Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Bulls' Playoff Seed https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=76693 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Mini Ditka [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Bulls' Playoff Seed |
What seed would you like to see the Bulls get? |
Author: | beni hanna [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? |
Author: | Mini Ditka [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? I think it all depends on matchups and sometimes having the higher seed isn't better. |
Author: | beni hanna [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Mini Ditka wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? I think it all depends on matchups and sometimes having the higher seed isn't better. So, half way through the season how is one going to know the matchups? How about a thread change and ask who the Bulls best/worst playoff opponents might be? |
Author: | 312player [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Thinking bulls are a three seed. |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
HHAhahahaha awe thanks guys. i just read a bunch of replies that i wanted to say. this thread is awesome |
Author: | conns7901 [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Anything other than 4,5,8. |
Author: | beni hanna [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? Since 1999 4 # 1's have won the Champioship and none since 2008.So you Enlightened boy?????? What an uninformed jo |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? Since 1999 4 # 1's have won the Champioship and none since 2008.So you Enlightened boy?????? What an uninformed jo It simply amazes me when People call me out there is a herd of haters When i speak the truth there is not a word Not a lot of men on here...a lot of bullies |
Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? Since 1999 4 # 1's have won the Champioship and none since 2008.So you Enlightened boy?????? What an uninformed jo How many 5's, 6's, 7's, or 8's have won championships? |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
How many 5's, 6's, 7's, or 8's have won championships?[/quote] That was Not the question was it???? |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? no response = loser |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? MUHAHAHA we have a basketball virgin on the boards! WEEEEEE!!! |
Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
What does it matter when you won't beat Miami? |
Author: | beni hanna [ Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: beni hanna wrote: :scratch: If one happens to be a Bulls fan, why would one want anything other than the #1 seed for Your Bulls? Then you just confirmed Bulls fans are idiots How so? Enlighten me Walt. When is it not best to be the #1 seed? Are there a whole bunch of scary #8 seeds out there? no response = loser Interesting. I guess having to sit down and eat with the little lady makes me a loser. It was and is an honest question no team shoots for 2-8. Doesn't matter who wins. I won't be checking back in tonight. If that makes me a noon or loser, so be it. I will still sleep well tonight. Walt, you need to be on Q's hof. You earned it. |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
immessedup17 wrote: Year of Playoffs - Seed of NBA Champion: 2012 - #2 2011 - #3 2010 - #1 2009 - #1 2008 - #1 2007 - #3 2006 - #2 2005 - #2 2004 - #3 2003 - #1 2002 - #3 2001 - #2 2000 - #1 1999 - #1 That is 6 #1 seeds winning since 1999. Guess which seed has the highest number of championships in that stretch of time? Number 1 seed. No lower than a #3 seed has won the championship in that time. How many teams lower than a 3 seed even made it to the championship you ask? 3. Three out of a possible 28 teams were a 4 seed or lower. Do some research before you spout off shit. Not that there would be a risk of anyone accidentally thinking you know any little bit about the NBA. interperet what you post before you gloat that list proves from #1 to #3 it basically matters on who you play, not your seed number. it is interesting that a 4 has never won, but that just shows you how significant it is that from 1 to 3 it matters none. |
Author: | Mr. Belvidere [ Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
this is a stupid thread. Or it turned out that way. Home Court advantage is assured by being the one seed. The NBA is the one sport where Home Court/Field is important. Match up or not. This is all silly. |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Maybe I can't read http://nbahoopsonline.com/History/Records/BestRecords.html |
Author: | Mini Ditka [ Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Ideally I would like to see them as the #1 seed, but there is really no catching Miami at this point. I think the Bulls would do best as a 2, 3 or 6 seed. Being that they are a better road team I think having a lower seed might put a little less pressure on them if they can get one or two of the first round series games on the road. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 8:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
The seed is strong. |
Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Terry's Peeps wrote: The seed is strong. It's Friday. |
Author: | SHARK [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Right now, they'd draw the Knicks in Round 1 in a #3 vs. #6 matchup, but tomorrow's rematch with the Nets at the U.C. might also be a first round matchup in a possible #4/#5. Even if Derrick Martell Rose doesn't play 1 minute, I think this Bulls' team is good enough to win their first series and that's it. |
Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Why do you put Derrick Rose's middle name in every reference? |
Author: | SHARK [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Why do you put Derrick Rose's middle name in every reference? OKC, that's his full name. I looked it up on Derrick's Wikipedia page. Besides, Chet Coppock always referred to Michael Jordan as Michael Jeffrey Jordan, not to mention Mike Ditka as Michael Kellard Ditka. The late, great Harry Kalas also once referred to Phillies' 3B Mike Schmidt as Michael Jack Schmidt, too. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
SHARK wrote: The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Why do you put Derrick Rose's middle name in every reference? OKC, that's his full name. I looked it up on Derrick's Wikipedia page. Besides, Chet Coppock always referred to Michael Jordan as Michael Jeffrey Jordan, not to mention Mike Ditka as Michael Kellard Ditka. The late, great Harry Kalas also once referred to Phillies' 3B Mike Schmidt as Michael Jack Schmidt, too. SHARK, can I get your middle and last name so that I know how to address you in all of my post to you? |
Author: | SHARK [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Keeping Score wrote: SHARK wrote: The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Why do you put Derrick Rose's middle name in every reference? OKC, that's his full name. I looked it up on Derrick's Wikipedia page. SHARK speaks the truth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derrick_Rose |
Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
Keeping Score wrote: SHARK wrote: The Original Kid Cairo wrote: Why do you put Derrick Rose's middle name in every reference? OKC, that's his full name. I looked it up on Derrick's Wikipedia page. I literally had no response for that. |
Author: | SHARK [ Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bulls' Playoff Seed |
They won't catch the Heat. That's a given. The Eastern Conference is a crapshoot beyond the #1 seed. I've heard Silvy suggest the Bulls finish as high as #3 so they would avoid Miami until the Conference Finals. If they finished at #4 or #5, they might get the Heat in Round 2 depending on the bracket. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |