Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Bulls @ Pacers
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=77451		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  FavreFan [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Bulls @ Pacers
Bulls will win by 6. Noah will make Hibbert cry
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Bulls win by 2.

The myth of the Pacers being a solid team takes a hit.
Author:  cluv8484 [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
This would be a good get, is skelator playing or is he still too old and achey?
Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
What's worse?

Neil & Stacey on the U?

Or Doris Burke on the ESPN call?

Who you got, SHARK?
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Doris Burke is the worse option.
Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Bagels better not crank the bass with Doris Burke's deep baritone on the call.
Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
I think Thibs is actually managing minutes this game. We're seeing a lot of Nazr and Vlad-Rad. Maybe GarPax had a chat with him after last night's game.
Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
The U needs to rotate their commercials a bit. I've seen the Bud Light Pitbull commercial about 100 times tonight, and that CitiBank rock climbing commercial too. Sometimes I've even gotten doubles in the same commercial break.
Author:  conns7901 [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Quote:
Dan Bernstein ‏@dan_bernstein
Regardless of outcome, we can laugh at last week's @Boers_Bernstein callers saying #Bulls "have tuned out" Thibs. Dumb then, dumber now.
Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 10:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Bulls win by 2.

The myth of the Pacers being a solid team takes a hit.


Regardless of outcome, the Pacers aren't a solid team?
Author:  Mini Ditka [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
I think not having Hinrich, Hamilton and Gibson hurts for this game. Nate Robinson was so ineffective that he was benched. With Hinrich and Hamilton they probably get out to a better start and Gibson could probably defend David West better than the Bulls' other bigs down the stretch.
Author:  Phil McCracken [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Mini Ditka wrote:
I think not having Hinrich, Hamilton and Gibson hurts for this game.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsaCYXSD_WM
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Bulls win by 2.

The myth of the Pacers being a solid team takes a hit.


Regardless of outcome, the Pacers aren't a solid team?


I just meant they're not head and shoulders better than the Bulls.
Author:  Douchebag [ Sun Mar 03, 2013 11:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
I think if the Bulls had Derick Rose they would be better. Do you guys agree?
Author:  Mini Ditka [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Powerhouse233 wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Bulls win by 2.

The myth of the Pacers being a solid team takes a hit.


Regardless of outcome, the Pacers aren't a solid team?


I just meant they're not head and shoulders better than the Bulls.


The Pacers have won the last two games against the Bulls because of David West. Without Gibson to shut him down the Bulls are unable to get enough stops against Indiana down the stretch.
Author:  cpguy [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Nice to see Deng finally throw down a couple dunks like he means it. He needs to step up for them to have any chance to even get past the first round.

So given where they are at cap wise next year, do you move Jimmy Butler into the starting 2 guard role?
Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
The Pacers are just flat out better than the Bulls.
Author:  Mini Ditka [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
The Pacers are just flat out better than the Bulls.


You're missing Rose, Gibson, Hinrich and Hamilton on the road where the Pacers are 25-6 and you lose by 5 points. They were down by 3 in a position to tie the game when they fumbled the inbounds pass at the end of the game. Like I said before if David West doesn't get 31 points you win that game. Boozer gives you 6 points and West gets 31. The Bulls got beat up on the boards 32-26. I don't think it's that difficult to see why the Bulls lost that game. Another thing is that the Pacers don't really have much coming in off that bench either (8 points for the game). I think it's important to remember that they had to play Teague for extended minutes because Robinson was almost complete ineffective shooting wise and running the offense.
Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
The Pacers are just flat out better than the Bulls.


That is simply untrue.

They are both on the second tier on teams under Miami.
Author:  RFDC [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
The Pacers are just flat out better than the Bulls.


That is simply untrue.

They are both on the second tier on teams under Miami.

So much for Nsync
Author:  lipidquadcab [ Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bulls @ Pacers
RFDC wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
The Pacers are just flat out better than the Bulls.


That is simply untrue.

They are both on the second tier on teams under Miami.

So much for Nsync

Image
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/