.
Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
This team is screwed.

I will agree with Mini on one thing: This is a .500 team without Derrick. People gave me crap because I thought it was absurd for the Bulls to be picked to win around 48 games. I still think 48 is a high number. They'll win 40 to 42 games max.

The division is bad, and is their's for the taking.

I think they win the division with around 45 wins, which gives them a top 4 seed in the playoffs. Looking at the schedule they had so far, the only surprise loss was against New Orleans at home. I think Thibs will get the ship righted, and the team will start to play better after the circus trip. Right now it's just guys trying to figure out their role, and it's really killing them down the stretch in games.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Tue Nov 13, 2012 9:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Celtics @ Bulls
IGNORE EVERYTHING BECAUSE THEY HAVE ONLY HAD ONE BAD LOSS! </BRick>
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/